535
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 108 points 1 year ago

Barely half score above the Median

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

We can do so much better...

[-] Acamon@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago
[-] macattack@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the frustrating thing about the current internet climate. In a time when less and less people are interested in researching the backstory of a tweet/policy/person, things like this are shared w/o context. Had to go down a rabbit hole to realize it's a fake satire writer.

[-] Tilgare@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I get where you're coming from and tend to agree. And yet in this case, he says the bottom 25% are in the bottom 25%. That's literally just how numbers work. That's the entire substance of the post. That seems a clear joke, imo.

But I guess I say that, and then there's Rep MTG who says far dumber shit, except completely seriously. I guess it's hard to tell the difference between joke stupid and real stupid these days.

[-] eyeon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

it's frustrating that people react and spread misinformation without doing the bare minimum of research, but I don't think making obvious satire is frustrating. if anything hopefully people learn from it and stop taking screenshots of things as truths

[-] macattack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

True.

I think that as we move towards shorter and shorter clips/tweets, there's an assumed prior context that is often missing. For example, Borat or Stephen Colbert's character on The Daily Show are clear caricatures but when you have a 5-second clip out of context, it actually feeds into the narrative it is ridiculing.

The same goes for naming cosplaying an elected official.

[-] geissi@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago

things like this are shared w/o context

I mean, the only information in that truthorfiction link that wasn't in the original tweet is that Jack Kimble is not a real representative.
Apart from that, there is no other context. The tweet is exactly as it appears to be, it's not a reference to anything else.
Either you understand that it's a joke or not.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -2 points 1 year ago

Drag assumed it was a joke to begin with. The graph is too generic.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That page was a lot of waffle to say it's a satire tweet from a fictional congressman.

[-] nailingjello@lemmy.zip 43 points 1 year ago

Next you'll probably tell me that one out of every four people make up 25% of the population. Hogwash!

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Sometimes it don't always be like it is but it do.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

Not familiar with the poster, is this satire?

[-] Acamon@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

I commented at the same time as you, otherwise I'd have replied to you directly. It is a real tweet, but satire, Jack Kimble is not a real politician (he purports to represent California's 54th district, out of 52).

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Aaah, it's that guy, cheers.

[-] Aeao@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

As a person educated in the American system I can confirm I've never heard the word quartile before.

I want to see this graphed over time

[-] semi@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Lucky for you, the post contains an animated JPEG showing the change over time

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

people in the lower quartile coming in the comment section looking for explanation

[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

🤦🏾‍♂️

[-] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Blud need to put his data points on the chart so we know whose in each percentile

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
535 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

10914 readers
221 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS