116
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

I merged the headline and the first paragraph.

Honda and Nissan have formally agreed to hold talks over the next six months on a possible merger, a deal that would create the world’s third-largest automaker and give them more resources to compete with a growing threat from Chinese carmakers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 51 points 1 week ago

Could just make better cars too but nah gotta try to compete by cheating

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] darkmode@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago

Why compete at all? I think the top Chinese state owned car company could do a bang up job if they owned Nissan and Honda

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nissan really hasn't been the same after their CEO had to escape in the trunk of a car.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Hahah I forgot about that

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

Forget China, they can't make a better car than Toyota right now

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

I'm waiting for the day they do.

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

How familiar are you with Chinese cars

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sickos@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago

Corporate wars timeline

[-] miz@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago
[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

my first question. I bet they combine them as two full names. like Honda-Nissan instead of a new mixto name.

like DaimlerChrysler or Weyland Yutani.

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In the West they'd come up with some terrible meaningless name like Stellantis, but Japan has names like Bandai Namco, Sega Sammy Holdings and Square Enix, so Honda Nissan might be a possibility.

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Hondasan for Japanese dad vibes

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] peppersky@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

Cars Bad, no matter who makes them

[-] godlessworm@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

oh yeah? what if the nissan was made by jesus christ? should i still "rIdE a BiCyClE"???

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, and you should convert it into a technical so that you can attack and dethrone god.

[-] ColonelKataffy@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

why would honda tie themselves to a failing car company?

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

Retool and make only Hondas at those Nissan factories? Idk

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

But in that case why frame this as a merger instead of a strip down?

[-] GrosMichel@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Save face and not freak out investors.

[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Mergers are rarely if ever a blending of two equals. Big fish eats little fish. On the rare occasion that a merger tries to preserve the hierarchy, culture, etc of each of the firms it usually ends disastrously.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Idk, I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of the industry

[-] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

I don't feel threatened by China. It's easy.

I remember when capitalists called it competition.

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

The only positive that could come out of this is some new sportscars. New Nissan GTR and Honda S2000 when?

Hopefully this means good Nissan but good

[-] BlueMagaChud@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

how's that Plaza Accord working out for you?

[-] jackmarxist@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Is this going to be like Boeing? Because Honda is pretty fucking good to be merging with Nissan.

[-] BobDole@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

I’ve rented a couple Nissans over the past few years and they sucked shit.

[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Doing a press announcement and doing their best to look like wojaks

[-] Tychoxii@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

I think it's doubtful they'll be successful with this fusion dance, they haven't even gone supersaiyan.

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

I could see honda frontiers selling well in the united states of trucks

[-] ryepunk@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

Nope, the American will never accept a foreign made truck. The Toyota had some impeccable indestructible trucks and Ford and Chevy outsold them. At this point you need to sell a truck the size of a school bus to satisfy the average American truck buyer.

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

as one of thousands of assholes that has such an undying affection for older, light duty trucks that I own one... yes we would. america defacto banned light duty pickups in the 70s with the chicken tax, which is why that market segment vanished by the 90s. I have one of the last ones and it is about 12 months from qualifying for "antique" status.

everybody as his brother asks me about it and if I'm interested in selling.

the US can't compete with foreign made when it comes to smaller, efficient anything so the regulators stepped in to do protectionism 50 years ago. that's why the only trucks you can find anymore of 4 door, tiny bed monstrosities and a shitload of actual tradesmen are rocking old pickups or fuckin awd subaru hatchbacks.

[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Red states are starting to make K trucks street legal as a way to have more work truck options available to folks, just completely ridiculous federal policy in this area.

[-] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

Not quite true as the Tacoma and Tundra are always among the top 20 best selling cars in America. They aren't perceived as foreign trucks because they are actually as American as they come- they're built in San Antonio and designed for the US market. I often see them used as chudmobiles- full Trump regalia decked out in US flags, Punisher logos, blue line and NRA stickers galore. But yeah, the big 3 domestic trucks do outsell them overall.

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

Toyota doesn't have trucks sitting on lots. People love those fucking things in America.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

I live in a place where way too many people drive pickups, and I've been seeing a lot more new Toyota trucks in the last few years.

I think it's because they're almost as big as an F-150 now and they sell them with factory lift kits and all the luxury crap that makes them look like any other dumbass Chevy Childsmusher 1500.

[-] BobDole@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I see Toyota trucks all the time. They’re usually scratched up with toolboxes and shit in the bed. The American trucks are the pristine “pavement princesses” covered in chud stickers.

(I drive an old used Toyota sedan for reference; this isn’t me trying to blow myself)

[-] gueybana@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Tbf the f150, the most ameriburger vehicle of all, has 22 mpg.

We already have the Frontier, it doesn't really sell amazingly but it sells.

I wish we'd get the international market frontier. But instead we're stuck with the same 20 year old car, but with a face lift in like 2020.

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that's why I think a Honda Frontier with a Honda drivetrain would sell well. Plenty of people want a basic simple small truck but might balk at Nissans due to reputation, earned or otherwise. The Ridgeline isn't quite truck enough so slotting in a body on frame, solid rear axle option to the line-up seems like a home run.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
116 points (98.3% liked)

news

23658 readers
575 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS