661
Luna (slrpnk.net)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 92 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I think the impact that created the moon is the main reason why there's life on this planet. That impact also mixed up the heavier metals and liberated enough phosphorus making the composition of earth's crust unique. Also the two metal cores fused and made it oversized, prompting the difference between the rotation of the Earth and the core, making the magnetic field that protects our atmosphere possible...

So yeah, I'm definitely not optimistic about life on different planets....

[-] halykthered@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 weeks ago

But hey, if it happened once, maybe we'll get to find some remains of another system to which this happened as well. Or maybe, someday, someone else will find ours. Or perhaps gravity is the only force keeping us from drifting off the surface of our rock, preventing us from falling into the darkest void for eternity, with the vain hope that your frozen corpse will someday land in someone else's yard, like a cosmic frisbee.

[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

The universe is large enough that similar combinations of events could have happened elsewhere too. But it's also large enough that those places are most likely further from us than our species will ever travel.

[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps too far to ever travel, but if we can detect it to at least be aware of their existence, then that might be enough for us. Just an answer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

And I'm sure the strong tidal pull likely had an accelerating effect on the early stages of the emergence of life, since the first steps would have basically had to crash into each other in water without having any other way to move. There are many other ways for that to happen on the "millions of years" time scale, but the amount the moon moves our water has got to have had a notable effect.

[-] Scribbd@feddit.nl 7 points 2 weeks ago

Earth is and always has been the giant beaker of chemicals that has one of those magnetic stirrers in it, thanks to the moon.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

One of the current theories of life formation involves thermal vents, which provide energy and motion (and necessary chemicals) without any need for lunar tides.

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I suppose I could have made a list of the various other ways, like the water cycle, thermal vents, and the effects of surface level winds on water below the surface too. But even given all those methods, anything else that helps move water around faster is gonna have some effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 77 points 2 weeks ago

In the fifth or sixth book of the Foundation series they follow a map to Earth that mentions a planet with huge rings and a planet circled by a giant moon. Throughout the universe, this combination was so unique you could identify the home of humanity among trillions of planets.

It's a weird book but I'm glad I read it.

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 2 weeks ago

Well, Foundation and Earth is the fifth book of the Foundation trilogy... of course it's weird.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, the Douglas Adams approach.

[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Similar to the five book Hitchhiker's Guide trilogy.

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, but the Foundation trilogy has seven books.
The last two being prequels.

(Also it's connected to the Galactic Empire trilogy, which does have three books, but was published in reverse order, and the Robot series, a four book duology not to be confused with Asimov's other robot books, though it's set in the same universe, and also to The End of Eternity, which is set in a different timeline altogether but is sort of a prequel to the whole shebang.)

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

And the idea of such a big moon was part of why it was largely thought of as an unfounded myth.

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

And it shows how Asimov had zero conception of how ridiculously huge the galaxy is, though that's just the storylines being a product of their time, probably.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

Or he was writing a fiction and knew he could play fast and loose with scientific laws.

Asimov wrote non-fiction books about astronomy; I'm sure he knew as much about it as you do.

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, I read the whole series recently and for some details that bothered me looked up the how the science on that progressed. I can't give you exact examples as I don't remember details, but I do know that there's a bunch of very mistaken assumptions that the series is built on that he had no way of knowing back when he started and had to keep going forward (remember, the series was written over several decades starting in the fourties) and also a bunch of errors where he could have known better but just messed up.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Okay. We both agree that you have access to information that some who died in the last century wouldn't have known.

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, obviously? That's not what I was saying at all. I think you misinterpreted my original post in a big way.

[-] callyral@pawb.social 69 points 2 weeks ago

Well technically Charon is bigger relative to its parent body but, y'know, Pluto isn't a planet...

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 33 points 2 weeks ago

A-ha! So the real reason Pluto got degraded was so Earth could keep it's biggest moon status!

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 weeks ago

Big Moon has gotta be behind this!

[-] Strobelt@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Always making waves...

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 weeks ago

Due to tidal effects the moon is slowly getting further away from the earth, so we're living at just the right time to see such spectacular eclipses

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Just add some really massive thrusters to the Artemis 3 payload manifest and nudge it back every so often

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

The Whack theory still has some important exceptions, which is why there’s a Double-Whack theory, which also has exceptions.

“The moon was created this way” is an opinion.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago

"hypothesis", rather than "opinion", no?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 15 points 2 weeks ago

So evangelion was right?

Jokes aside, the probability of moonlike-moons forming in earthlike-planets should be added to drake's equation and see what that begets.

Might explain a lot of the silence, at least for life as we know it

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The drake equation is a bogus probability that really means ultimately nothing. I wouldn't put stock in anything it says.

[-] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 5 points 2 weeks ago
[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

The Drake Equation was not really meant to be used. The original purpose of the Drake Equation was to drum up conversations surrounding the first SETI. All it really did was condense everything someone should look for in a possibly human habitable world where aliens may exist. We have much better ways to calculate and search now.

[-] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 3 points 2 weeks ago

I understand, thank you

[-] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago

But the moon size thing isn’t a coincidence, thats part of what makes solar eclipses so rare, the moon needs to be at the correct distance when it passes in front of the sun or it isn’t as impressive, and it does do that some times.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Total* solar eclipses. Mars has solar eclipses, just not very impressive ones since the shadows are so small, but you could actually look directly at the sun to see the shadow at that distance, without fucking up your eyes

Do they bother calling them "eclipses" or "transits?" Like we don't say Mercury or Venus eclipse the sun.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LemoineFairclough@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago
[-] rekabis@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

There are some schools of thought that say that a large moon like ours should be a part of the Drake Equation, because without which life would have a very hard time even on supposed “garden planets”.

Another factor that is likely to affect civilizations is an easy source of energy, like oil. We got lucky, in that the evolutionary development in Lignin in plants - and the several million years needed for bacteria to catch up and be able to break it down - are what created those massive deposits of organic matter that became trapped deep in the Earth and modified into oil. Without that oil we are unlikely to have reached several milestones, including transportation, population levels, trade, high technology, and even access to space. And this would start affecting us several hundred years back, with steam engines.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I like to imagine an alien "watcher" with a lifespan measured in billions of years who has been hanging out in our solar system since its formation. It finally decides to contact us humans and tells us that it saw our moon being formed from another planet smashing into Earth billions of years ago. "Yeah, we know - wanna see the movie we created showing it?"

[-] SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago

I love that one of the characters in Iain Banks' "Transition" tries to find aliens by spotting airtight -looking vessels (ships, vans,..) during solar eclipses, for this exact reason.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] estra@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sometimes I wonder if the moons size / existence is one of the reasons why life is even possible in the first place - Maybe aliens would know what it's like to have a moon a quarter the diameter of the home planet because otherwise life has no chance, maybe life is even more likely on dual planet systems like Pluto and Cheron, maybe that's already too similar in size and life has no chance, maybe the median sentient creature in the universe has experienced a tide, or maybe not - anyways I dunno that much about exoplanets or astronomy in general so every thing I've said might be completely bonkers xD

[-] Mpatch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It sounds more like the moon is just earth spare parts. Like when I put things back together. Always a bin of extras that hang around in the back of the truck, sliding around and what not.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
661 points (99.0% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4092 readers
12 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Image descriptions and plain text captions of written content are expected of all screenshots. Here are some image text extractors (I looked these up quick and will gladly take FOSS recommendations):

-web

-iOS

-android

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS