[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago

that was the previous generation :)

10
[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
19
pet eater (sh.itjust.works)
[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 90 points 2 days ago

let's say that VPNs are compromised and "they" know that you're downloading "illegally"

in order to prosecute, "they" have to prove you're a pirate and show how they know

would they compromise their backDoor to go after a tiny pirate?

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

i see that years or decades of frustration in the face of "i have nothing to hide" comes off as insanity to you :/

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

the pejorative "armchair expert" wouldn't apply here as the fieldwork is essentially chair based.

:)

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

talk to the paw 🥱

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"arguments" alone don't suffice.

a demonstration of how easy it is to use proton drive (to share videos and millions of photos she's going to dump on relatives who are barely interested in seeing another baby photo) and protonMail would be more convincing.

Privacy interfaces have evolved to be attractive to lambda users.

when it comes to your wife uploading your daughters photographs to google servers, she can't decide alone: you share the authority (but would this argument matter in a marriage? No?

would having a protonMail matter if the photographs are attachments and recipients have gmail? No.

good luck. Not an easy task

19
ronkey dhubarb (sh.itjust.works)
[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago

yes, online, on these internets, defending yourself is a waste of your time and energy.

Let's say that they were rude. Wouldn't it be a better solution to block them and go do something else, instead of spending all this time on these 2 threads and pMessages and screenshots

What were you defending yourself from? A disagreement on a lemmy thread 🙄 on a relatively inconsequential subject 🤦

Daily life is abrasive enough; if lemmy became another source of stress for you, just cut it off.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

tempest in a teacup

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago

did you too lose your earingle?

79
sh.itjust.works (sh.itjust.works)
27
bagkcround (sh.itjust.works)
6
6
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by merde@sh.itjust.works to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works

edit: this was just to study region-specific prompting

strangely when the guidance is low (2), the result is closer to what was prompted

of course, every model had its own ideas about what a soccer ball may be. I started with "football" but that gave some american results

15
merde alors (sh.itjust.works)
45
7
smarties (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 weeks ago by merde@sh.itjust.works to c/cursed_ai@lemmy.ml

better cursed than never

570

Late on Friday afternoon, Justice Alexandre de Moraes – who has been engaged in a dispute with X’s owner, Elon Musk, since April – ordered the “immediate, complete and total suspension of X’s operations” in the country, “until all court orders … are complied with, fines are duly paid, and a new legal representative for the company is appointed in the country”.

He gave Brazil’s National Telecommunications Agency 24 hours to enforce the decision. Once notified, the agency must pass the order on to the more than 20,000 broadband internet providers in the country, each of which must block X.

In an interview with the TV channel Globonews, the agency’s president, Carlos Manuel Baigorri, said the order had already been passed on to internet providers.

“Since we’re talking about more than 20,000 companies, each will have its own implementation time, but … we expect that probably over the weekend all companies will be able to implement the block,” he said.

Justice Moraes also summoned Apple and Google to “implement technological barriers to prevent the use of the X app by users of the iOS and Android systems” and to block the use of virtual private network (VPN) applications.

The decision imposes a daily fine of R$50,000 (£6,800) on individuals and companies that attempt to continue using X via VPN.

6
(sh.itjust.works)

view more: next ›

merde

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
edc