530

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/6377102

If they can elect a felon to the white house, so could we.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The real question is why hasn't Biden pardoned Luigi but he did pardon the child slavery guy

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Are you for real? He’s the leader of the Justice Department that charged Luigi with terrorism in the first place.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

I mean it's a rhetorical point, I'm not surprised that the Biden regime is going to execute a freedom fighter instead of one of the demiurgic archons tormenting us

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

FTR the president, who leads the executive branch of government, doesn't lead the justice department, which is in the judicial branch, and until Trump 2016 that separation was almost always respected.

https://www.havefunwithhistory.com/the-3-branches-of-government/

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Technically, sure, but the DOJ is overseen by the AG, who is appointed by the President. That ‘balance’ created in 1870 is not well checked by our system.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're moving the goal posts. You said the president lead the justice department, which is false.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agreed that you’re technically correct. Just like POTUS technically has no authority over SCOTUS, but some presidents get to appoint more justices than others.

You’re saying there’s a system. I’m agreeing and saying the system is flawed.

Because it’s a big club and you ain’t in it

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

You know why. Biden, like all presidents, doesn't care about the actual heroes (Snowden, Manning, Luigi) and cares about people would make heroes required.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Eli Manning is a true hero 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

We know why.

[-] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Ever meet someone weeks out from retirement? No fucks given.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Can you pardon someone who hasn't been found guilty yet?

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

the president can in fact pardon someone before they are convicted of a crime! Nixon famously pardoned by Ford

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

And more recently we learned when Trump pardoned Joe Arpaio after he was convicted, but before he was sentenced, that a pardon doesn't vacate a conviction.

[-] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago

as someone who has no idea what luigi u are talking about, i will just leave this here
picture of luigi
~"here~ ~i~ ~go!"~

[-] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

If he's elected, he can pardon himself using trump's changes can't he? (Across the pond, so donno)

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks to Trump, we now know that Luigi could be elected while imprisoned.

He wouldn’t need Trump’s changes. A US president has unlimited power of pardon of federal (not state) charges, with the exceptions of impeachment related crime and self-pardons. The President can even pardon citizens before they’re charged with a crime, like Carter did for the Vietnam draft-dodgers.

Trump’s immunity change by SCOTUS blurs the self-pardon line a bit by allowing POTUS to commit crimes without repercussion as long as they are “official acts,” whatever that means. That change is more forward-thinking, making it far easier for his team to plan his crimes.

[-] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Thank you for the explanation!

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No problem!

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

The orange man didn’t make any such changes. He’s just the only president who has considered doing it.

[-] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

No, continuing to consent to, participate, and put faith in the sham that is electoral politics is the compromise.

The fact that people see the impact of direct action, and can't resist the urge of their indoctrination to force it in to the box that is the constructs and systems that they're familiar, and therefore comfortable with, even in an expressly leftist community, is frustrating as hell.

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 1 week ago

Your wrong. Mockery is a valid weapon.

this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
530 points (96.8% liked)

Lefty Memes

4637 readers
714 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS