468
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dink@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I feel like it’s almost too generic to be useful. All the “standard” attachments make it a thing that already exists (and those things are usually much stable and supported). If they get enough 3rd party attention prior to launch, that could change.

I wish they would have spent the time and effort just committing to the smartphone idea. Linux and the Linux community could greatly benefit from more open source smartphone devices.

[-] Mars2k21@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Cool emulation machine and design, even if it isn't the most practical thing ever.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago
[-] kehet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 13 hours ago

Well that looks cool. I just hope I would have use for such device.

I wonder how they plan to keep updating this Mechanix OS after initial sales slow down

[-] dorumon@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

It's going to be just like my pocket chip and die quickly after in terms of software support. Where I had to run my own hacks and also run archive debian repositories for the hardware itself only for the flash to die a year afterwards. I can say though it was the coolest device I had and hacking it was really neat especially with the UI and scaling apps on the device.

[-] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 37 points 20 hours ago

I see a lot of negativity in the comments. And yeah, this thing probably isn’t something I’m going to get, but at least they are trying something that isn’t a generic rectangle of glass like all the others. I miss the days of fun gadgets.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago

Fun useful gadgets. A gadget for the sake of a gadget is just another word for "e-waste".

[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

Yeah I’m just tired of seeing projects like this get abandoned quickly

[-] netvor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I get it, but a gentle reminder, often the best way for society to have an awesome projects is to have a lot of projects.

[-] humble_pete_digger@lemm.ee 8 points 19 hours ago

I like the generic rectangle block of glass.
Don't understand why they insist on a physical keyboard.

[-] DeaDvey@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

I much prefer physical keyboards and find it difficult to use touchscreen, so a mobile, qwerty keyboard sounds great to me.

[-] humble_pete_digger@lemm.ee 1 points 58 minutes ago

What phones u guys been using for the last 15 years? I haven't seen slide out keyboards for about that long

[-] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 2 points 18 hours ago

I don’t mind it, but I also don’t hate that people are trying something new! Maybe it fails, but maybe it’s awesome!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago

What I like about this is that I could theorhetically install a non-QWERTY keyboard instead of being locked to such an inefficient layout. Yes, eventually you can learn to touch type, but learning it would be nice to have the keys since it will be a nonstandard layout at that size & when you hand it off to other folks, it’d be completely unexpected to hit q & get a '.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

I wonder who this is made for?

The article calls it a "smartphone sized pocket computer", but that describes smartphones too; they already are pocket computers. And they've had decades of design and development behind them.

So... This device has a tiny touchscreen, and a keyboard, rather than having the whole thing being a touchscreen. So instead it has a modular bottom half... Which... Sounds like it's trying to solve a problem that would've been a problem in like... The 90s, maybe, but has been solved by using... A touchscreen that can change the type of input it is flexibly, like smartphones do.

It can't call, like a smartphone, despite being a smartphone sized device. It has USB A 2.0 sockets and an Ethernet socket... Which makes it once again sound incredibly out-dated, like a device found in a time capsule, because USB C is smaller and faster than USB A 2.0, and can potentially be used for damn near anything. Which includes connecting to the Internet.

Its battery looks very weak. Its CPU looks very weak. It has a tiny amount of RAM, and a tiny amount of storage. It is outclassed by any affordable, midrange smartphone, at nearly the same price too (if you avoid big brand names).

[-] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

For people who like a concept more than practicality. There’s maybe a handful use cases that this specific device fits in that isn’t covered better by existing tech, but I guarantee if that thing actually gets kickstarted and arrives severely delayed in several years, it’ll show up in a couple YouTube videos with people sort of uncertain what to use it for, and in the vast majority of cases it’ll end up in some drawers after having been used a few hours tops.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

My thoughts exactly. I've seen several such devices already, probably the most expensive and over-designed one being the Apple VR, and it's always the same story.

[-] EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml 11 points 23 hours ago

This device has a tiny touchscreen, and a keyboard, rather than having the whole thing being a touchscreen.

That's awesome. I still miss my Blackberry Passport (keyboard and large 1:1 screen).

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Michal@programming.dev 7 points 23 hours ago

Full-size usb, Ethernet and keyboard mean you can use it as a Linux computer, install arbitrary debian packages, run shell scripts, python scripts, and you don't need any dongles. This is the differential factor. You can't do the same on a smartphone, and it's not supposed to be a smartphone. Why would you need a separate sim card when you can simply tether Internet from your phone?

I get that this device isn't for you, but there are people who don't want to write and maintain apps through apps stores and simply want to copy simple scripts into a small device they can have with them. It's a niche market and good for them for trying to fill that niche.

I wonder what they use for charging port if not usb c...

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

You can do all that with USB C and a touch keyboard. There is no good reason under the sun to make a device that is this dated in concept.

Whatever the market is they're trying to fill, it'll be so extremely niche that this product is already a failure. It's not the first time some kind of ultra niche product from kickstarter failed before launch because except for a small handful even cared.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mactan@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago

this would have been really cool 15 years ago

[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Funny story. LG made something with a similar concept about 10 years ago and it never really took off. The LG G5 was a modular smart phone that was supposed to have a bunch of cool modules, but they never came to fruition.

I had one, but mostly because I loved having a swappable battery. Never had to charge my phone, I would just have a spare battery charging on my desk and I would swap it out before I left the house.

[-] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

Jolla had similar concept too at 2013. I had one and back then it was really, really nice phone. Maybe not in a sense that flagship models from big vendors were, but I really enjoyed the UI and modular options was a huge selling point at least for myself. Then they started to work with a tablet which failed on pretty much all fronts and the whole company practically disappeared.

[-] TheTurner@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

Motorola had a similar phone. It was cool at the time, but just never took off. It was the Moto Z series.

[-] Solrac@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

3gb RAM? 32gb emmc? This feels a bit like a raspberry pi project. Up the specs at least 6gb to at least no[t look like yet another microdeck with emulators, please... I like the concept, but as is, it leaves plenty to be desired

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 3 points 20 hours ago

Netbooks need to come back with modern hardware.

If I need an ultra-portable computer one in a usable form factor would be amazing.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
468 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

48885 readers
984 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS