396
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Now if only I could get it to play nice with my Chromecast... But I'm sure that's on Google.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 34 minutes ago

Or shitty mDNS implementations

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 14 hours ago

accessibility is honestly the first good use of ai. i hope they can find a way to make them better than youtube's automatic captions though.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 hour ago

The app Be My Eyes pivoted from crowd sourced assistance to the blind, to using AI and it's just fantastic. AI is truly helping lots of people in certain applications.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 hours ago

There are other good uses of AI. Medicine. Genetics. Research, even into humanities like history.

The problem always was the grifters who insist calling any program more complicated than adding two numbers AI in the first place, trying to shove random technologies into random products just to further their cancerous sales shell game.

The problem is mostly CEOs and salespeople thinking they are software engineers and scientists.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 hours ago
[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Spoiler, they will! I use FUTO keyboard on android, it's speech to text uses an ai model and it is amazing how great it works. The model it uses is absolutely tiny compared to what a PC could run so VLC's implementation will likely be even better.

[-] yonder@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago

I know Jeff Geerling on Youtube uses OpenAIs Whisper to generate captions for his videos instead of relying on Youtube's. Apparently they are much better than Youtube's being nearly flawless. I would have a guess that Google wants to minimize the compute that they use when processing videos to save money.

[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

I am still waiting for seek previews

[-] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago
[-] DepressedMan@reddthat.com 8 points 14 hours ago

Perhaps we could also get a built-in AI tool for automatic subtitle synchronization?

[-] r_deckard@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

I've been waiting for ~~this~~ break-free playback for a long time. Just play Dark Side of the Moon without breaks in between tracks. Surely a single thread could look ahead and see the next track doesn't need any different codecs launched, it's technically identical to the current track, there's no need to have a break. /rant

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 18 points 18 hours ago
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Thank you for your service

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 8 points 16 hours ago
load more comments (6 replies)

I know people are gonna freak out about the AI part in this.

But as a person with hearing difficulties this would be revolutionary. So much shit I usually just can’t watch because open subtitles doesn’t have any subtitles for it.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The most important part is that it’s a local ~~LLM~~ model running on your machine. The problem with AI is less about LLMs themselves, and more about their control and application by unethical companies and governments in a world driven by profit and power. And it’s none of those things, it’s just some open source code running on your device. So that’s cool and good.

[-] technomad@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 day ago

Also the incessant ammounts of power/energy that they consume.

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 13 points 18 hours ago

Running an llm llocally takes less power than playing a video game.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 9 points 13 hours ago

The training of the models themselves also takes a lot of power usage.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 16 hours ago

This is great timing considering the recent Open Subtitles fiasco.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 15 hours ago
[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 14 hours ago

Open Subtitles now only allows 5 downloads per 24 hours per IP. You have to pay for more.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 40 minutes ago

Oof. Well, they have to make money somehow. And probably there were people abusing the site. It wouldn't surprise me for example if many did not cache the subtitles but had them on demand for videos.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

Kind of annoying when searching for the exact sub file for the movie file you have.

Especially when half those subtitle files appear to be AI generated anyway, or have weird Asian gambling ads shoved in.

Glad MKV seems to be the standard now, and include subs from the original sources.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)
[-] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 20 hours ago

I don't mind the idea, but I would be curious where the training data comes from. You can't just train them off of the user's (unsubtitled) videos, because you need subtitles to know if the output is right or wrong. I checked their twitter post, but it didn't seem to help.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 16 points 18 hours ago

subtitles aren't a unique dataset it's just audio to text

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 12 points 16 hours ago

They may have to give it some special training to be able to understand audio mixed by the Chris Nolan school of wtf are they saying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

I hope they're using Open Subtitles, or one of the many academic Speech To Text datasets that exist.

[-] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 86 points 1 day ago

Et tu, Brute?

VLC automatic subtitles generation and translation based on local and open source AI models running on your machine working offline, and supporting numerous languages!

Oh, so it's basically like YouTube's auto-generatedd subtitles. Never mind.

[-] neme@lemm.ee 61 points 1 day ago

Hopefully better than YouTube's, those are often pretty bad, especially for non-English videos.

[-] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 20 hours ago

Youtube's removal of community captions was the first time I really started to hate youtube's management, they removed an accessibility feature for no good reason, making my experience with it significantly worse. I still haven't found a replacement for it (at least, one that actually works)

[-] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 20 hours ago

and if you are forced to use the auto-generated ones remember no [__] swearing either! as we all know disabled people are small children who need to be coddled!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 61 points 1 day ago

All hail the peak humanity levels of VLC devs.

FOSS FTW

[-] Alice@beehaw.org 32 points 1 day ago

My experience with generated subtitles is that they're awful. Hopefully these are better, but I wish human beings with brains would make them.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 23 points 22 hours ago

subtitling by hand takes sooooo fucking long :( people who do it really are heroes. i did community subs on youtube when that was a thing and subtitling + timing a 20 minute video took me six or seven hours, even with tools that suggested text and helped align it to sound. your brain instantly notices something is off if the subs are unaligned.

[-] onnekas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 57 minutes ago

You can use tools like whishper to pre generate the subtitles. You will have pretty accurate su titles at the right times. Then you can edit the errors and maybe adjust the timings.

But I guess this workflow will work with VLC in the future as well

[-] boomzilla@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

Jup. That should always be paid work. It takes forever. I tried to subtitle the first Always Sunny Episode. I got very nice results. Especially when they talked over another. But to get the perfect timing when one line was about to get hidden and the other appears was tedious af. All in all the 25 minutes cost me about the same number of hours. It's just not feasible.

[-] Alice@beehaw.org 14 points 21 hours ago

Oh shit, I knew it was tedious but it sounds like I seriously underestimated how long it takes. Good to know, and thanks for all you've done.

Sounds to me like big YouTubers should pay subtitlers, but that's still a small fraction of audio/video content in existence. So yeah, I guess a better wish would be for the tech to improve. Hopefully it's on the right track.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
396 points (98.5% liked)

Opensource

1533 readers
610 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS