65
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by MITM0@lemmy.world to c/opensourcegames@lemmy.ml

Do we need a standalone Libre/OpenSource Game-Store/Hub ??? (similar to Athenaeum)

where we simply aggregate all the FOSS games in one place along with their mods & links to their assets (Plus methods to fund those libre-gamedevs)

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 19 points 1 month ago

I think flathub pretty much does this.

[-] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

That does provide a delivery mechanism, but misses out on the community that is suggested by OP.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 6 points 1 month ago

Dang, I completely missed that. Time to go to sleep. Good night!

[-] MITM0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Atheneaum was one such game-store & it utilized FlatPaks

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Technically itch.io is afaik FOSS, but it doesn't cater to open-source games exclusively.

The Libregaming.org community has brainstormed quite extensively about what you propose and some of it is summarized here: https://libregaming.org/reports/game-launcher-concept/ (partially outdated by now)

Personally I think a fork of the Heroic Games launcher could be a good base for such a game store.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Absolutely not, because the concept itself doesn't make any damn sense. A service that aggregates a bunch of Free Software in one place is called a "repository," not a "store!"

The framing of issues is important, and to cede control of that framing to proprietary software publishers by adopting their terminology would be a mistake.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I guess it depends on the meaning of "store" maybe if it is like a stock room?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The key is that describing a Free Software repository as a "store" is a bad idea because not being a store is what makes it categorically superior to all stores.

[-] MITM0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Ok then, how about a "Hub" ?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Much better!

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Wikipedia suggests f-droid is a "free and open-source app store."

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

If only there was some mechanism to encourage developers to make games free at least after making some profit/payback. With such a mechanism, the store could develop financially. But personally, I haven't come up with anything like that yet.

[-] MITM0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe a new type of FOSS licence ? Or just plain-ol guilt-tripping

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 1 month ago

I mean anyone can make a proprietary game and then put it under an open source license later. Its why people push companies to do this if they are going to abandon the game. One problem is sometimes they are fine with the game but they want to use the ip in succeeding games so the ip has to be stripped out.

[-] JustVik@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, I hadn't thought about such motivation. In this case, maybe it is possible to at least release only the code under an open/free license.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 1 month ago

and that is sorta what happens. I think doom is like this.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Wasn't that the intention of having copyright last only 13-15 years? That the works would enter the public domain, free for all to play with? Just because it is a digital good doesn't mean this shouldn't apply.

Unfortunately our government has been purchased by the 1% with the surplus labor value stolen from us. We are getting taxed without representation.

[-] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago

We already have an appstore for Linux, it's built in and a gui is all one needs, along side methods of putting paid and proprietary apps in too

But, android is lacking, f-droid has no such capability and I don't think you can put proprietary apps in

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Well, uh
There's at least a dozen, not all have a GUI, very few of them have payment mechanisms. There's so much variety that I cannot with confidence place which one you're referring to. Maybe Gnome Software? Dpkg can technically do it but it's on the maintainer to build in the mechanism to phone home to a third-party server and allow/deny functionality based on payment status.
Rereading your post, I think you might have meant that paid and proprietary deployment methods are needed, but proprietary packages are very much already a thing, and the reason that Ubuntu gained so much headway over Debian, in that they assume you do in fact want your wireless card to work. They're also the ones with the esm payment mechanisms, where they can turn off repository channels if you cancel your plan.

[-] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

why link to the assets?

but those are all reasonable features that could be added to lutris.

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
65 points (93.3% liked)

OpenSourceGames

2849 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS