1441

His grand vision remains to leave Mastodon users in control of the social network, making their own decisions about what content is allowed or what appears in their timelines.

I don't use Mastadon cause I don't care for micro-blogging, but nevertheless, I like this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chozo@fedia.io 176 points 3 weeks ago

While this is a good move, I don't think John Mastodon was making anywhere near the kind of money to turn into the next Musk or Zuck to begin with.

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 91 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 48 points 3 weeks ago
[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Zhang Wei can change his name to whatever the fuck he wants he'll still ve Zhang Wei TikTok

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stinerman@midwest.social 52 points 3 weeks ago

You can see exactly what he made in 2023. The report is available here.

€60k

[-] slampisko@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

I read that url as blog.johnmastodon.org and for a second I was seriously wondering if that name was real lol

[-] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 34 points 3 weeks ago

Not now, but in the future that was a possibility.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

mass market media can only understand the world through the lens of mass market media

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 126 points 3 weeks ago

I have recently been using it more to connect with others on a new subject, but now for the first time ever on the internet since early 00's, we are all owners of it ourselves. All the great new stuff was always owned by others and frankly I'm sick of it.

I never even liked twitter. Then I followed #nature and #bloomscrolling on mastodon for a while and my home feed was a feast of beautiful pics. So now there's one use for me for microblogging. Neat! Mastodon does what it says it does and even offers 'default' instances. I'd love for some GO's to help reach that donation goal quicker, so we can all get with the program and ditch corpo social media. -Why doesn't my library host it's own peertube?? #MakeLibrariesGreatAgain

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sighofannoyance@lemmy.world 91 points 3 weeks ago

Why is there this very loud chorus of people touting bluesky as alternative to twitter instead of the far superior Mastodon?

Bluesky you are basically swapping a tyrant against a benevolent dictator, that dictator can become corrupted or sell bluesky to Musk Elon later on.... That is not a solution that is more like procrastination.

[-] RightEdofer@lemmy.ca 58 points 3 weeks ago

Because BlueSky has designers and Mastodon is a nightmare for new users. Same reason a lot of “superior” open source apps never take off. Devs are rarely also good designers. Until we start caring about normal people it will stay that way.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Is this actually true? The UIs don't seem very different to me. What is it about mastodon's design that's bad?

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Just the UX rather than the UI. It’s also missing some features like quote tweets. But it can be confusing to onboard either your own instance and know that your discoverable or to join an instance and know how discoverable you are.

Like I am a career man in IT, servers, and networking. I have no idea if I were to run my own instance, who exactly on the network would be able to see my public posts

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] rascalnikov@literature.cafe 24 points 3 weeks ago

I think it is because Bluesky is simpler and easier to understand, as well as more familiar to use than mastodon. My favorite streamer said he is reluctant to move to the fediverse because of how different it is and the learning curve it has to it. I'm also, like, EXTREMELY new here and understand but once you start to get used to it, its easy to see how the fediverse and this "New Social" wave is far superior; the only hard part is getting "normies" to try it long enough to build enough familiarity to see that.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Is it just the choosing-a-home-server thing, or something else?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 20 points 3 weeks ago

bluesky has more funding for self-promotion.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 3 weeks ago

Because Bluesky has a marketing budget.

"We need to get away from these billionaire-ran social media sites! Ooh, a new billionaire-ran social media site!"

Same with the people who fled reddit and set their communities up on Discord...

[-] Dragon@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It has more features, and most people don't know why Mastadon might be better. The average person doesn't even know what a server is.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Why is there this very loud chorus of people touting bluesky as alternative to twitter instead of the far superior Mastodon?

What makes you assume Mastodon is superior as a solution for the people who are flocking to Bluesky in droves?

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 50 points 3 weeks ago

Copy-pasting a comment from Aurich (Ars Staffer):

I set up the Ars Mastodon instance, and speaking as a relatively educated and technically savvy person I found it extremely confusing. And the more I learned later the more I don't feel remotely bad about being confused, it's honestly pretty messy.

I put Ars on the main instance, and I think it was the right call. We're not going to maintain our own, at least at this time, and trusting a random instance that's very difficult to vet is kinda sketchy.

We ran a guest editorial a while back that I think really clearly outlines the various issues:

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/06/op-ed-why-the-great-twittermigration-didnt-quite-pan-out/

But you know, it's really okay. It doesn't have to be big, or popular or mainstream. As long as it survives and people like it? That's good enough.

I think going into an era of balkanization of social isn't the worst thing.

One of my complaints with Mastodon and similars is that you can't search only for posts of a specific instance, or temporarily mute a single instance from your feed. There's also some sort of "invisible wall" for Pleroma users (niche of a niche), as their public posts simply don't show up in public Mastodon searches, though I don't know whether that's a problem with Mastodon or Pleroma.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago

Now I am wondering if there is a way to blast a message out to various micro blog platforms at once. Kind of like Ryan's Woof idea from the office

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Microw@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago

The Mastodon devs have received a grant to work on a search/visibility tool in 2025, so I definitely expect developments there

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago

What does ceding control even mean? Mastodon, just like Lemmy, is federated - each instance has its own governance. It was never controlled by a single person to begin with.

He can cede control of the GitHub repository, I guess, but:

  1. That's giving the controls to the contributors, not the users.
  2. The article does not even hint at the existence of source code, and the announcement itself doesn't talk about changes in that aspect either, so I don't think that's what's happening here.
[-] stinerman@midwest.social 66 points 3 weeks ago

It was never controlled by a single person to begin with.

The computer program called Mastodon was (and still is for now) completely controlled by Eugen Rochko. In the future it will be controlled by a non-profit.

See this and this for more info.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] viking@infosec.pub 15 points 3 weeks ago

Someone is still in charge of the git account. No matter how many commits there are being made, unless the owner of the repo approves to merge them, it's not happening.

And sure, someone could create a fork that includes their changes if they aren't being merged, but then this separate fork might at some point lose compatibility with the original software. And on a purely semantic note, this fork wouldn't be the original mastodon either.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheOneAndOnly@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

152k to 1.5 milhouse is definitely an astronomical increase. Where does that number come from? For that matter...has he been funding all of this on his own up until this point?

[-] viking@infosec.pub 60 points 3 weeks ago

I agree that 1.5 milhouse is quite a lot.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 weeks ago

everything's coming up thrillho

[-] Vincente@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Like it, like Bluesky too, uninstall Twitter after using these apps for several days.

Reject any app that has an forced automated recommendation system

[-] breakingcups@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

I do wonder what prevents BlueSky from going the way Twitter did, though.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 42 points 3 weeks ago

Absolutely nothing. I fully expect it to follow a similar trajectory.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

Bluesky is still running on VC cash. We haven't seen how they plan on monetizing it yet, but if anything that is where their major fuckup will happen.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 26 points 3 weeks ago

The Internet needs fewer Stalins and Hitlers and more George Washingtons.

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago

More slave owners it is then!

[-] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 46 points 3 weeks ago

It is an imperfect system, but my comment was more about leaders not clinging to power to the detriment of society.

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago

I was just kidding. I understand what you meant. Monkey paw wish. Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it's refreshing to see someone not be an Absolute Dick™ on the internet for profit.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

We should not expect greatness from the men who create these corporations, they are not great men, they are not even good or especially intelligent men. They fell into their position by luck, the one in a million triers for whom circumstance clicked into position. The only thing that sets them apart and perhaps accounts for their success is how they are so consistently open to sycophancy and manipulation by the pack of cold and savage business graduates that flock to any form of success. When a person is against type, as seemingly is the case here, they stand out and just once in a while are capable of real greatness.

[-] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 14 points 3 weeks ago

The blog discussed progress on a "privacy-respecting search tool" that could be used to explore the entire Fediverse, a collection of independent social media networks that Mastodon connects to. That could make it possible to discover more content without depending on a "For You" algorithm mining user data.

Inshallah. Lack of search is my biggest gripe with Mastodon.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] crossdl@leminal.space 11 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not sure what the practicals of doing something like this will be, but it speaks a lot to who Eugen Rochko is.

He might also be an obtuse dick. I've gotten that vibe too. Still, good for him.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
1441 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

61433 readers
1001 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS