943
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by ShotDonkey@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new "king"

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it's an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 59 points 19 hours ago

I see a lot of good discussion here. I've been on proton for years now, using my own domain. While true that Andy is one of 5 board members, and it's a nonprofit etc, these statements are raising hairs on my neck, personally.

Does anyone have a good guide on problems associated with self-hosting email?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MTK@lemmy.world 48 points 18 hours ago

I wonder what is the percentage of nuts tech ceos.

Seems to be abnormally high

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 39 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Rich people tend not be good people in general

[-] funnyguy@lemmy.ml 8 points 15 hours ago

the ruling class will always support each other to protect their own class interests. they have what we lack - class solidarity. the only path forwards, which is the path of our own liberation, is uniting the proletariat and transitioning away from capitalism.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 15 hours ago

well this makes me slightly less fomo'd after going for tuta and mullvad- but i'm probably jinxing it rn ;-;

[-] egerlach@lemmy.ca 116 points 21 hours ago

The official @protonprivacy@mastodon.social account replied and doubled down

protonprivacy@mastodon.social - @jonah

Corporate capture of Dems is real. In 2022, we campaigned extensively in the US for anti-trust legislation.

Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote.

At a 2024 event covering antitrust remedies, out of all the invited senators, just a single one showed up - JD Vance.

1/2

protonprivacy@mastodon.social - @jonah By working on the front lines of many policy issues, we have seen the shift between Dems and Republicans over the past decade first hand.

Dems had a choice between the progressive wing (Bernie Sanders, etc), versus corporate Dems, but in the end money won and constituents lost.

Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.

2/2

(Less importantly, my response)

[-] tomatol@lemm.ee 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Insane that an official company account posted this.

Seems like they have deleted it now. Link is dead. Has there been any further comment?

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 110 points 21 hours ago

So sounds like their main concern is addressing the abuses of the FAANG monopolies, and only a Republican has talked to them about it.

I guess that is understandable in that very narrow lens, but it's a bit laughable considering how all the big tech companies are also cozying up to the Trump administration. All this has done for me is make me wary of anything Proton does now.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] idefix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Did they just remove their comments?

[-] relic_@lemm.ee 8 points 15 hours ago

This is a lot worse look than Andy saying something on Twitter. It's one thing for a board member to express an opinion as an individual, it's another to have an explicit corporate position... I don't even think the usual big tech suspects are this stupid to publicly support an administration like this.

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 40 points 20 hours ago

These fuckers act like they've never heard of Lina Khan. Let's see if Republicans try to replace her with someone with a stronger track record. Or, if they're so serious about tech competition maybe they'll get on board with net neutrality.

And look, I actually like Gail Slater (the Trump nominee that kicked off this thread). She's got some bona fides, and I welcome Republicans taking antitrust more seriously, and rolling back the damage done by Robert Bork and his adherents (including and probably most significantly Ronald Reagan).

But to pretend that Democrats are less serious about antitrust than Republicans ignores the huge moves that the Biden administration have made in this area, including outside of big tech.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] frozenspinach@lemmy.ml 40 points 20 hours ago

By my lights your response is quite effective, and while I appreciate the modesty I think it's appropriate to bring it over here:

Unfortunately, there's a line beyond which it's not okay to view a political party through one issue, and IMO the Republicans have crossed that line.

Privacy is a human rights issue. Republicans have signaled very strongly that they're going to violate more human rights. It's a net loss for privacy if that happens, even if big tech is a bit more restrained.

I'm sorry @protonprivacy, you've failed this test IMO. It would be one thing to say that given that the Republicans are in power, that Gail Slater is a good pick, but that's not the stance you took.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Link to the source.

Please dont post screenshots of text. Link to the source

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] plixel@programming.dev 54 points 20 hours ago

I literally just switched over from Google a few months ago and finally got all settled in. Just great. Does anyone know of any good alternative? I know Tuta exists, are there other options?

[-] pfr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 hours ago

I rate disroot as a good free alternative. Personally I use FastMail. It's paid, but you know how the saying goes, "if the service is free the you're the product".

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] HorikBrun@kbin.earth 282 points 1 day ago
load more comments (33 replies)
[-] b000rg@midwest.social 4 points 12 hours ago

Someone remind me, what's the first chapter in On Tyranny?

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 177 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Standing up for the little guy. Huh. Is that why billionaires and CEO are throwing literal tens of millions at Trump? Why he staffed his cabinet with billionaires? Why the center of his policy is tax cuts for the giga wealthy, at the expense of everyone else and the national debt, at a time where wealth inequality is literally tearing the country apart?

https://www.axios.com/2025/01/15/trump-windfall-fundraising-500-million

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/09/trump-wealth-cabinet-politicians-billionaires

These are objective, public facts. Like, I'm way more conservative than Lemmy’s center and willing acknowledge any good Trump does, but what reality is this guy living in? Who is this statement for? Who the heck does he think is using Proton services? He just pissed off his employees and customers for… What?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 35 points 19 hours ago

Another tech dipshit, whose wealth allows him to exist outside the realm of reality, bending the knee to an anti-democratic felon rapist so he can get some handouts.

Pathetic loser.

Growing up, if you had told me half or more of America would end up elevating a rapist to the presidency and prostrating themselves at his feet, I'd have laughed you out of the room. This nation has sunk LOW.

NordVPN is superior in every way. If you have ProtonVPN, dump it and swap to Nord.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 47 points 18 hours ago

NordVPN is superior in every way. If you have ProtonVPN, dump it and swap to Nord.

Have we learned nothing of the whole "spend millions upon millions on YouTube sponsorships" debacle? Nord absolutely is hiding something from us.

If you need to forward ports, AirVPN seems the best right now. Otherwise, Mullvad.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 38 points 20 hours ago

I wouldn’t say he embraced Trump, I’d say he is pro-breaking big tech, since that would probably help Proton.

Bernie Sanders even came out and said “hey, if Trump wants to cap credit card interest rates, I’m with him on that.”

Trump says a lot of shit to appeal to working class people. I don’t disagree with reminding him of what he said and holding him to those things, if he’s now going to be president.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 14 points 16 hours ago

Damn, this sucks. I fled Google for Proton and use it for email, files, and my own domain email.

[-] yamper@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

if you have your own domain, then moving off of proton is very painless

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Razzazzika@lemm.ee 55 points 21 hours ago

Why does he think Trump is against big tech when he's working side by side with Musk?

[-] ghurab@lemmy.world 38 points 20 hours ago

He doesn't. it's just lube to help his customers swallow his bullshit

[-] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 77 points 22 hours ago

Taking the time to remove Google, embraced proton mail ... Maybe it's time to just write letters and send meme post cards.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
943 points (96.7% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
2975 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS