12

On a technical level, how is TikTok being blocked/banned in the US?

Can I still sideload the app to my phone? Is it only being banned from the two big app stores? Is there a penalty for being found in possession of the software on US soil?

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

I believe I read that the ban prohibited new downloads but wouldn't stop existing users from continuing to use, however the parent company kinda put a middle finger up and said they would stop service in the US completely, probably by IP/geofencing? Take with grain of salt.

[-] elgordino@fedia.io 5 points 5 months ago

Yeah. ByteDance, the owners, are choosing to block US users to kick up the maximum fuss possible. From my understanding they didn’t need to, they just risked withering away because there would be no new users.

[-] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

To be honest, I'm surprised they care as much as they seem to- the US is such a small percentage of their potential user base. If my app lost 5% of my potential new users I'd be curious why, but I probably wouldn't put any effort into getting them back.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

No app store download and no hosting in the u.s. Even if they weren't blocking u s. Users the amount of video traffic suddenly hitting their servers outside the country would cripple their infrastructure and seriously hinder other Internet traffic. Since net neutrality doesn't exist anymore, ISPs can be paid to block it or seriously cripple it.

Still totally legal to install the app and access the content. However the same content will be reposted to other platforms which will be a great passive revenue stream for someone.

[-] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

How can ISPs tell what app is requesting data? Doesnt it all look the same on their end?

[-] randombullet@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

IP address and Domain Names

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

This is how.

[-] aggelalex@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Do as all the shithole countries do. Use a VPN.

[-] modus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I know how to get around it. I was curious to know the level at which it was being blocked. Is it the DNS, is it some kind of firewall...etc.

[-] aggelalex@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Tbh, it's tik tom blocking you, not the US, the US only requires the app stores to remove it. I think the easiest way for TikTok to find out where the request comes from is the client IP. And the only way to get around this is through a VPN. I don't exactly know though, I haven't seen a lot of technical stuff around it, and I'm not in the US to test it. I'd love to know if anyone else has a tip on this.

[-] tiny@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

There are multiple ways of doing this and I'm not sure which methods tik tok is using.

  • ip address there's a group called IANA that issues blocks of IP addresses to ISPs and there a companies like Maxmind that package that info. apps can create rules block requests based on that info that block requests coming from a specific location or return an error to the user

  • removing from the app store Companies can ask app stores to no longer offer downloads in a specific region and as the app updates it will become more busted over time

  • user information Based info provided by the user directly during sign up or from the social login a user used to sign up with tik tok

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Afaik you should still be able to sideload it and use the service with a VPN

[-] modus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

So are American ISPs being forced to block TikTok's server's IPs?

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

afaik the legislation doesn't include active blocking of a qualifying service's (which includes tiktok by name, but is not limited to only it or bytedance) traffic..

it only prohibits the distribution of their 'apps' (such as via google/apple 'stores')--this is the part that does most the heavy lifting, and hosting of their services within the u.s.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

No, US is not blocking it (there isn't even infrastructure in place for such a request, we don't have a "Great Firewall of China")

However, the VPN is required because reportedly TikTok themselves will stop allowing US based users to see content which is above and beyond what the law calls for

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

The firewall is the 3 megacorps that own all other ISPs. It just takes a phone call.

[-] neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Good thing we live a country with plenty of good honorable ISPs. Xfinity, Verizon and uhh... What's that other one that offers 10mbps for $200/m?

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I dont think any ISP will be forced to given that both the current and next WH have said they won't enforce a ban. If it goes dark, it'll be TikTok themselves blocking access

Edit: called it

[-] gens@programming.dev -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It will probably be removed from DNS (and appstores). Google IANA , and DNS if you want to know more.

PS Ofc the company itself will stop its services. It's not like they want beef with a whole country (any, not just US).

[-] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

I'm not an expert. Removing it from DNS would stop anyone using that DNS from accessing it, right? So if I'm in Australia, using a US DNS, I wouldn't be able to access it. And vice versa- Anyone in the US could just change their DNS to something outside the US.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Why do they care enough to listen? It isn't a US based company. I understand if they remove their US servers, but why do they have to block IPs?

Can't US users just get a VPN? Is this whole situation a ploy to ban VPNs and privacy?

[-] modus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yes, they can just use a VPN. I've told this to several people in my life and many of them write that off as being too difficult to figure out. I even gave my VPN un & pw to a family member with a link to download the app and they still just said "nah."

Some people just can't be bothered to try, I guess.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 5 months ago

I believe Google and Apple are to be fined if they don't remove the app from their stores.

We don't have the ability to nationally block the domains and IPs, so current users will still be able to access it. So you shouldn't need a VPN.

Android users could side load the app if they want.

[-] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago

Its a silly term to say installing from any app store that Google doesn't control

[-] Steve@communick.news 0 points 5 months ago

Not quite. You don't need any app store at all.
You literally download an APK file from a website or anywhere, then install it directly. Could even be a friend with a thumb drive. Doesn't matter how you get it, it's just a file.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -1 points 5 months ago

Yeah. Dont do that. Its how you install viruses.

Install through another app store like fdroid. Its the secure way to get APKs

[-] Nougat@fedia.io -1 points 5 months ago

Public DNS servers hosted in the US will get notified to delist the domain or direct it to an alternate IP. ISPs will get notified to route IP traffic elsewhere.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Source this information, because it is almost positively incorrect.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io -1 points 5 months ago

I have personal experience with backbone carriers.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I do to. We’re not talking about theoretically blocking access to a site nation wide. We’re talking about the TikTok ban, which doesn’t stipulate any sort of network blocking, it’s just a delisting from the app stores.

The government has never required dns providers to remove records for a domain, or required ISPs to null route traffic to IPs. That’s almost certainly a First Amendment issue, and I can only imagine that such an order would be immediately challenged in court.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_United_States

Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA)

In March 2008, the New York Times reported that a blocklist published by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), an agency established under the Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 and other federal legislation, included websites, so that US companies are prohibited from doing business with those websites and must freeze their assets. The blocklist had the effect that US-based domain name registrars must block those websites. According to the article, eNom, a private domain name registrar and Web hosting company operating in the US, disables domain names that appear on the blocklist.[38] It described eNom's disabling of a European travel agent's web sites advertising travel to Cuba, which appeared on the list.[39] According to the report, the US government claimed that eNom was "legally required" to block the websites under US law, even though the websites were not hosted in the US, were not targeted at US persons, and were legal under foreign law.

As far as null routing IPs, we'll see.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

We won’t see, it’s never happened and isn’t a requirement in the ban bill.

Read the cited article in Wikipedia. https://web.archive.org/web/20170407043030/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/04bar.html eNom didn’t block DNS users from resolving the domains, they were the registrar for the domains. The domain owners were paying eNom to list their records. As soon as the domain owners moved to a different DNS provider, anyone in the US would be able to access the sites again, even users using eNom public dns servers (if they exist idk).

You didn’t cite a case of the US blocking DNS providers from resolving a domain, you cited a case of the US blocking a registrar from doing business with an entity on a blocklist published by OFAC.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 points 5 months ago

Is it blocked at all? Biden said he wouldn't enforce it yet.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

he wouldn't be able to, anyway.

the deadline is the sunday the 19th. monday the 20th is mlk day (federal holiday, courthouses closed. ag couldn't file proceedings to enforce the legislation) and the last morning of the biden administration. diaperking is then in charge. even though it was his idea to begin with, he's flopped on the issue.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

The US won't block it, but it will be blocked. Tik Tok itself said it will turn off it's servers and block US ips like it did with India.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/17/politics/tiktok-ban-supreme-court/index.html

So it will be tik tok itself enforcing the ban. Which is hilarious. USA showed all this bravado and now has to turn around and beg tik tok to return. I fully expect in the long run tik tok will be sold to Chinese agent Elon Musk and be turned into the spy apparatus US claims it to be. The whole situation shows what a clown USA is.

[-] False@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Why anyone who matters care enough to beg them to come back?

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Don't worry, trump will just cancel that whole shit

[-] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 1 points 5 months ago

Is that a good or bad thing?

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 5 months ago

I feel like it's pretty irrelevant honestly.

Like if my house is burning down I don't care whether I have my blue boxers or my green boxers nor whether China knows.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

When is ticktock... Why is ticktock.. Who is ticktock?

Go to loops! Let's move on: https://loops.video/

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Loops is basically impossible to join though. The email verification takes literal hours, if the email arrives at all.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I tried today and couldn't join.

[-] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

iOS only. Sucks.

[-] Blaze@lemmy.cafe -1 points 5 months ago
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42085 readers
267 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS