124
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

As a major investor into Open AI future, I'd gladly exchange all my non-existing stakes for a blowjob by fugly Sam Altman. It wouldn't turn into any profits, but for some time, he'd have something in his mouth that isn't a lie or a sketchy promo. I believe, some on Open AI board would even pay me to keep him silent.

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Isn't it a private company? They could say it's worth infinity trillion dollars...

[-] addie@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

No, not quite. They're funded by venture capitalists, who put money into investment rounds on the understanding (speculative gamble?) that the company will have a given future value. The last funding round was $6.6bn on the basis that the company will be worth $157bn when it is floated on the stock market. Ed Zitron has quite a good analysis on his page, and also why their business is a complete pile of shite:

https://www.wheresyoured.at/oai-business/

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 month ago

removing the cost of R&D I would assume its profitable right? Once the model is trained running it takes significantly less computing. OpenAI has a fuck ton of customers so I would assume they are making back the cost of running their model API.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

valued at $157 billion

Isn't profitable

Pick one.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Profitable means your revenue is higher than your expenses. Valuation is whatever someone is willing to buy your business for (i.e. what they think the company could earn in the future). They are completely separate concepts, and a highly profitable company could have a low valuation while an unprofitable company can have a high valuation based purely on the future potential of the company.

[-] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Spotify hasn't made a profit at all since its inception afaik.

[-] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

No way with their user base being so massive they are net loss. Can't be true

[-] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Labels take %70 of royalties, leaving Spotify %30. Also they dropped a lot of momey into podcasts. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/spotify-statistics/

[-] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

That is absolutely wild. These really aren't businesses if they aren't profitable and sustainable cash flow wise. When the money dries up your screwed. Hard times define the company not the peaks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

People always act like "how can company A be a thing when it isn't profitable". It isn't about if company A is profitable. It's about whether CEO A is making money. As long as that can happen and, you know, others at the top, company A is right on track.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
124 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

63023 readers
717 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS