141
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 15 points 2 days ago

Bees kill invaders in their nest by climbing all over them and shaking their bodies.

[-] ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

...and boiling them to death with their combined body heat.

[-] ___@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If two moving balls hit each other and bounce apart, it’s the exact same thing as if you held the frame steady on one ball and viewed the other ball as moving faster. Just seems like the stationary ball gets heavier…

Perspective is everything.

[-] lattrommi@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

This link is about the moon but it starts by covering how to view space and orbital objects including simulators which allow one to do what you describe, as well as the ability to move the camera from on ball to the other and many other interesting simulations. https://ciechanow.ski/moon/

[-] Iunnrais@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

Yeah, this one took me a while to wrap my head around and intuitively “get it”. I first learned it was true from that mythbusters episode where they correct their past mistakes… and even they had thought that two cars hitting head on would receive the same energy as hitting a stationary wall at the speed of the sum of their speeds. They were corrected in letters written to them, and then they experimentally verified it.

And even seeing the experimental verification, it still took me a while to really get it. The opposite speeds cancel out, making you go from your speed to zero. Same as if you hit a brick wall at that speed.

Let’s say the two cars are going 50 mph (kph, whatever unit you want). 50-50=0. You experience the same as hitting the brick wall. It’s the difference between initial speed and final speed that matters, not the sum of their speeds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

Mary Queen of Scots was 6ft tall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wreckingball4good@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Rojava exists.

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Consistency of an axiomatic system that contains arithmetic can be proven in this system if and only if it is inconsistent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
141 points (98.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44425 readers
1077 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS