95

It’s been nice to see ordinary Americans open up to life in China but everyone is acting blind to their censorship. Makes me thankful for the fediverse and being able to self host my own instance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

This is it. Self hosting, federation, not for profit is the way. We need an internet that is made by just regular people for no better reason than it's fun. Not just social media either. We need an entire open internet, free and clear of all ulterior motives (or more likely still having bad actors mixed in, but at least they're not pulling any strings at the upper levels).

I don't know how possible that is, but I know we need it.

[-] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 10 points 1 week ago

Fully agree! Thanks for putting my thought into much better words.

The only issue I see now is how to surpass bad mods and admins? The balance between filtering off topic or bad content versus anything goes but then nazis come out seems to be a challenge plus power tripping.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

That's a never-ending process of everyone voting and discussing where the line is and where it should be.

There is no "final" solution, instead the solution is for people to collectively and continiously keep solving it every day.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

I've noticed a very pro-China shift on Lemmy since Trump became president. Yeah, Trump is awful, but it's not like that makes China or Russia better. It makes them all bad.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 18 points 1 week ago

That started well before he became president.

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 week ago

China is good actually.

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 25 points 1 week ago

China is pretty sensitive about depictions of Mao, so it doesn't surprise me.

[-] Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Ironically enough it's actually super popular in China to "Rent-a-Mao" or Chiang Kai-Shek or whoever else from China's modern history. There are a lot of Mao impersonators, just like we have impersonators of Elvis.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

That app doesn't like gambling, politics, or sexually explicit material.

Your post probably fell under politics.

[-] xep@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago

Posting anything about any Chinese leader is verboten.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Loss@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Xiaohongshu bans all politics, even references. There's more serious platforms for those type of people, whereas xiaohongshu is to have fun and connect with others.

[-] bunkyprewster@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I've been in a lot of political discussions on Xiaohongshu. It seems people learn a little Marxism even in high school and are happy to share about it.

Not everything has been super fabulous about China, but nothing critical of Mao, and a big consensus that living in China is kinder to people who aren't wealthy than the US

[-] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 6 days ago

Thanks! Didn’t know that at first

[-] xep@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago

Please name the serious platforms in China that allow the discussion of politics.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

There are some where you're allowed to talk about how great of a job the CCP are doing.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

No different from any Western social media. Try saying something positive about enemies of the empire and find out how long it takes to get some knocks on your door. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/08/28/itys-a28.html

[-] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If that was remotely true half of lemmy would be in gitmo by now.

[-] Loss@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

WeChat, or douyin

[-] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Awwww, you poor thing.

They didn't see you as a useful idiot so they leveraged their hatred for what you are and banished you.

Leopards are hungry on both sides of the line.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
95 points (84.2% liked)

Casual Conversation

1910 readers
211 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS