48

ASHEVILLE, North Carolina, Jan 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday said he would sign an executive order to begin the process of fundamentally overhauling or eliminating the Federal Emergency Management Agency. "FEMA has turned out to be a disaster ... I think we recommend that FEMA go away," he said during a tour of North Carolina to see damage done by Hurricane Helene last year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago

This is gonna go over well next time there's half an inch of snow in Texas and the entire power grid goes down. 😂

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Fun fact, it just snowed in Houston. Surprisingly went okay. Not to defend the Texas power grid. I still had random power outages all year. But it did survive some snow. So that was nice.

[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

They'll just pull themselves up by their... wait

[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“But my egg prices” - morons about to have a very bad 2025 Atlantic hurricane season.

We all warned you this would happen. This move was plainly outlined in Project 2025. Nobody tricked you, you’re just fucking morons.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

B b but Trump claimed he never heard of project 2025. He wouldn't just lie to the American people right?

Accusing gentle Mr. Trump of a misdeed?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

I'm willing to bet that the "problem" with FEMA is that, due to its vital role in dealing with emergencies, it has particularly stringent safeguards in place to prevent it becoming a partisan tool. And since Trump's stated goal is to turn the entirety of the federal government into a partisan tool, it has to go.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe there are some buddies of the trump crime family that would be happy to privatize aid to disaster victims for a nice fee, and trump would like to withhold or bestow aid on States and individual officials that kiss his ass. So you bet the Left Coast won't be getting any, but Mar a Lago will get a new roof every year.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I would bet it was as stupid as someone (or even naturally by group via social media) inventing a narrative during the Biden administration because everything he does is evil. Then the destruction of the agency being the natural conclusion of said narrative. It wins points for Trump since people living in that reality see this as a win over evil.

Then later, when it all blows up, likely during the next hurricane, they can just figure someone else to blame. Everything is probably purely off the cuff.

It's what con men do. Just roll with everything and keep it up for as long as they can. It's worked for Trump his entire life.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Nah, it's just really hard to steal from it without people noticing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I think if he denies a state assistance because they won't play his games, other countries step in and send all the assistance that state could want. Imagine if China just threw billions of dollars at LA without conditions to make a point. I don't expect Xi to be that smart, but it would be funny as hell watching Trump scramble.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Xi and Trump seem to coordinate pretty closely. If Trump weakened US cohesiveness and Xi stepped in, Trump would thank him and kiss his ass.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They say they have a plan to give money directly to the states instead. So far nobody has seen or heard this plan.

Even if such a plan exists, that still sounds like they're taking a stockpile of vehicles and personnel and getting rid of it all only to be unprepared for all future disasters.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The plan is to give money to states that kiss trump’s ass, and none for the blue states or cities that don’t.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Fuck it. Bye Texas. Bye Florida. You will not be missed.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

I'll miss me, but also not really. I've already accepted that I'm probably gonna die before Trump is out of office—I don't know if it's better to go out in a concentration camp or some unmanaged aftermath of a natural disaster.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Take some fascists with you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Every accusation is a project. They will turn FEMA into what they've been accusing FEMA of.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago
[-] DesertHermit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This 1million%

Also grew up being promised that any day now, 1) Bill Clinton will take all the guns, and 2) We'll go to FEMA camps to get gassed. It was all part of the UN Agenda 21 thing that George HW Bush/Clintons/Soros/CNN/Bill Gates and the New World Order One-World-Government are bringing.

Except none of that ever happened. Hm....were those guests on Art Bell in 1998 possibly....wrong?

And yet, 30 years later, here we are.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://www.axios.com/2024/10/08/fema-direct-payments-state-recipients

Where FEMA's direct relief money is going

Florida, Louisiana and Texas residents have received the lion's share of FEMA direct assistance since 2015, per newly gathered data.

Texas and Louisiana have been Republican-favoring states for some time.

https://www.270towin.com/states/Louisiana

https://www.270towin.com/states/Texas

Florida is more swing, though has been trending Republican:

https://www.270towin.com/states/Florida

I'd guess -- not familiar with the politics -- that maybe there's irritation with FEMA's speed of processing hurricane aid in those states, and that's what's driving Trump's statements. However, if FEMA simply disappeared tomorrow, along with the aid it provided, it'd probably be generally-disadvantageous to Republican-favoring states.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nah, "get rid of FEMA" has been a thing for a long while, since before 2000. The issue is FEMA looks like a giant black box that does nothing but suck money when they aren't being actively used, at least to the layperson, and when they ARE engaged with a disaster, people don't get that it's almost always local aid networks and such that actually handle distributing things because they know their town and the people who need help better than FEMA does, so they still look like all they're doing is dumping truckloads of supplies off in the middle of the area. They also buy scary things like body bags (because natural disasters tend to wind up with a lot of dead bodies), making dumb people think they have some ulterior, sinister motives (see X-Files).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Probably priorities. Probably the exact opposite of what they claim.

Don’t forget the part where Trump said he didn’t see the point in having federal emergency response people ready to rush in and help. People who would evaluate need and get help where it’s most important …. Instead of what Trump co siders mpst important.

I call uno reverse on these claims that fema only helps the wealthy rather than those who need it most. That is what is not happening, yet. That is what will be happening

[-] Zier@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

Just like the covid crisis (it's a hoax) where he said it would 'disappear', President Felon & his cult will leave us all to die without any help or caring from our government, that we fund !

[-] Infinite@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Funds for me, not for thee.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The replacement will have jump shot training sessions with paper towels.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The south hurt itself in its confusion.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I think you misunderstand his goal here. This won't stop him from giving aid to the people/states who help him. This will only stop FEMA helping everyone unconditionally. He isn't trying to stop aid. He's trying to stop aid without strings attached. This is a power play.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Plus read about how he specifically didn’t want emergency response people ready to jump in and help, just money. Money to be allocated on personal choice, not need, to the governor. Money for the governor to allocate by personal choice, not need, to communities and companies. This is about buying favors all the way down.

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

States would need to create an emergency bureaucracy redundant to each other state. California or Texas could do it but good luck South Dakota.

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

Trump: fuck the poor, they're on their own.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

All those hurricane victims that complained about "illegals" getting some FEMA (but it wasn't FEMA money, not that they cared) money got their wish. They won't get any more FEMA money. Maybe nobody else will, either.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Florida's about to be unaffordable for millions of Americans. FEMA's NFIP program had been disproportionately keeping cost of flood insurance low for millions of people in hurricane/flood regions along the Gulf coast, but now the market alone will dictate rates if FEMA is taken out of the picture.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

So trump thinks that a president is king and that royal decrees (executive orders) can just do whatever the hell he wants, bypassing senate and all, ignoring existing law

It's not how that works, it's not how anything works, but for some weird reason the Senate just goes with it and for existing law, well, so far judges are striking down all his shit but something tells me that the supre court will just say with the first trial that cheeto is always right and that will be it.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It's very demonstrably how that works in the context of recent US history. It shouldn't, but it does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

He's going to form the department of paper towel throwing

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
48 points (98.0% liked)

News

24342 readers
796 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS