118
submitted 1 week ago by TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee to c/movies@lemm.ee
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Don't worry, once he's dead and can't stop it Hollywood will thoroughly sh*t over this IP as well with prequels, sequels and spinoffs. They're very patient if there's potential for a cash grab.

Then again, Spielberg isn't so pure -- he CGI'd the guns with walkie-talkies in the re-release didn't he? Can't depict our loving government agents as anything but benevolent, right?

Wasn't it Terry Pr⍺tchett who specifically put in his will that all of his unfinished works (on hard drives) were to be crushed with a steamroller?

Ah yes

[-] Alice@beehaw.org 10 points 1 week ago

Wasn't it Terry Pr⍺tchett who specifically put in his will that all of his unfinished works (on hard drives) were to be crushed with a steamroller?

People were so upset about that and I understand why, but creators are so dehumanized and treated as entertainment machines, I think being able to release or withhold your work on your own terms is so important.

I still feel really weird knowing that Kafka's writings were released against his wishes after he died. I can't even say it wasn't a net positive, and I know he's long dead so it doesn't really affect him, but it feels like people don't want artists or writers to be able to keep anything to themselves. We're not only entitled to everything they've already made, but everything they could potentially make. How many times have you heard people say "we were robbed" because a standalone work didn't get a sequel, or a TV show didn't get a dozen redundant seasons? Like if we like someone's work, we're owed more of it.

[-] Maultasche@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

His daughter did publish The Shepherd's Crown after his death, but that one was almost completely finished and works great as a finale to the series.

[-] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago

Spielberg later regretted making those changes to ET saying,

"That was a mistake," Spielberg told a master class at the Time 100 Summit in New York City.

"I never should have done that.

"E.T. is a product of its era. No film should be revised based on the lenses we now are, either voluntarily, or being forced to peer through.

Also, in another example, Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale have the rights to Back to the Future. Universal need there approval for any sequels/remakes which they will strongly refuse. They've also left the legal rights to their estates. So even once they've passed on, the chance of anymore films are basically zero.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

The Universal Studios E.T. ride is supposed to be based on the script for E.T. 2. Its basically an acid trip.

[-] arc@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

It's definitely weird all right. Starts off like you're riding Elliot's bike into the sky and ends up like some hallucinatory trip to ET's home world which is all neon and tie dye with bad animatronics, talking mushrooms and other weirdness.

Despite being trippy it's actually a very nice ride to go on because the lines tend to be short and it's blessedly well airconditioned with the line mimicking standing in a pine forest at night. I can't see the Florida ride lasting much longer because it must be over 30 years old by this point. I think it's only gone that long because that section of the park has been relatively static in terms of development.

[-] skribe@aussie.zone 16 points 1 week ago
[-] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

In modern times they for sure would have called them ETwo and EThree - Part 1 and EThree - Part 2: Endgame.

In the 90s it would have been E2T and a huge ship of ETs would have blown up New York with a big laser because they wanted revenge for kidnapping the OG ET.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There was a sequel though!

ET, the book of the green planet.

It was a bit weird, shifting into ET's perspective as the main character, but it is a delightful read despite that.

Edit: he mentions it in the article, and I think his opinion that it was a better book than it could ever be as a movie is dead on.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Jo Miran below mentioned this, but they took elements from the book/potential sequel when making the ET ride at Universal.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

That's cool as hell :)

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

And don't forget his species is in the star wars universe. So I'd expect a Jedi E.T.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
118 points (98.4% liked)

movies

2268 readers
172 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS