237
submitted 10 months ago by RotatingParts@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 60 points 10 months ago

How opt-out will work in practice:

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 40 points 10 months ago

Not sure if this was on purpose, but it seemed quite appropriate

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 24 points 10 months ago

It's Lisa looking at a sign that reads:

"Keep Out"

"Or Enter. I'm a sign, not a cop."

[-] barryamelton@lemmy.ml 55 points 10 months ago

Copyright and license laws for you, not for me. This is the biggest theft ever.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

Intellectual property are rights for the rich. A perversion of science and art used to commercialize our culture. Creating artificial scarcity while denying that all science and art are built from copying and iterative development.

We could abolish it completely and it would cause an explosion of creativity and innovation like we have never seen before.

[-] skribe@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, nah. While copyrights are a problem as they're currently employed, removing them would screw every content creator on the planet. Most of us don't make much as it is, with only a few making a living from our work. Removing copyright would allow anyone to take what we produce without any compensation.

The corporations would love that.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Content creators are not protected by copyright unless they have anywhere between $50k-300k and months of their time to waste an litigation.

The average cost for a federal copyright case is $278,000. Let's stop pretending this is for the little guy.

Most importantly you are only looking at the utility of Intellectual property to make money. Art and science exist outside this realm for thousands of years without it.

We are to sacrifice the way science and art have always worked so supposedly content creators can make money. If this is your argument I will have to take a hard pass.

[-] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 10 months ago

In theory, the law applies to everyone. In practice, it doesn't apply to rich entities.

[-] Wolfie@lemm.ee 35 points 10 months ago

I'm not from England, but damm this is absolutely terrible. England already has a LOT of cameras everywhere to track people. They work hard to try and track people everywhere. Hence why this is scary cause this might actually go through due to how anti-privacy they seem to be.

[-] dicksteele@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

They do track a lot, for no real good reason either. Most of the cctv systems you see are blurry, especially at distance, storage of high quality video takes a lot of space and money I guess. It’s a crime deterrent at best but lately most criminals don’t really give a damn, you see wannabe gangsters riding around on bicycles or scooters with balaclavas on, so the real criminals can blend right in with the wannabes. Police presence only seems to exist when football is being played also. This joke of a country could do with a reset button, probably been that way for a long time.

[-] gwysibo@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago

Police presence only seems to exist when football is being played also.

Don't forget about environmental protests!

[-] far_university190@feddit.org 1 points 10 months ago

reset button

Best can do drop the sun into parliament.

[-] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

I support this if it applies to everyone, not just AI. We should be able to use everything that we see as well

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 10 months ago

Open source the planet.

[-] HotCoffee@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago

Uk really is one of the worst countries with regards to privacy. Always trying to pass some shit that enables them to spy on you. Last year they wanted backdoors in all messengers, now this.

[-] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 0 points 10 months ago

Well, not worse, than eu.

[-] barryamelton@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 months ago

How do you opt out for already created content in the past?

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 12 points 10 months ago

I'm fully down with this as long as any model that is trained on publicly accessible data follows these rules:

  1. All media that is imported his cataloged, I want to know what's in the model

  2. The weights are open

  3. The model is made publicly available.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

I am all for publicly available models.

[-] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 9 points 10 months ago

Not interested enough to support corpo media please post it on peertube if you can. but from the headline: yikes! And I thought they were done with the most vile political idiocy.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

If any rando can see it, the robot can see it.

[-] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago
[-] bigFab@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago
[-] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

it was in the same sublemmy if i can remember, around early december

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
237 points (98.8% liked)

Privacy

43392 readers
240 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS