to ensure that the technology is "safe, secure and trustworthy."
None of the really iconic AIs are safe, secure or trustworthy.
What's the ball and the last one from?
From top-to-bottom:
Skynet from The Terminator
Joshua from WarGames
Yup, that's what i missed. Thanks!
Coulda added a picture of the facebook guy and no one would have noticed
UK still pretending to be a global power I see.
All regulation of new technology is pointless because the law is written by people who don't understand it. And by "new technology" I mean anything invented after the year 1900
wouldn't make much sense to sign an agreement you are already in violation of.
Why did the UK refuse?
In a brief statement, the UK government said it had not been able to add its name to it because of concerns about national security and "global governance."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8edn0n58gwo
No idea if thats a real reason or not.
Sounds like "we need to have guns if they have guns." Might be right in the short term, but at what future cost?
Starmer would be better off doing exactly the opposite of everything Trump does.
Dunno about the UK, but the US is going guns blazing towards Robocops.
Ironically, police probably think they'll be in charge of the robots, rather than the robots replacing them.
Between this and the asteroid scheduled to (maybe) hit Earth in 2032, I'm beginning to think that we're in for a rough time.
Ai regulation is a joke because the tech evolves faster than legislation. Esp when you have open source LLMs out there. Not to mention Meta pirating Terrabytes of textbooks to train their models
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
