133

Chandrayaan-3: India's historic Moon mission lifts off successfully (www.bbc.com)

submitted 1 year ago by reclipse@lemdro.id to c/world@lemmy.world

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] fearout@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Congrats to India! Glad to see more space programs succeed.

[+] dudebro@lemmy.world -27 points 1 year ago

I'm not. Seems like a waste of money when their children are starving.

[-] fearout@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

"Let's stop all progress until we deal with insert_your_problem_of_choice" has never been a good take, it stifles development without actually helping. In an ideal world that might work, but as is it just doesn't.

To add to that, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt that starving children in India is actually a mere money problem. It looks more like a wealth distribution problem, and that one doesn't get fixed by stopping space programs.

[-] BackwoodsBeatnik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You basically said what I was going to, but the ideal world part I disagree with.

A world in which enough is grown to feed everyone and enough profit is produced to meet everyone’s needs doesn’t need to be ideal. It’s a world we live in now.

The above dude should just stick to attacking the ultra wealthy and like you said, not space programs.

But like I was saying, an ideal world isn’t needed. Just about 30% of the rest of us to physically and verbally confront the few thousand or so who take too much.

[-] fearout@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Ok, ideal is probably the wrong word here. What I meant is a world where narrowly focused efforts are actually fast and effective, it might be a good idea to heavily prioritise some stuff to deal with pressing misery-inducing issues faster. But as we currently are, that concept just isn't rooted in reality.

[-] BackwoodsBeatnik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I see what you’re saying, and please don’t think I was attacking you, rather adding to your point.

I think a world you described is one where that 30% I mentioned were way more engaged politically globally.

As it not being rooted in reality that’s the ceiling I want to break. 1 million people in a country making direct, unified actions, unified by class could achieve many of those fast and effective efforts.

I feel you though, I feel that we are moving at a fraction of the speed we ought to be and could be going towards progress and it’s almost maddening not seemingly being able to do anything except know how fucked it all is.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

“Let’s stop all progress until we deal with insert_your_problem_of_choice” has never been a good take

I mean, sure, most of the time.

But when one is "a shit ton of kids is starving" and the other is "vanity moon mission we don't gain knowledge from"...

Yeah, maybe address the starving kids first.

but I doubt that starving children in India is actually a mere money problem. It looks more like a wealth distribution problem, and that one doesn’t get fixed by stopping space programs.

India flat out said the reason for this program is for PR...

It's not science, it's not innovation, or the pursuit of knowledge.

The reason they've spent decades and billions on this, is to try and seem like India is a 1st world country.

That could also be accomplished by not having one of the world's highest rates of childhood starvation and malnourishment.

Instead they ignore that for "flashier" methods.

[-] reclipse@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

India flat out said the reason for this program is for PR...

It's not science, it's not innovation, or the pursuit of knowledge.

What's your source on this?

[-] dhruv@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You know what I think the root cause of any money problem in India is? Corruption. It's corrupt from the very top. It's not exactly easy to fix it with a population that large either. It's a mess and that's why it's a third world country.

Edit: That's one of the reasons it's a third world country. I'm just highlighting what I find wrong.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Lol, what? Where did you get the word 'progress' from? Seems like a loaded argument.

Try to be more direct and don't put words in my mouth. Argue with what I'm saying, not with what sounds nice in your head.

[-] fearout@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

In that case you should formulate your thoughts more clearly. Right now it reads as exactly that — "stop wasting money on progressing in this field because look at this_problem". So, what did you actually mean by your comment then?

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"This" problem won't be solved if we keep passing a bunch of money around at the top.

Like I said before, it's a pretty simple concept if you put forth even the slightest amount of effort into understand it.

At this point, if you don't get it then that's on you.

Let's be real though: you're just flustered because you think the disparity in wealth should grow instead of shrink. Just admit it, bro. Then we can all move on with our lives.

[-] fearout@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Also, I think that the wealth disparity should decrease as much as possible, and the fact that that's what you got from my comments is just weird.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

I'm glad you're willing to say it. Most people are afraid to.

[-] fearout@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Have you misread my comment or have we been visiting completely different internets? Most of the people who are against wealth inequality are happy to point that out.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

No, most of the people I come across are tribalistic to their core.

Since neither tribe is saying, in clear and concise terms, "the disparity in wealth should shrink instead of grow," a lot of people lose sight of what's really going on.

I like to spell it out for them leaving no room for ambiguity. Those who are afraid to answer the question are only like that because they're ashamed of their answer.

[-] fearout@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, so googling it now, it seems like Indian space program has a budget of about $1,5 mln (holy shit they launched using that? I'm doubly impressed). I'm pretty sure that's just the cost of some couch in the Antilia building.

So I still fail to see your point. This is nothing compared to country's budget, not even a rounding error.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Tell that to the starving children it's 'nothing.'

[-] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

ISROʼs last lunar exploration mission was in 2019 and called Chandrayaan-2. The lunar orbiter succeeded. The lunar lander, named Vikram, failed, crashing onto the lunar surface. Vikram contained a lunar rover named Pragyan.

Here is Scott Manleyʼs review of the Vikram failure.

Here is a New York Times gift article link about today's (2023-07-14) launch.

Here are animations of the planned orbits (Videos (1,2) by Phoenix777 / 🅭🅯🄎 4.0):

spoiler

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=5xKJG00-S_c

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] newguy208@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Back in Reddit, you couldn't have a single post about India's space works without the mods locking the threads. I had hoped those fuckers would stay there.

[-] reclipse@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

Fuckers are here now.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023

133 points (95.9% liked)

World News

39005 readers

974 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.