341
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 8 points 8 hours ago

There's also upsides to Luigi

[-] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 2 points 6 hours ago
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 hours ago

Seven of 45 Democrats - and at the beginning of February before the strength of constituent anger had really sunk in for elected officials.

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

The upsides are that he’ll die with us.

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 21 hours ago

Why does it surprise you that democrats are voting for Trump picks? The democrats are barely to the left of republicans. You people need to stop seeing them as an opposition party, because they've literally come out and said they don't want to be that.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

You people need to stop seeing them as an opposition party, because they’ve literally come out and said they don’t want to be that.

Democrats in 2024: "We are the last defense you have against totalitarian fascism! We are the thin line between democracy and dictatorship! You want us on that wall! You need us on that wall!"

American voters: "After all the gerrymandering and disenfranchisement and other dirty tricks, we only gave the Republicans a three vote margin in the House and the Senate. See what you can do with that."

Democrats in 2025: "Rubber stamping everything the GOP throws across our desk. Resistance is futile. The best thing we can do is see how much money we can bilk from donors before 2026."

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

we only gave the Republicans a three vote margin in the House and the Senate

Many USA states have the vote counting operated by oligarchs with no oversight, using tools that have no transparency or double checking, and the results fail exit polls.

This has been talked about for decades except not by the liberals in the USA. The Democratic Party has sidelined paper ballot progress, stomping down on criticisms of unfair ballot counts, while losing influence in large areas due to ballot manipulation.

The result after 30 years of this is that most American liberals scoff at human witnessed ballot counting, resist talking about it, and have no clue .

Nobody competent can cite voting results across all 50 states without using air quotes or cracking a joke

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Well, look at what happens even in liberal hotbeds like NYC and San Fransisco. Democrats are so obsessed with appeasing wealthy reactionaries that they'll do obnoxiously anti-popular moves like Hochul delaying congestion pricing (what a turn of face that's been) and Dianne Feinstein raising a Confederate Flag above the mayor's office.

How else do you get a crook like Eric Adams or Henry Cuellar or Bob Menendez in these positions of entrenched power without the party endlessly running cover for them. Fucking sickening.

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

No real leaders to rally about, anywhere, that I know about. Just a slow decline into increased corruption

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 21 hours ago

Kinda sorta. It took about two weeks of constituent pressure to get the Democrats to start behaving like an opposition party. So the early nominees got a lot of Democrats voting for them.

So there were a lot of votes like this in the first week of February. At this point, the only Senate Democrat pulling this kind of stunt is Fetterman

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 16 hours ago

Oh I'm sure the rich will be just fine. The rest of us are replaceable ☺️

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

The richest man in Rome lived miserably compared to the average retired Wisconsin suburbanite.

How long that lasts remains to be seen. What makes living in this country luxurious is the enormous development of industrial infrastructure and professional services. Gut Medicare, knock out air traffick control, and allow bird flu to decimate the agricultural sector. In time, the nicest thing a dollar will buy you is a ticket abroad.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

The richest man in Rome lived miserably compared to the average retired Wisconsin suburbanite.

Based on what exactly? The richest man in Rome would have had an abundance of slave labour available.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 7 hours ago

They've elevated themselves as high as it is possible to go, so the only way for them to get higher is by lowering us.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I gotta disagree. Look abroad and you'll find other countries that are achieving much higher standards of living than the US. East Asia state, in particularly, have outpaced us in terms of health care, transportation, and education. But Mexico is closing in quick and accelerating. The BRICS, particularly South Africa, India, and Brazil, have these rapidly advancing metro-poles. We're on the tipping point for advanced nuclear power thanks to public investment from France to China. Things can absolutely get a whole lot better.

And even within the US, we're seeing wealthier corners of the country (your NYCs and Seattles and Lexingtons and Bostons and Salt Lake Cities) secure a kind of high quality modern lifestyle that is totally foreign to folks trapped in Birmingham, ALs or Dayton, OHs. When corners of Oklahoma can't afford a full five day school week and neighborhoods in Louisiana are losing consistent access to electricity and potable water.

And without steady investment in infrastructure and well-managed natural resources, the things that make a place like Dubai or Vegas seem luxurious all go away. The Bellagio doesn't work if the Hoover Dam runs dry.

[-] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Before your replacement a quick question, how well do you think you would blend down into SoylentX?

Asking for the regional Dark MAGA officer.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The rich will be dead. Their security teams will be just fine.

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 day ago

There are upsides.... humanity kills themselves and earth will recover eventually.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

humanity kills themselves

Pockets of humanity will endure this at least as well as they endured the Ice Age or the Toba Explosion. But there's around 8 billion of us bouncing around today. The transition down to something like even just 1 billion would be nightmarish to live through.

This isn't a question of humanity hitting the "off" switch nearly so much as it is asking ourselves how we want our grandchildren to live a century from now.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago

Or to our wealthy overlords ... it will kill off the "surplus population" and leave more room and resources for them.

[-] Alue42@fedia.io 9 points 21 hours ago

The wealthy overlords require a multitude of cheap labor to retain their wealth. That's why they are so concerned about falling birth rates - listen to any of them talk about it, it has nothing to do with concern for the planet like any of the rest of us (less demand on resources that we are already depleting, etc), they are concerned about maintaining the current rates of production and labor if the next generations are smaller and smaller. Sure, Vance is talking about it from a "family values" perspective, because that's a cloak he thinks his base will listen to, but listen to Musk talk about it, or any of the "pro-natalist" movement.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

That's the funniest thing. The wealthy have bunkers and all that but don't have the skills to actually survive.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 points 23 hours ago

Best part is those bunkers will be filled a handful of physically weak billionaires and money makers surrounded and outnumbered by well trained soldiers, mercenaries and military people. The wealthy owners believe that they hired honourable, loyal dedicated soldiers ... but once the lights go out and everyone is on their own, who do you think will want to take over those bunkers?

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 7 points 21 hours ago

That's why the billionaires want shock collars on their security squads.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

As if ex-special forces don't get anti-interrogation training, oh and lock picking training.

They really are just a bunch of greedy idiots.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

Also the collars aren't immune to simple brute force attacks. A careful angle grinder can nullify it. Do that to the entire security team and now there's a new warlord in town.

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Makes a lot of sense Muskrat is pouring money into the neurolink.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

But there will be fewer of us to collect, process, and deliver those resources. This means that those of us who are left will be able to command higher wages and better working conditions. (Not high or better enough, mind you, but higher and better.)

[-] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago

Ask the Irish about that.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

That's why they're investing heavily in AI

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Which is what our class wars will be based on .... which group should be left or eliminated in order to serve the masters because one group has to go.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I mean maybe, that's a long shot. I also don't think its worth killing everything currently on the planet that didn't have a choice in the matter.

[-] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 21 hours ago

In a very important way: they're afraid of constituent anger. Unlike a couple weeks back, they're now consistent about voting against Trump nominees.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Every US citizen needs to grab the free app 5 Calls. It will remind you weekly to call your representatives and senators. It provides you with a short script that you can use to express your displeasure, about an absolute myriad of issues. It also hands you the appropriate senators and representatives that are going to listen to you, because you are one of their constituents, and they can actually do something about it.

I've been doing it for three weeks now, and clearly it's barely working. If they wanted an engaged and enraged constituency, they may just get it.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago

Democrats are in it with Republicans

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago

A few Democrats are. Most are not.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Upsides like what? Like after the Anthropocene there will be fewer dumbasses in the world?

[-] Cargon@lemmy.ml 6 points 22 hours ago

At this rate the Antropocene is gonna be so short that it shouldn't even be a 'cene.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Its the big reset. All those who voted Republican just waiting to be able to afford a house...meanwhile getting layer off. They don't realize that if there are 5 people an 4 houses then 1 goes without a house no matter what. The solution is not to burn down the other 4 houses or to layoff the other 4 people so they call all fight to stay in their home. The solution is to build more homes! Plain and simple. And migrants can help!

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 18 hours ago

There are currently more empty homes in the US than there are homeless people. There are roughly 30 empty units for each homeless person.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Let's see this alternative knowledge be handled by chief turd and his Nazi committee.

[-] tehWrapper@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

You will have cheap power to stay inside your AC controlled home, but won't be able to go outside.

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

Air conditioning our crops to allow them to have a chance to survive will definitely lower grocery prices.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

“cheap”

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
341 points (98.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5792 readers
1095 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS