1

**The EU is seeking improved screening of greenfield projects and a bigger say on which investments member states approve on national security grounds, as it expands its efforts to protect critical assets and know-how amid rising geopolitical tensions involving countries such as China. **

...

“What comes out throughout [the reforms] is the Commission trying to give itself a … greater role in foreign investment screening,” says Christoph Barth, a partner in law firm Linklaters’s antitrust and foreign investment practice.

Among the proposed changes to the inbound screening regulation, which must be approved by European parliament and council to take effect, is obliging member states to give ‘utmost consideration’ to the Commission’s input when assessing a transaction’s national security risks and an explanation when their views diverge. “The question is whether the Commission now makes its opinions more directive in the sense of achieving a particular outcome for a particular case,” says Mr Barth, adding that this could “result in a potential clash between the Commission and member states”.

...

“The push toward a FDI screening of greenfield investments is likely to build another hurdle for investments in the energy, battery or e-car sector … sectors where foreign competitors of EU companies have been gaining significant market share,” said Udo Herbert Olgemöller, partner at Allen & Overy. “Such screenings are time-consuming and create a certain level of legal uncertainty as their outcome may be affected by political considerations that are hardly predictable.”

...

The Commission has also progressed plans to screen outbound investments into critical technologies in countries such as China, where it fears sensitive technologies and know-how could be used to undermine national security. It is seeking industry feedback via a three-month public consultation, which will be followed by a year of monitoring outbound deals and a final decision on an outbound mechanism by August 2025.

One of the early questions is whether the challenging task of obtaining the buy-in of each member state, which is necessary to introduce an outbound mechanism, can be achieved. On January 17, the European parliament passed a resolution calling for the expansion of legislative initiatives to tackle risks emanating from Chinese investment in the bloc. But neither industrial policies nor views on China are fully aligned across EU countries.

...

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

2447 readers
11 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS