Mark Kelly is the name missing from the headline
Yeah how the fuck do they exclude, "NASA Astronaut, combat pilot, and current US Arizona Democratic Senator..."
The fact that I knew it would be Mark Kelly is speaking volumes about the integrity (or lack thereof) of most astronauts :(
I agree with him, musk should climb into a rocket and be blasted into space (preferably towards the sun).
Nah, too much fuel needed to get to the sun. Launching straight up and back down is fine. More akin to a missile, but with Elon on the tip as opposed to a warhead of any kind.
With our luck, he’d probably create some sort of weird, cataclysmic thingy.
On the other hand making him go extrasolar might piss off the aliens… I mean, we shouldn’t just dump our space trash, right?
At this point I'd welcome our alien overlords.
I'm sure after they digest some of the garbage that spills from Musk they'll show some leniency. Or it will piss them off more that we didn't "handle" the problem sooner. Either way I'm sure it will be fine.
I know we aren't lucky enough for this to happen, but I would really savor watching Musk go the way of the OceanGate douchebag.
If he launched into space and accidentally crashed into his own orbiting Tesla, it would go a long way towards balancing the karmic scales.
Lol this is just like a repeat of those thai kids trapped in the cave...
Treat him the way Buzz would.
Let's not idolize Buzz. He's an overreactive fucktard who endorsed Trump this election. The worst of all the Apollo 11 crew. Michael Collins was way cooler.
That's all well and good. Musk still needs to get punched in the face.
Fair enough.
Michael Collins supposedly said that had Neil and Buzz not survived landing or returning that he wasn’t going to come back either. Dude was made of something sorely missing in this world.
If not for all of the ozempic and other drug cocktails, Musk would have made a great shield for reentry.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News