54
submitted 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) by solo@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Companies can sue governments for closing oilfields and mines – and the risk of huge damages is already stopping countries from passing green laws, ministers say


Edit: I just found a totally relevant article and thought of adding it here, instead of making a new post.

how Wall Street is making millions betting against green laws

Now, however, the sector has found a far larger playground: financing massive arbitration lawsuits launched by companies against governments, where claims can stretch to tens of billions of dollars.

These cases come under a little-known area of international law called investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), which allows corporations to sue countries for actions that hurt their profits.

With litigation funders facing no risk of a counterclaim, and potential awards that now average more than $200m (£160m), legal experts warn that the system has become a “gambler’s nirvana” for hedge funds and specialist financiers.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Nooo we can't close the oil fields, the oil oligarchs will get mad!!!

Fuck off and grow a backbone. Develop policy where the companies can't sue the government and the government can cancel the deal or alter regulations as needed. If oil is truly that profitable, its worth the risk.

In my province, the premier was able to prevent any lawsuit coming their way from injured cyclists after banning and removing bike lanes. Why do we let rich corporations walk all over us while only showing a backbone to our own populations? Allowing this to continue sets a dangerous precedent that laws and regulations only apply to those who can't afford to sue against them.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 hours ago

The simple solution is to either rewrite or leave those treaties. In fact that is already happening.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 7 hours ago

Fuck off and grow a backbone. Develop policy where the companies can't sue the government and the government can cancel the deal or alter regulations as needed.

The thing that bugs me is that politicians thread the needle all the freaking time. They're skilled at moving policy towards a goal (usually for ill), so the idea that "they're just hamstrung and can't even look at oil companies funny" is simply ridiculous.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 8 hours ago

Then change the fucking laws. You run the damn country, do your damn job.

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

"You control the buttons you press"

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Ok lets see here, one one hand lots of lawsuits....ok yeah that's bad. On the other side..... everyone dies oh geez ok lawsuits it is then.

...no wait I missed this small print... everyone dies, but maybe not for a while. Oh right, let's go with that then!

[-] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Thanks. I wasn't aware of the specific mechanism in our trade agreements. No government should be compromising their right to make public policy.

this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5919 readers
1094 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS