151
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned Donald Trump and Elon Musk at a packed Arizona rally, accusing them of harming working-class Americans and promoting oligarchy.

Sanders denounced corporate CEOs as “major criminals” exploiting workers, while Ocasio-Cortez called for stronger Democratic leadership.

Rallygoers urged Ocasio-Cortez to challenge Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer after he supported a Republican funding bill.

The rally, part of Sanders' “Stop Oligarchy” tour, follows criticism of the Democratic Party’s weak response to Trump’s agenda and features further events in Colorado and Arizona.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

I really hope this "AOC takes over the Democratic Party and saves America" arc has a happy ending

[-] shawn1122@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

She's a young, outspoken woman of color. Old white people would never let it happen, even if half are in a nursing home mainlining Fox News straight into their frontal cortex and can barely walk on their own.

A lot of folk are still recovering from Obama being elected twice.

At least Bernie looks familiar to them, so the hatred will be tampered.

[-] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Actually the groups that swung the election for Trump were young men (HUGE swing), and immigrants (despite voting against their own interests and pulling the ladder up behind them for future immigration).

Senior men were more likely to vote for Kamala than young men.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

We gotta figure out how to De-Tate people

[-] shawn1122@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Immigrants did still vote for Kamala as a majority (55%).

I wasn't aware of the massive jump Trump had achieved with young men. Looks like it was especially true with young white men, with nearly two thirds voting for Trump. Less than 30% of young men from other racial demographics voted for Trump with the exception of Latinos (45%).

Overall the biggest jumps were with Latinos and young white men but he saw an increase in nearly of every demographic except older white people with whom he has historically had majority support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I unfortunately have to agree with you. With how the Harris election results went, i don't think people are ready for a woman president, let alone a brown one. The median American is too stupid, racist, and sexist.

[-] cooperativesrock@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

I think this is not the right conclusion to draw from Harris and Clinton lost to Trump. They were both right-center Dems with lots of anti-left positions. Clinton voted to attack Iraq even though we all knew there were no WMDs and had been a polarizing figure for decades, she was not a good candidate. Neither was Harris, she was corporate, didn't condemn the genocide in Israel, and courted the Cheney vote. That isn't how to get the left to turn out. Neither had a good platform. Mitt Romney lost and so did John McCain and John Kerry I don't hear anyone condemning Mormons or veterans being losing classes of candidates.

A principled woman who isn't a corporate shill or pro-genocide is completely different. Our system is broken, pretending a little adjusting of the regulations or pretending the other side is acting in good faith and being gracious is clearly a losing strategy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The powers and process screwed over Bernie in 2016. It would have unquestionably been a clear victory over orange circus clown. He would have been one of the greatest leaders in the 21st century. Now he's too old, even though the fire is still in him. But we do know now that America hates women, especially of colour, for leaders. AOC wouldn't have a chance until a huge social upheaval to change such attitudes and core hatred has occurred, possibly the Civil War 2/WW3.

Just like how past world wars created the world we live in today. Before WW1, before men of all social classes bled together in the trenches of Europe it was quite a different attitude regarding the rights of people and classes compared to after the event. The schools of fascism and communism was very enticing to populations after such a wanton and colossal loss of life by poor leadership on the battlefields.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Clinton and Harris didn't lose because they were women. They lost because their campaigns were broken.

Harris was sabotaged by Biden trying to cling to power despite not being fit for the job anymore and Clinton thought she had such a guaranteed win she didn't even bother to try to counter her image as the career politician that was everything wrong with government at the time. They would have both still lost even if they were old rich white men.

And, before you say it, Biden only won because of the pandemic. If people hadn't been dying in droves at the time, we would have already finished with Trump's second term by now.

[-] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

I was there. It was awesome seeing so many people. I prefer Mutualism over Democratic Socialism, but like AOC said there, "no matter if you disagree with me on a few things, if you are willing to fight for someone you don’t know, you are welcome here."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Abstracted@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

I wish you Americans would deal with this crap before I end up getting drafted to defend my country from the orange porcine dementia patient.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

Seriously. One of the most conservative old guys at my running club yesterday said, and I quote, “someone needs to kill Donald Trump and Elon Musk.” And I live in Alberta.

We are absolutely done with the US’s bullshit up here guys. Fucking do something. If one more of you cowards tries to tell me you’re going to vote harder in the primaries or some other stupid limp dick excuse, I swear to god man. Our lives and sovereignty are being threatened here. For the love of god do something actually useful for once in your lives.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] tingly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

What do you suggest Americans do? Say someone is a working class American who didn’t vote for Trump. They can barely make ends meet and have no power or political sway. What does that person do? I’m not trying to be funny, I’m simply interested in your take and perspective as a non-American.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

I saw something recently that was talking about how individualism has led us to this situation. Everyone is thinking what they can do. We lost our collectivist spirit. We don't think about what we can do.

An individual has essentially no power. A group does. We need to get better at organizing. This is made hard because we are so separated from each other, driving individually to work, then back home, largely to houses where you don't interact with anyone else. We have basically no third places anymore where you'd typically organize. This situation was designed, and it's going to be hard to get out of, but we need to get better at forming groups and organizing.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This situation was designed, and it’s going to be hard to get out of, but we need to get better at forming groups and organizing.

Nothing can be fixed until it's understood to be a problem, and AOC from her stump speeches and emails seems to at least recognize the problem you're pointing that American systems are essentially "massively scaled up isolation from others".

Rugged individualism has failed us. It's going to take a reclamation of collectivism to fix our problems.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And while we’re at it, why don’t people in China have the freedom to speak out against their government and not have censorship? Maybe if they all just got together in a big public square and really protested, I bet that would end really well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Warehouse@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

What do you suggest Americans do?

You'd know more than someone outside of the US.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] zane@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago

Face it. Your blaming dirt farming peasants that John the bastard is going to crusade your lands.

There's literally nothing we can do about it besides die as well in most cases.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Iceman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is some actual leadership looks like. It's not something that commes around every 4 years around election time trying to triangulate a voting block.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nthavoc@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Thanks. I needed a rally to know that. So what's the plan to stop this screw over without relying on the people to be cannon fodder and resort to violence? More rallies and fund raisers for the party of the meek and moral victories? Bit of /s in there.

[-] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

No, you are so right, why have rallies at all, when we can just let everyone think they are alone in their opposition to fascism. What's the point of letting the media and politicians know the current administration does NOT have a mandate.

Rallies unite and focus people. People meet at these rallies, become friends, form groups, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

it is about time. i am willing to be cannon fodder and start standing in front of tanks. let's shut down the ICE facilities

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Here's what I'd like someone to explain: suppose we have four (or even eight) years of president AOC.

Everything is going dandy. Palestine is recognized. Student loans are discharged. Maybe we're even on track to get a public option. Etc. We get everything we want.

It seems like it only takes 1 (ONE) election cycle for Dems / Liberals / Progressives to stay home and be like "naaah, I just don't feel it this year...Not gonna vote" to undo everything. Dems have had a slim majority in the house for the last 20 years. SC is one seat away from disaster.

We are only in month #2 of Orange Fucks presidency and look at all the damage he's done. We're back to square one. Nothing changes. I'm starting to get blackpilled about the whole democratic experiment. Someone give me some perspective please... I just don't trust the American voter any more. The only consistency is Maga will always show up to vote no matter what piece of shit is written on the ballot. Dems / Liberals / Progressives: we need to move mountains to get any political coalitions or clout to achieve anything.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

If the DNC wants to continue to exist they need to give up on the idea of being the good conservative party. That's why their base doesn't show up. You can only be held hostage for so long before you just give up and let happen what will happen.

If they would actually pass real reform and genuinely try to make the lives of the worst off better, they'd never have to worry about the republicans again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We must get rid of gerrymandering and the electoral college. Nothing will ever change until that shit is gone. Until then, rinse and repeat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If people get what they want they will come voting out in droves.

[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Liberals and progressives staying home wouldn't matter if the democratic party appealed to the working class as a whole instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Replacing the Citizen’s United court decision with actual law would go a really long way towards keeping corporate money out of politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

From here the outside ot really feels that you need to start another party now. Like nice rally and all of that but the dnc has been screwing you over every fuckin time.
Edit: Or a representative parliament system? That winner takes all shit shouldn't be...

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
151 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22613 readers
1853 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS