9

Summary

Donald Trump threatened to send American citizens convicted of vandalizing Tesla vehicles to El Salvador’s infamous Terrorism Confinement Center, labeling the vandals as "sick terrorist thugs" deserving 20-year sentences.

This statement followed a major vandalism incident in Ontario, Canada, where around 80 Tesla cars were damaged.

Trump’s comments coincide with controversy over his use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport migrants, halted by a court order.

The White House defended the deportation despite legal challenges, denying any violation of the court’s injunction.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

If you were waiting until it got to actual concentration camps before you were willing to call this fascism, well, here you go.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The camps aren't on American soil so it's only sparkling fascism.

[-] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The majority of the Nazis camps were not in Germany, so this is still “going by the book” as it were.

[-] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

If it didn't hurt, he wouldn't cry.

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People's reaction: "This is tyranny!"
The reality: This is delusional.

Trump doesn't have the power to give that kind of order and any official carrying it out can be convicted and imprisoned under state law that Trump can't pardon them for. He actually doesn't understand this despite being president once already because he either always has been retarded*, or got that way due to some sort of dementia.

*I mean that in the medical sense, not as an insult.

[-] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

MAGA:

  • Vandalise Tesla. ✋ Terrorist
  • Vandalise the U.S. Capitol. 👌 Patriot
[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Taking top secret documents to the shitter 👍 President.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I kinda want to dare them to deport me, a relatively well off white heterosexual male multi-gen native born US citizen, just so I have the pleasure of suing the ever loving fuck out of the government on as many fronts as are legally feasible. Every single minute infraction committed will be a knock-down, drag-out affair.

E: yeah this is dumb. I’m just frustrated.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I kinda want to dare them to deport me, a relatively well off white heterosexual male multi-gen native born US citizen, just so I have the pleasure of suing the ever loving fuck out of the government on as many fronts as are legally feasible. Every single minute infraction committed will be a knock-down, drag-out affair.

FIrst, the tough guy act impresses nobody. How well do you think you're going to do as a white boy that doesn't speak Spanish in a prison cell with 79 Venezuelan and El Salvadoran gang members? You'll be lucky if you survive the week.

Second, you'll never have a chance to sue. Trump isn't giving that option. He is arresting these people and deporting them to El Salvador before he even figures out who the hell they are. We can't even confirm they are even documenting who is being sent there. They could just be picking random people who look brown enough or who have the "wrong" tattoos, throwing them on a plane, and shipping them off. There's no court case involved. You'll be sitting in a cell, in El Salvador, 23.5 hours a day, 7 days a week. Forever. With no access to communication. No access to family visits. No access to a lawyer. How the fuck you gonna sue? You'll be lucky if you ever even talk to someone who speaks English again.

Maybe your family can sue on your behalf, if they even know where you are or what happened to you. Good luck with that. Maybe, Maybe if you're lucky, you'll be the .0000001% of cases the SC actually hears. After years of legal wrangling (where you'll be sitting in that cell the entire time for), the Supreme Court may very well issue a ruling for Donald Trump to completely ignore.

And the US courts have no jurisdiction over El Salvador's prisons. A US court demand for the release would just be met with being told to fuck right off.

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think you fully grasp the situation. You still seem to think that there are consequences for Trump when he breaks the law, and that the legal system in the US is still in-tact enough to grant you not only your freedom, but some compensation for your rights being trampled.

Yes, it is outrageously illegal for him to abduct Americans and send them to a black site on foreign soil with no due process. But he spent his entire last term positioning himself to be able to do and get away with outrageously illegal things this time around. He controls the department of justice and the supreme court. The supreme court has already given him an incredibly wide blanket for presidential immunity.

You might think "well, that's ok - as soon as the story gets out, people will be rioting in the streets!", but you have to remember that "independent media" is a thing that doesn't really exist anymore. All of the major news sources in print and on television are owned by a small handful of billionaires, and he is very good at keeping billionaires on side. Any information that gets out there will be downplayed immediately, and the news will be forgotten in a couple of days to be replaced by the latest shocking celebrity news or the latest atrocity Trump has committed.

You probably would get out eventually (provided you don't get sick and die or get beat to death by the guards or shanked or something), but you would be far, far worse off for the experience. The dream of vindication you'd get for sticking it to Trump would vanish like mist in the sun and you'd be left with the heart-wrenching reality that the life you had previously known is over, and you are at the mercy of the barbarians now.

[-] BreadAndThread@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Dude, these people are being disappeared. That means they're gone. Good luck ever seeing them again. Even as a white guy, you would suffer untold horrors we can't comprehend.

Anecdotally, I was a wild youngin decades ago and went to county jail for two weeks. Even jail was horrible, and they treat you like you're subhuman. It's freezing all the time, the showers are kept purposely boiling hot, and the food is inedible as it's pure sugar garbage. The loser guards finally have a leg up on other people and make sure they get their payback for their shitty lives. You poop and pee in public. As a woman, they literally limited the pads you could use, so I just bled through.

Now imagine you remove all those luxuries I just complained about, and you've got this type of prison.

[-] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm pessimistic about a lot of what people say Trump can't do, but he definitely can't do this one.

Edit: that's enough of this community. Y'all are way worse than even the politics and tanky subs on Reddit. Jesus, y'all need some help. Count me as another ally you threw away because you can't see past your own ignorance.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He can. They're basically just kidnapping people and whisking them out of the country before they have time to get legal representation or take it to court. And if a court does manage to rule that the deportations are illegal, Trump's forces ignore it and deport the people anyway. The only way to stop it is to physically obstruct the deportations, but who is doing that?

Trump has already started ignoring the courts. The rule of law no longer applies in the USA.

[-] VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

He literally already did. Legal US residents were shipped off to a concentration camp with no trial or due process. This is despite a judge ruling that he "can't."

He can. He did. He will again if we let him.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I want to agree with you, but why can't he? The courts aren't saying, "You can send these people to El Salvador because immigrants have fewer rights." The courts are saying, "They have rights, you can't send them there," and his admin is ignoring them. What's to stop an attempt to deport citizens?

I don't want to be blackpilled, but public backlash hasn't amounted to enough. Hopefully a greater public backlash will matter, but it seems like people don't recognize how dire the situation really is.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Theoretically, the citizens of the US would stop him from doing that. It's such an obvious an egregious violation of rights that (again, in theory) he would lose a lot of support over it and we'd potentially face riots and massive protests. This is probably what Trump wants though, so he and Musk have a reason to implement martial law and really take the mask off

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Theoretically, the citizens of the US would stop him from doing that.

There's your problem. Have you not been paying attention lately? Half the citizens want this. Even among those that don't, there's no appetite for violent protests.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hey, I see that you're mad about the people responding to you, but it's vital that you understand that the constitution is dead, the republic is over, we have a king now. We're maybe, generously, months from Congress dissolving itself at Trump's request. At this point, the Trump administration can and will do whatever they want; when there are no consequences for violating the law, the law does not exist. It's up to us, the people, to make them second guess and wonder if there will be consequences- in a better scenario, they would know there would be consequences, but I think we're past that.

All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.

[-] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

What are you doing then, or are you not a good person?

I'm not mad at all honestly, just disappointed. I would expect honesty and truth from this server, but all I get is doomer BS, insults, and false info. If y'all can't even be honest you're just another r/politics or r/conservative.

Have fun continuing to lose the country. If y'all can't tell the truth and then downvote accurate context y'all are just as bad as MAGA. I want no part in either.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Game it out.

Say he does this.

Say someone sues. Say they rule against Trump. Say it’s appealed, all the way to the Supreme Court, eventually, and say they actually take the case and rule against him in, at best, a narrow 5-4 ruling.

That’s pretty unlikely. And the defendant will have been in prison a long time, already. And he could just bring them back without much fanfare, as this is a hundred controversies back.

And say he defies the order, especially if the Supreme Court refuses to take it… Then what? Is congress going to harass him for a immigration case? That is political suicide, and the congresspeople would be at real risk of physical retribution too.

This is what populist, fascist dictatorships do. They can’t get away with everything, but they constantly push the envelope and game the systems, hence the orders he is already starting to push.

Obama, Biden, Bush, even Trump on 2016 couldn’t do this because the political support from a base wasn’t there, but now it is.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Newsflash: He can't do it. The Supreme Court would have to block it. If he does it to Tesla vandals then he can do it to anyone ... including Supreme Court judges. The SC judges are not that stupid ... anymore. It seems like one or two of them have spit Trumps balls out of their mouth.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not convinced. Even if they did find against him for something, he'd just defy it. MAGAs are actually looking forward to the point when they get to castrate the Supreme Court by openly ignoring their rulings.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I think the Supreme Court is starting to see what is coming. One of Trumps appointments may have flipped. You will never get Thomas to wake up, he will be praising Trump even when old Claerence is forced to divorce his wife because Trump outlaws interracial marriage (yea, that will be on the horizon)

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

I'm a Jesus Loving Family Values Republican and I have NO PROBLEM with him Sending my Wife and Children to a Terrorism Camp in EL SALVADOR!

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
9 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22655 readers
3218 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS