Another distraction from things that actually matter. This will have no material impact on anyone's life, but will dilute the news cycle.
Old fashioned, unreliable, can’t get off the ground…
And they released a concept study, too:
Apparently it’s going to be made by Boeing? It will go down in history for sure.
Hey, he just said most lethal aircraft. He did not specify friend or foe.
The F47 will be the most advanced, capable, and lethal aircraft ever built
It sure will be
It will go down
nice one.
So it will be an overly expensive, bloated, but ultimately ineffective jet that will become known for its much higher rate of friendly fire incidents than any other jet in history.
Also it will look ugly and have oddly small wings.
A 6-gen fueling system where it will be powered by praises alone and a suction system to eliminate waste.
It also has remote access capabilities used exclusively by Putin, but people seem totally fine with that part because the jet was promised to only be used to hurt the right people.
Don't forget the weird livery that is oddly orange and seemingly missing around all of the ports. Oh and it's fat.
F-15 - Eagle
F-16 - Fighting Falcon
F-35 - Lightening II
F-47 - Krasnov
These names are just getting worse with each new jet
F-16 is semi-officially known as the Viper these days.
F-35’s name is borrowed from the original (P-38) Lightning, arguably the best twin-engine long-range interceptor/patrol fighter made in the WW2 era.
Who fucking knows what they’ll try to call the new one irl, but I bet it’s something obnoxious and stupid
"The clown car"
Regardless of whatever the official moniker is, I’m greatly looking forward to whatever unofficial name the pilots and enlisted come up with.
Wasn't the f35 the FatAmy? (Don't flame me; please! I'm just repeating what a service buddy told me. She's the dick, if anyone; not me!)
lol yep, Fat Amy is the 35’s service nickname. So called because she’s a chonker, really not a great dogfighter, and isn’t that fast - in fact, the 35 is the first air-combat-focused plane procured by the DoD in a long while that isn’t area ruled.
The P-38 was more of a Fighter-Escort than an interceptor. The P-51 is the most widely accepted best fighter interceptor of WW2.
The P-38 was absolutely extremely versatile, but as for an interceptor, the Mustang was better all around as a fighter and interceptor. Faster, longer range, more agile, better armed for air-to-air combat, and lower stall speed.
The P-38s would escort bombers on the first leg and hand over to P-51s, over an active combat zone, because the P-51 was so superior of a fighter interceptor.
the role of the lightning changed with the introduction of the P-51 since the mustang was such a high performance long range bird that it remained relevant even as a jet far longer than any other converted prop to jet design. early in the war the lightning was almost exclusively used as an interceptor given its high top speeds but lower maneuverability. however, it also changed the way interceptor strategy was conceived forever. for example, the other famous interceptor of the war, the spitfire, was a pure dogfighter. it had a high top speed, good climbing performance, low wing loading for maneuverability, and no range. meanwhile the lighting was good for strafing enemy fighters before they ever had a chance to engage by just being insanely fast compared to the birds it was up against.
again though, it has everything to do with that fighters in WW2 were becoming obsolete at an astounding rate as manufacturing became more advanced as the war progressed. a plane introduced in one role at the start of its service might be relegated into another role within a year or two because operational realities shifted so much. i think there's no greater example of this than the Mitsubishi Zero. it started the war as an air supremacy fighter and ended its service as a guided bomb whose control module was a human being.
anyway. i'm rambling. by far the most interesting designs to me were the ones with long service lives. the p-38 and the p-51 are particularly interesting in that they both demonstrate that the united states was heavily focused on operational supremacy with their hardware designs. both were designed to operate at long ranges unsupported without sacrificing combat performance
Is that “piss yellow” by any chance?
“You really should be drinking more water, orange”
Maybe the car took a B vitamin.
I actually do not care. Don't get distracted, people!
You don't care, but think about the people who might.
A lot of Soviet generals walked away from Gorbachev over smaller insults than this.
I'll take it, but, bruh
This fucker is wildly attempting any/all paths to find a way to leave an indelible historical mark of himself...
Guess "Lyingist Liar First Felon Mafia Level Attempt at a President and Killer of US Democracy" isn't working for him...
He's already got an indelible place in history all right. And nothing he manages to accomplish from now till his death will be sufficient to erase that lasting legacy.
🤡 🤡 🖕 🖕
He's the Captain Sparrow of Presidents, can't spell infamous without famous.
Oof, sucks to be the team of engineers who made this thing. Naming it 47 guarantees it will be the laughing stock of the military. I don't care if its the most advanced jet in the world. With this target on its back it will get trash talked until the day they retire it.
The Fuck-47?
Fascist-47
My retired neighbor has an F-45 Tshirt that he procured during his first term.
Pretty silly to tie your name to an unproven fighter jet. Then again, he's not known for having good judgment in the first place.
An unproven fighter jet made by fucking Boeing of all companies.
Boeing technicians have the opportunity to do the funniest thing
Invite him to ride in it...?
The F47 will be the most advanced, capable, and lethal aircraft ever built.
O rly?
Boeing, a US aerospace giant, has been awarded a lucrative contract to build the Next Generation Air Dominance fighter
lmaoooooooooooooooooooo
More on news tonight.... A new F-47 has evaded capture for a second time this week by shooting bone spurs and safety doors...
Will it have a combat avoidance feature? In keeping with the man it's named after.
F-47 bonespur
The details of the plane remain secret, with only a portion of the prototype shown in a photo displayed to reporters.
Come on War Thunder, do you magic and expose the F-47 Orange.
So we have the legendaries:
P51 Mustang
F14 Tomcat
F22 Raptor
A10 Warthog
F117 Nighthawk
SR71 Blackbird
And then:
F47 Trump? 🤢🤮🤮🤮
It's gonna suck seeing that in aviation history books.
What's the difference between an A10 and an F47?
One's named after an ugly, foul-smelling pig and the other is a Warthog.
Should've named it F-310N
That's literally the Nato name for the su-57, the Russian attempt to make a 5gen fighter.
If it ain't an A-10 Warthog going brrrrrrr with its 30mm canon I sleep.
Let the ‘hog die the graceful end it deserves - in the hearts and memories of ground pounders. The Frogfoots are getting wrecked in Ukraine when they try to do CAS, that mission is over unless you’re splattering goat herders, and even militants have MANPADs now.
Super Tucano is all you need for low intensity/asymmetrical conflict and COIN, otherwise busting tanks is better done by ATGMs and AT mines.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
