368
submitted 2 months ago by arotrios@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary:


The Trump administration’s proposal to vet social media profiles of green card applicants already legally in the U.S. has been condemned in initial public feedback as an attack on free speech.

Visa applicants living abroad already have to share their social media handles with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, but the proposal under President Donald Trump would expand the policy to those already legally in the country who are applying for permanent residency or seeking asylum.

USCIS said the vetting of social media accounts is necessary for “the enhanced identity verification, vetting and national security screening.”

The agency also said it was necessary to comply with Trump’s executive order titled “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats.”

“In a review of information collected for admission and benefit decisions, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) identified the need to collect social media identifiers (‘handles’) and associated social media platform names from applicants to enable and help inform identity verification, national security and public safety screening, and vetting, and related inspections,” the agency announced on March 5.

President Donald Trump’s administration has proposed vetting the social media handles of immigrants already legally in the U.S. who are applying for green cards or permanent citizenship. The plan has been condemned as a ‘violation of the First Amendment.’


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 2 months ago

So basically he wants to deport legal residents for Luigiposting, making fun of Tesla, or acknowledging that Palestinians and trans people are humans.

Can we please switch to the timeline where Bernie just finished his second term and the Mango Mussolini is in jail for the rest of his miserable life? Pretty please with porn on top?

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

1st Amendment means nothing to these fascists

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

Elon Musk is silent about freedom of speech all of a sudden

[-] astutemural@midwest.social 56 points 2 months ago

Anyone think about what they used to do before we started making indelible records of all our social activity? Probably ask you some questions and that's it. Yet now they think it's 'vital' that they be able to see everything you ever said to your friends? Bullshit it is, they're just powerhungry petty tyrants.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

Just another reason to avoid the US like a plague. On the other hand, with bird flu and measles running more or less unchecked in a country with a horrible health system and an antivaxxer at the helm for health, avoiding the US is avoiding the plague.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Or just get vaccinated. Zero excuses.

[-] mzesumzira@leminal.space 6 points 2 months ago

Vaccines usually aren't a 100% shield. If enough people around you are unvaccinated, you may be at risk too.
Immunity comes in numbers.

That without counting potential mutations in such a favourable environment.
I'd stay out of the US for the foreseeable future.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago
[-] aramova@infosec.pub 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Likely considered not adhering to conditions and having their card cancelled.

Legal or not, that's how these fascists work.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago

I guess they don't get their green card ?

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Prison most likely

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 35 points 2 months ago

So, to be a greencard holder, you need to run at least one social media account that is active?

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

He probably prefers X. His homie has turned it into a hangout for all the other nazi homies.

.......can you tell I don't like the word "homie", and would like to give it a negative vibe?

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 months ago

"I don't use social media"

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

ICE: "Hands behind your back. Stop resisting!"

[-] peteyestee@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

"why don't you use social media? What are you hiding?"

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

If/when this gets to citizens, they’re gonna be so mad about my dissing them on the Internet that Elon is gonna try to build an even bigger spaceship to launch me directly into a Kuiper Belt object.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Honestly? If there are windows, I'd like to join you.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 22 points 2 months ago

People need to stop centralizating on big tech platforms with direct ties to us government.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 months ago

privacy matters, folks.

[-] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Green card = legally a Permanent US Resident, protected by us law.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

From a MAGA perspective:

Green card = foreigner, deport them.

[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

I hate talking to them. Because they outright don't think green card people should have rights

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yes, this if for the applicants for a green card, so he basically wants people to invade their privacy if they want to become a permanent citizen.

[-] peteyestee@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Might as well get them used to lack of privacy from the get-go.

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

This is about people applying to get a green card.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

With each passing day, the Dark Forest theory of social media seems all the more prescient....

[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Start your formal profiles (FB, Insta, LinkedIn, the ones that boomers know about) and post neutral stuff sparingly. Go hog wild on the ones you'll never admit to having. Just use a different email address.

[-] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Do not do this. A different email address will not hide anything about what you do online from Meta or xitter or any data broker that sells all your data to them.

The US is going down the path of social credit score like China at this point, anything you say can and will be used against you.

[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Why have more than account on the older platforms? That's not what I mean at all.

[-] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Make any account with any email address on any service that shares data with any data broker and use this account for about a week.

They'll have enough data on you to tie the activity to your actual name and physical devices by the end of the week, usually sooner.

[-] shani66@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago

Not if you take steps to prevent that. You'd have to be seriously paranoid to be in the clear, but you can spoof a lot of identifying data and your general activity is almost certainly not enough to pin you down specifically.

[-] Exeous@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

What of peoples not in us? He demand see profile to?

You not have account, you not travel to us?

You have account he see all detail of life in eu?

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Looks like you’re not compliant. Off to prison with you.

[-] biegoditch@lemmy.cafe 9 points 2 months ago

I only have a few lemmy throwaways

[-] AizawaC47@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Visa applicants living abroad already have to share their social media handles with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, but the proposal under President Donald Trump would expand the policy to those already legally in the country who are applying for permanent residency or seeking asylum.

Green card, visa applicants, seeking asylum… and then when does it come to actual us American citizens then? Especially those that were born here? Like when will it come to us all?

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago

He probably got that idea from Kathy Hochul's CCIA, which mandated anyone getting a pistol permit, or semi-auto hunting rifle permit to fork over all social media logins.

That was, of course, knocked down, as a 1A infringement, rightfully so. I'm guessing the SCOTUS will love this version, though.

[-] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'm not even religious, but I still know about the Whore of Babylon.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I didn't know my mom was Babylonian

[-] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

I'd bet she's a neo-chaldean.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I'd Hittite that.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
368 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23920 readers
2352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS