32
submitted 4 days ago by Mex@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] martini1992@lemmy.ml 24 points 4 days ago

"Sorry to the inhabitants of the proposed Stevenson Avenue, your road has been cancelled due to leaves on the plot, a member of staff will guide you to our tent replacement service."

[-] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

Leaves on the line are actually a surprisingly nasty issue since they screw up adhesion. There was a nasty crash last year because of it that cut off a good chunk of Wales from the rest of the network.

[-] martini1992@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Oh I don't doubt it. Doesn't stop it being a cliché though :P

[-] Zip2@feddit.uk 13 points 4 days ago

I can see this ending with replacement mobile homes.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Strange (or maybe not, I imagine there's a lot of overlap with the work they do and constructing homes).

I won't complain about more houses being built.

[-] Mex@feddit.uk 11 points 4 days ago

The Japanese rail companies use this model, building housing, retail and hotels near their lines to increase ridership.

Hell half of London was built this way.

[-] Highstronaught@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

And most of the u.s.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

Also built in anti-NIMBY defences. Easy transport for the raw materials too, the more I think about it the more wins there are.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The houses will be in insufficient quantity and in poor location to make rail transport of materials viable. The houses are going where the goods sidings used to be.

[-] insinerate@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Do we all have to stand up in them?

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Both Network Rail and LCR have already been working in this space for a long time; this is more about increasing the scale than about doing something new.

Reading is an interesting example; all those big towers and blocks that have sprung up around the station in the last decade? The vast majority are on what was previously railway land.

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"I'm afraid that you will not be allowed back into your home today. The Met Office [or whatever it's called] has said that the weather pattern is for snow. Unfortunately, it's the wrong type for your locale. Please make alternative living arrangements until further notice."

Why not? They've failed miserably at delivering cost effective rail transport - it's cheaper to fly from your local airport on Ryanair to Spain and back to the local nearest destination airport - they might as well have a go at fucking up housing.

Guessing that the 'houses' are actually train carriages that have been continually stuck in sidings since time immemorial.

[-] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 6 points 4 days ago

But network rail don't run any trains

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

Never let facts get in the way of a good joke.

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Oh! You and your 'facts' are soooo out-dated. We don't do that anymore. This is my truth.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
32 points (97.1% liked)

United Kingdom

4609 readers
308 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS