16
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LtCmdr@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago

Odd choice of enterprise. The cheapest one to license maybe?

Hiya Toys is pushing their Kelvin line pretty hard, though they also have the license for some SNW stuff - there's an Anson Mount Pike figure available.

What the fuck Enterprise is that? It looks awful.

[-] haverholm@kbin.earth 4 points 2 days ago

Per the article,

This brand new REPLICAart Series U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 figure […] is based on the iconic design from the 2009 film, Star Trek, meticulously replicates the NCC-1701’s appearance and intricate details.

[-] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 2 days ago

My unpopular opinion is that while the 2009 Enterprise does not look at all like the starships I know and love (more) it is definitely doing it's own thing in a unique (and tonally consistent with the Ambramsverse movies) way that I appreciate.

The design language for those films is a sort of 2010's retro-futurism that just lands really well IMO.

[-] AndorianSoup@mastodon.social 2 points 2 days ago

@Kirk @haverholm
I appreciate it. Although Engineering is just wrong (multiple warpcores? You having a laugh?)

I know what the movie says, but those have gotta be antimatter storage pods, yeah?

[-] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

100%. Even if Scotty called them warp cores (I don't recall) he was probably just kidding. Or drunk on green stuff.

The line is,

Okay. If we eject the core and detonate, the blast could be enough to push us away! I cannae promise anything, though!

It's interesting that the dialogue is the singular "core," while the VFX shows multiple ejections.

I'm sticking with antimatter pods.

[-] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, they probably shunted those for a bigger explosion. Perfect Watsonian explanation 🙂

[-] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

Thinking about that engine room makes me want to be a Star Wars fan.

How odd. I just watched that a couple weeks ago but don’t remember it looking that… bubbly

[-] lordgreylock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

ikr, out of all the ones to choose from. They chose poorly.

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

11213 readers
74 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll busmittions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissure Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"
01-24 Film "Section 31"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS