58
Fun article about Lynch’s Dune Premiere (www.wired.com)
submitted 1 year ago by reddig33@lemmy.world to c/moviesandtv@lemmy.film
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I would love to see the “lost” footage mentioned in this article. Would make a great expanded mini series for some streamer. I know after this flopped that a four hour version ended up in syndicated TV, but this article mentions there’s like seven hours of cut scenes!

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NoiseColor@startrek.website 17 points 1 year ago

I'm a big fan of the movie, i never understood why people didn't like it. It's a classic. One of the rare scifi that gives you this grandiose feeling of being in a big universe with lots of politics and interests everywhere. The new dune doesn't give you this feeling. The new one is generic scifi. Not that I don't like it, but if a story is happening in the year 10.000 than the setting should be strange, esoteric, hard to comprehend. This old movie tried to do this, the new one doesn't have that.

[-] xyzzy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like both, but I agree 100% with your characterization of the original movie. The world of the distant future, and even the cultures within it, should feel utterly bizarre and occasionally incomprehensible. I love the original movie.

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

The old movie was a fever dream crossed with an acid trip.
Dunno about the new one being generic sci-fi. I mean, I think you're wrong but i wouldn't be able to guess how you formed that opinion so I can't begin to argue it.

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When I watch a Villeneuve sci-fi it all feels very safe and respectable, like the folks involved don't want to stray too far from the source material and invite any controversy into the production or reception of the film.

It all feels very slick and clever the way advertising and marketing often does.

I enjoyed the film, but in no way did I feel like anyone involved had anything to say or any personality of their own.

The 80s Dune oozes personality and creativity.

[-] DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

When I watch a Villeneuve sci-fi it all feels very safe and respectable, like the folks involved don't want to stray too far from the source material

I mean there was at least one rather substantial change in Arrival from the Chiang short story that made it pretty different from my perspective. Wasn’t aware there was source material for 2049 beyond the screenplay. Adapting Dune is another animal to be sure. But I’m not sure about the generalization to all of Villeneuve’s sci-fi.

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Well. I hate when directors come in to an already strong story and make a bunch of unnecessary changes for no reason. Watching the new Dune movie, I felt that it had been made by people who actually had an amount of respect for the source material, rather than as a vehicle for whatever "vision" they felt like shoehorning into it.
80s Dune was good and wild, it wasn't Dune.

[-] NoiseColor@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

It feels like the year 2200 not the year 10000. I know that's strange to say. Everything is familiar, it could be another movie. When I watch it, my mind doesnt start to wonder about the back stories of people, buildings,... I don't have to use my brain, it's all there.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I just don't understand why the new one exists at all. Dune was already re-done as a perfectly acceptable mini-series on the sci-fi channel.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This was an amazing article. Loved reading through each interview.

Harlan Ellison: "Frank is holding it back because it's a dog" Frank: "It's not a dog, I never held it back. Harlan has a chip on his shoulder. "

[-] moipe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Aw. This is the "Dune" I liked. The new one wasn't nearly cheesey enough and filled with whisper talking and took forever to get anywhere.

[-] 2br02b@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I wonder what is the tone of the movie?

[-] mihnt@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I think they were trying to go the Bladerunner route with this reboot. Y'know, feast for the eyes as well.

[-] kingmongoose7877@lemmy.film 4 points 1 year ago

What, the Lynch Dune wasn't a feast for the eyes??

[-] mihnt@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

No, no, not saying it wasn't. I'm just saying they leaned on what they did with Bladerunner 2049. Not that it's a bad thing because I personally enjoy the new movies.

I did grow up with memories of the Lynch films though and every time I saw Kyle MacLachlan in anything it immediately would remind me of Dune. I only learned Alicia Witt was in it a couple of years ago which kind of blew my mind.

[-] wahming 1 points 1 year ago

https://archive.ph/qKZls

[-] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

As much as I love Lynch's Dune, I have no need to see the stuff that got cut. I remember the Alan Smithee edit. I understood exactly why those added scenes were left out in the original release. The quality was just lacking

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

paywall :/

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
58 points (95.3% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

17 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!

Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)

Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
admin@lemmy.film