337

Ireland: Wind generation exceeds demand for electricity for the first time ever (www.euronews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Auto tldr bot missed this:

Currently, the country’s electricity grid is only permitted to have a maximum of 75 per cent renewables in its energy mix. That meant that some of the energy was exported to Britain and Ireland had to meet the rest of the demand using fossil fuels.

This limit has gone up over the years from 50 to 75 per cent since 2011 and is set to increase further to 95 per cent by 2030. It is in place because using entirely renewable power means changes have to be made to the country’s electricity grid.

[-] Skua@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

I suppose at least if it was exported to the UK, it was hopefully still displacing some fossil fuel usage

[-] sugartits@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The UK sometimes has an excess of green energy as well.

I'm on a limited trial where I sometimes get completely free electricity for a couple of hours on specific days (my provider emails the day before to let me know and opt in).

I can charge my car, my solar batteries (they can charge from the grid if instructed), run the dishwasher, washing machine. And it costs nothing.

And then during the peak usage times, I'm using less power as I've done the stuff I would have done in those peak hours.

They don't do this from the goodness of their heart: there is an excess of energy available and they want it used instead of turning off production. Hopefully this rolls out to more areas soon.

I used to be on an "agile" tariff where the price changes every 30 minutes. Sometimes the price would go negative and I'd get paid to use energy. A good opportunity to turn on some fan heaters and warm the garden. Those flowers look a little chilly.

[+] WindowCreep@lemmy.world -17 points 1 year ago

Why do they have to burn fossil fuels? That's fucking stupid

[-] dependencyInjection@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

Im torn between giving an upvote for asking a question or giving a downvote for your following sentence given the answer was in the comment you were replying to.

Also, if you ask a question wouldn’t it be wise to wait for the answer before also passing judgement on something.

“Why is this like this? That’s fucking dumb.” Doesn’t quite work does it? How can it be dumb if you don’t know how it works. Why should we trust your assessment on its dumbness if you’ve already conceded you don’t know.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

They’re not asking how, they’re asking why. And something can absolutely appear as dumb without you knowing why something is one way or another.

It might not be dumb, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it doesn’t look dumb. Besides that’s entirely subjective.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Base load generators cant adjust their output quickly enough to match the daily demand curve. Your options are to keep them online at a fixed level 24/7, or cut them entirely. If you don't have enough renewable production to meet overnight demand, you have to meet that demand with base load generators, which means you have to keep those generators online. If you have to keep them online, and wind is providing more power than is being demanded, you have to cut the wind production to match demand.

To get those (usually coal-fired) generators offline, you need to drop your overnight consumption, add storage, switch to non-fossil baseload generators (nuclear), use less efficient "peaker" plants (usually gas turbine generators fired by natural gas or oil), or some combination thereof.

You're right, it is "fucking stupid", but it is due to the functional limitations of the equipment they currently have available. With those limitations, the best option is to export your excess wind production to someone who needs it, and improve your own grid to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

[-] WindowCreep@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Makes more sense now 👌

[-] maporita@unilem.org 12 points 1 year ago

Renewables suffer from intermittency .. production depends on whether the wind is blowing or the sun is shining .. and they can't be ramped up quickly to cope with increased demand. So you need a baseline source to take care of that and the only options we have are fossil fuel or nuclear.

[-] Olap@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ireland outlawed nuclear in 1999. Not a NATO member quite famously too

[-] bloubz@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Nuclear can't be ramped up quickly either, as you said it's the stable baseline

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing that it can be ramped up ahead of time, the grid will know when peak demands are during the day and during special events.

[-] Hugohase@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Actually, they just can't be ramped, neither fast nor slow. What is done is just wasting part of the (heat)-energy that is produced. If you want to utilize NPPs you need storage, just like with renewables but more expensive to build.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

You need some way of matching generation and consumption. "Peaker plants" and "Storage" are the typical answers, but they are not the only ones available.

We currently operate primarily on a "supply shaping" model, where we assume consumers are going to use whatever they want, whenever they want, and we adjust our production to match. They will pay a fixed price per kWh, without regard to the effects of their load on the grid. Responsibility for matching is entirely on the supplier.

We could shift our focus toward a "demand shaping" model, where we incentivize some of our (large, industrial) customers to go offline during peak hours, or switch to off-peak schedules to raise the base load.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

Baseload generation can be ramped up or down, yes. But, can't be ramped up or down fast enough to meet variations in daily demand. You can't slow it down fast enough in the evening to follow the drop off as everyone goes to bed. You can't speed it up fast enough in the morning as everyone wakes up and gets to work.

You have to keep it running at a nearly constant output level.

Generators that can be ramped up and down fast enough to match the demand curve are known as "peaker plants". Baseload plants are extremely efficient; peakers are much less efficient. Baseload plants use a few, giant steam turbines. Peakers typically use a large number of small, gas turbines, or even reciprocating engines.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can’t force the wind to blow or the sun to shine. Hydroelectric is different.

[-] thethirdobject@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It is in place because using entirely renewable power means changes have to be made to the country's electricity grid.

[-] stainless@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Just did a bike tour through Ireland and can confirm: is windy.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Wind power generation temporarily exceeded the total demand for electricity in Ireland for the first time ever this week.

Though Storm Agnes brought strong winds across the country, it isn’t unusual for it to reach this level.

What was unusual was the fact that it surpassed the demand on Ireland’s electricity grid throughout the entire island for the first time.

That meant that some of the energy was exported to Britain and Ireland had to meet the rest of the demand using fossil fuels.

In August, the amount of energy generated by wind increased by 71 per cent when compared to the same month last year.

The latest figures mean that in total, Irish wind farms provided 32 per cent of the country’s power over the first eight months of 2023.

The original article contains 438 words, the summary contains 131 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[+] Rearsays@lemmy.ml -19 points 1 year ago

I don’t morally dislike wind turbines but wow that’s ugly.

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

You don't "morally" dislike wind turbines, but you went on the internet and took time to tell people that you believe they are "ugly".

I mean fuck it, right? Roughly 250,000 deaths a year at present, guaranteed to grow, but you don't like how it looks. How do you think coal powered power plants look? Oil refineries are also pretty easy on the eyes, yeah?

[-] Rearsays@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

You feel very strongly it seems. Aren’t we trying to protect this planet? None of those turbines are even trying to use the anti bird strike paint to protect the native species.

[-] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've been impacted by anime wind turbine pictures and think it is kinda pretty and optimist-futuristic. E: but the huger ones are prettier.

[-] Rearsays@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

I wish I could feel this way.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023

337 points (99.4% liked)

World News

39001 readers

1058 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

quinten@lemmy.world

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world