338
submitted 1 year ago by DaEagle@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LilDumpy@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago

Someone is really out to get lemmy.world lately.

I feel like with every update there is at least one attack.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 year ago

We're having fun and trying to build a positive space. And we have real potential to succeed in growing large. Can you think of a single faster way to attract trolling on the internet?

It's a lot more likely than someone like spez taking a break from plundering his company to piss off a modest number of internet randos in some internet corner somewhere, which would barely be a drop in the bucket of his problem anyway.

The overall effect of this is so small, it almost has to be someone(s) with too much time on their hands. If they had any kind of real power, they wouldn't be wasting their time on these chump change attacks.

[-] sab@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly, decentralized social media are probably bad news for the current state of the art of disinformation campaigns. The bullshit that has been thriving on Facebook and Twitter is not only a chorus of bigoted aunts and uncles, but (perhaps more importantly) a coordinated attack from state sponsored troll farms seeking, among other things, to destabilise Western democracies.

The fediverse is, by design, less vulnerable to these attacks. Your trolls can generate activity around your disinformation content all they want: if nobody I follow boosts it, it's not going to show up in my Mastodon feed. And you can feel free to recreate r/conservative or whatever in the fediverse, but if it becomes a cesspool like on Reddit you'll be stuck with your trolls talking to each other on a defederated instance with no-one listening. Disinformation strategies currently employed successfully on centralized social media platforms are likely to fail here, causing a problem for bad actors.

It is probably paranoid to think there's any geopolitical actor behind the current attack, but I fully expect the fediverse to become under attack from Russian troll farms as soon as they realize they're no longer reaching out to people on Twitter, Reddit or Facebook.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

a coordinated attack from state sponsored troll farms seeking, among other things, to destabilise Western democracies

If you don't think state sponsored troll farms exist in the "West," I've got a bridge to sell you.


From 2011: US government working on Persona Management "sock puppet" software to flood forums with pro-US talking points

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks


From 2013: US ally Israel pays Israeli college students to defend Israeli government online

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/08/14/israel-students-social-media/2651715/


From 2014: Reddit lists Eglin Air Force base as the most "Reddit Addicted City"

https://old.reddit.com/r/Blackout2015/comments/4ylml3/reddit_has_removed_their_blog_post_identifying/


From 2014: Research done at Eglin Air Force Base in 2014 about influence of opinions through "a decentralized potential field-based influence algorithm is developed in this work to ensure that all individuals’ states achieve consensus asymptotically to a desired convex hull spanned by the stationary leaders’ states, while maintaining consistent influence between individuals (i.e., network connectivity)."

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.5644.pdf


From 2018: Facebook works with Cambridge Analytica to undermine US elections

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html


Can we stop acting like we're the fucking good guys in this? It's absolutely fair that there are Russian troll-farms pushing disinformation, but to act like there are only Russian troll farms and they only exist to destabilize western democracies is a fucking joke.

Last I checked, there are plenty of US conservatives and rich people who want to dismantle democracy and these people own fucking news organizations, we don't even need to go to Russian troll farms for that horseshit. It's fucking home-grown. (I mean Musk and Murdoch weren't even born in America and these two dipshits control some of the biggest names in US media I can think of, and both of these motherfuckers hate democracy. Reddit's Steve Huffman literally looks up to Musk. Facebook is MAGA central because of Mark Zuckerberg.)

So let's stop acting like the phone call isn't coming from inside the house. When the state-actors show up, it's gonna be all of them not just some of them.

[-] sab@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

You'll notice I only mentioned Russia once, and not even in the paragraph you cited. The Russian troll farms are without doubt the most famous, and they have backed candidates like Farage, Trump and Le Pen with uncanny success. But it would be incredibly naive to think other actors are not involved with similar strategies, which is why I kept my post general. Steve Bannon has his ties to Russia, but he's American as apple pie.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I agree with this entirely.

[-] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe it was their refusal to take a stance on Meta and Threads? The admins of .ml said it took them 2 minutes to decide to preemptively defederate. .World on the other hand came to an anti-corporate platform and publicly took a position that they would wait and see about federation with Meta.

It's like saying "power to the people and viva revolution but we are also remaining open to licking boot depending on the circumstances."

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I do not believe that the Fediverse is an exclusively anti-corporate platform. It's nature is open to all, even corporations, at a technical level.

Granted, many anti-corporate people came here, but that doesn't make this a fundamently anti-corporate place. Just their specific communities.

I also doubt many serious Fediverse types are that petty and childish. That's generally a trait of more short-sighted people. Not a lot of native trolls here, we came here in many cases to escape that behavior.

Is it so strange to think some assholes might just chase us down and bring it to us? What would you do if you were a hate-fueled asshole that wanted to watch the world burn? I'd find nice things and fuck them up, personally. That would be both fun and potentially effective.

[-] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

The FOSS alternative to the big corporate controlled social media corps that swallow up smaller social media alternatives is not anti-corporate? Ok.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Linux runs on something like 90% of corporate servers. Amazon's AWS runs its own version of Linux and is the largest cloud provider in existence.

This means, by and large, the labor done on a volunteer basis by random internet nerds to create Linux and all its tools has unintentionally been the largest transfer of wealth created by labor from the working class to the corporate class in fucking history.

FOSS means anyone can use it for any reason. Including organizations you reasonably fucking hate using it for reasons you fucking hate.

It's literally why in the last few years you had maintainers of open source projects sabotaging their own projects when learning what it is being used for, or trying to make "new rules" that don't allow certain organizations to use their code (pro-tip, if they can access your code, they can use it).

Only now is the FOSS community waking up to the fact that corporations are using their open ideals to profit off of their labor very handsomely.

If there's one thing that capitalism is excellent at, it's taking valid critiques of capitalism, and then repackaging those critique and selling them back to the very public that is critiquing them. There's a reason Meta has already jumped in on ActivityPub, because its a new market to exploit.

The early internet was nothing but counterculture and lack of corporations. Corporations showed up because it was a new market to exploit and they used their largess to dominate the conversation. It happened before, it will happen again.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sangle_of_flame@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

it's one of the biggest instances, not really surprising that bad actors are targeting it

[-] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a shame. Hosting a high visibility server is no joke, and I don't envy the admins and the very difficult work they do. It's simultaneously an argument for and against decentralization. For - a single instance can get knocked out without talking out the whole fediverse. Against - it seems as though high visibility communities are potentially fairly easy to target and take down.

I think that decentralization wins out here in the end, but it does feel like there may be a need for some sort of fallback mechanism to be in place at an instance/community level. I suspect this might evolve somehow over time. It would require some way to expand trust between instances and or portability of communities (which could be fraught with user trust/data integrity issues).

If things don't evolve it could grow into a whack-a-mole game for bad actors, or there might need to be more investment into server infrastructure (which could work against decentralization if only because of economies of scale).

Or maybe there's no issue after all? I'm just imagining potential implications of a scaling fediverse - it's fascinating and exciting stuff!

Thoughts?

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago

This is the primary reason why I'm ok for my instance to not grow massively. We got 10K people and we have pretty good traffic ,without overloading us or making too much of a target. We still get new users since we allow registrations, but the application requirements retain the quality

[-] 6db@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm realizing that I signed up for a probably-at-risk instance (lemmy.ml). I'm quite left but not necessarily an anarchist so it would seem applying to lemmy.dbzer0.com wouldn't be a good move. (But I did enjoy reading your application requirements!) Recs on other small but reliable instances?

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

You don't need to be an anarchist to apply to lemmy.dbzer0.com. Just follow the rules.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chozo@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

a single instance can get knocked out without talking out the whole fediverse

Honestly, it may as well have in this case. LemmyWorld is the de facto "hub" for basically the entire Threadiverse right now. All the major communities are seeing the most activity through LemmyWorld. While I'm subscribed to a lot of communities from other instances, sometimes duplicates of ones found on LemmyWorld, losing LemmyWorld would still a huge chunk of the content that I'm trying to see.

I really do wish that more specialized instances would sprout up and that some of these communities could cluster together across multiple pockets of the Threadiverse. I feel like this makes it less likely to lose huge chunks of content, and also makes fewer large targets for somebody to want to attack in the first place.

[-] anonymoose@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You don't need to necessarily centralize to defend against DDos or similar attacks. You can add things like Cloudflare for DDos mitigations, CDN and maybe something like Kubernetes for horizontal scaling of servers (spin up more servers to handle extended load) transparently behind the scenes. This can also get you the benefits of low geographical latency, so a load-balancer fetches you data from the closest replica of a database geographically, etc.

Of course, all this adds up in terms of cost, but I think this might be worth it for the largest instances. I suppose that can still be considered centralization.

If we wanted to encourage small many small instances instead, perhaps there could be a transparent load-balancer layer for the fediverse that instances could sign up for, that is managed by a devops group. Alternatively, lemmy could have built-in load-balancing, caching, etc. as part of its codebase that instance operators can set up with their own accounts at Cloudflare, etc.

[-] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Ultimately, that's the point. There are solutions (with ongoing vigilance required) but it comes with an ongoing cost, be it server infrastructure or human resources).

I think the federated load balancer might be interesting but I expect there are many pitfalls that need to be considered and addressed wrt security, trust and integrity of data.

Anyway, it's amazing to see this all grow and evolve.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bastion@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think this might be interesting:

  • permit separate, low-traffic, highly rate-limited, auth-only servers. They would be strictly rate-limited and only accept connections from whitelisted partner servers, because they only handle auth.
  • any partner server can authenticate a user and handle content for the server/auth-server pair, but only does so under certain conditions (determined by the partner - all the time, when ping api call > n seconds, or manually, for example)
  • user@lemmy.world can't log in, so the client tries the list of partnered servers. user succeeds at lemmy.partner.net.
  • user@lemmy.world@partner.net says.. '..something' and all other servers accept it as being from user@lemmy.world
  • lemmy.world recovers,, and claims all of the @lemmy.world@partner.net posts. Partners then forget the extra stuff they've been hosting.
[-] Calcipher@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem with these types of redundancy schemes is that it simply takes a Internet backbone hiccough (or AWS fuck up) to cause there to be multiple primaries (i.e. lemmy.world is online still, but some portion of the internet can't see it, so a replica promotes itself to primary, people use both, how do you reconcile it).

This is not even beginning to talk about the nightmare scenarios possible if someone hacks a replica.

Edit: Still, this is a good thought and similar to how some actual software packages do things.

[-] bastion@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

A lot of those issues of 'multiple primaries' can be resolved with intelligent data types and actions. That is, if we have a notion of how the data is organized, a lot of decisions can be made a priori. Ones that can't can be read-only during a split.

Comment groups are mergeable sets. Any unique comment is a valid comment.

For any individual comment, any tombstone causes a comment to be unseeable (and ideally be deleted). Any edits are latest-wins.

A lot can be sorted out that way - enough to be usable. Some databases even support that on a db level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jaxia@toast.ooo 11 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the update. Was wondering why I was having issues logging in.

[-] TheInsane42@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Drat, someone really doesn't like lemmy.world and how active it became.

[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Big target. Either that or the butt wipe that was denied his Reddit username and started creating random long manned communities.

I just sort of assumed we’d all get accounts in 2-3 instances so if one goes down we can still participate elsewhere.

[-] Jarmer@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Also the other instance I was using ... vlemmy.net ... has been down for like a week now. I wonder if it's completely done for?

[-] remkit@lemmy.kya.moe 13 points 1 year ago

Definitely dead according to some of the other posts I've seen

[-] Jarmer@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Do you know what happened to it? Just curious.

[-] trouser_mouse@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The server was torn to shreds by raccoons. That's what I heard.

[-] jochem@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago
[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

How's its admin holding up?

[-] anonymoose@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

To shreds, you say?

[-] LilDumpy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Someone is really out to get lemmy.world lately.

I feel like with every update there is at least one attack.

[-] catlover@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

maybe that dude with the mass random communities name

[-] LilDumpy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Oh ya, I forgot about that guy. What even is the point of doing that?

[-] erre@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Wasn't that the person that hacked a few instances a week or two ago? @LMAO@lemmy.world

[-] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Logged on from Lemmy.world through voyager to see if this comment posts…

[-] gonta@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

I can see your comment from my instance page :)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LilDumpy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ya. I'm still logged in through the Liftoff app and able to post. Idk why my first comment on this post was duplicated though.

[-] RxBrad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No doubt Threads-related...

Quite a few people on here really go off-the-rails when it comes to .world not coming out and outright blocking it before it's a thing. (while also forgetting it affects Mastodon, and not-so-much Lemmy)

[-] Courbet_eiro@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I have also had problems with my lemmy.ml account. Maybe the same attack??

[-] gonta@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I wonder who is behind this and what's the intention.

[-] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Speznaz, probably. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[-] Arotrios@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Looks like lemmy.world is back up. vlemmy.net is still down.

[-] wallguy22@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

vlemmy.net has been down for a week or two at this point and the admins took down their donation links. I think it’s safe to say they’re not coming back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
338 points (99.4% liked)

Fediverse

17734 readers
58 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS