13

The tech billionaire and Trump adviser “donated” Starlink service to the White House. The move resembles a previous maneuver by Microsoft, which used “free” trials to lock in costly upgrades across the federal government.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Netrunner@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

The difference here is that felon charges the government a fuckload to use Starlink already. Trial was years ago.

[-] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

remember the time that Leon Skum turned starlink off for Ukraine just before a Russian attack?

he can never again be trusted. especially when it comes to safety and security

[-] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

After all of the sketchy contracts that musk seems to be getting under this regime, the next administration should nationalize SpaceX. With their corrupt self dealing, perhaps give him a dollar or so for it.

[-] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Americans don’t have HALF the balls. Cowards to the last.

[-] Viri4thus@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

100% this.

The well regulated militia in the most armed country in the world is just the typical exceptionalism story. Talk is cheap but when it comes to act, americans are just little bitches. Hollywood can whitewash the history later.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Folded like a lawn chair the second a dictator pops up to pry every past remaining bit of wealth and power out of our hands.

[-] ebolapie@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

For decades the American left has been, on the whole, anti-firearms. There simply are not enough of us who own and train with guns. If/when a civil war happens we lose. And that's before you start taking into account drones and surveillance. People keep making fun of the 2A but seem to conveniently forget that damn near half the electorate just ceded the power of arms to the other half out of fear.

[-] Viri4thus@feddit.org -1 points 3 weeks ago

Statistics say no.

At the end of the day it only takes a Luigi.

[-] los_chill@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago

What do you want me to do? I'm fucking out there protesting. Shit I'll be at another rally today. I wish things were different but I'm not a coward and I'm doing what I can. I'm sorry.

So you’re … going to parades.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Just what are you doing, mighty keyboard warrior?

[-] shplane@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Okay, if this was happening in your country, what would you do that would actually stop fascism?

[-] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Oh, don’t worry- we’re all aware it’s coming to our country. And we’re armed.

I love how every time Americans are challenged on their lack of urgency, the response is always to pull a tu quoque, though. Never fails.

[-] shplane@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Your answer is you’re armed? Does that mean you’ll shoot and kill the bad people who rise to power in your country?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Does he think Americans aren't armed?

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So there were some military contracts that were just awarded.

54 missions total:

SpaceX: 28 missions, $5.9 B = $210.7 M per launch

ULA: 19 missions, $5.4 B = $284 M per launch

BO: 7 missions, $2.4 B = $342.9 M per launch

SpaceX did get the most money, but they were also the cheapest provider due to their reusable 1st stages.

Just with those 9 extra launches over ULA SpaceX saves the US government and taxpayers 668 million dollars.

If SpaceX didn't exist, it would have been ~~8~~ 2 billion more but actually worse since the other providers can't supply that much and wouldn't have had as much competitive incentive. Just look at BO the next one which was almost 60m more than ULA. It easily could have ballooned to 4b more adding a 3rd even more expensive option.

Doesn't seem so self dealing to me, they were able to bid lower and win more, and saved, (I'm assuming you given your ~~rage~~ upset) a shit load of money.

This is what SpaceX has been doing for years, well before he got in bed with Trump.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago

the difference is microsoft's products actually worked.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

In a different time, and a different age, somewhere around year 2000. The Phantom Menace, The Matrix, Peter Jackson abusing LOTR fans. PlayStation before it got boring, Web before it got stupid, Sun Microsystems before it got dead, construction and aerospace and software design alike being done by actually competent people.

Microsoft did the barely necessary to be taken seriously.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69451 readers
3643 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS