14

European Union regulators are preparing major penalties against X, including a fine that could exceed $1 billion, according to a New York Times report yesterday.

The European Commission determined last year that Elon Musk's social network violated the Digital Services Act. Regulators are now in the process of determining what punishment to impose.

"The penalties are set to include a fine and demands for product changes," the NYT report said, attributing the information to "four people with knowledge of the plans." The penalty is expected to be issued this summer and would be the first one under the new EU law.

"European authorities have been weighing how large a fine to issue X as they consider the risks of further antagonizing [President] Trump amid wider trans-Atlantic disputes over trade, tariffs and the war in Ukraine," the NYT report said. "The fine could surpass $1 billion, one person said, as regulators seek to make an example of X to deter other companies from violating the law, the Digital Services Act."

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] singletona@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Don't talk about doing the thing and do the thing.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

in a democracy the latter has to be preceded by the former.

[-] singletona@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Forgive me for being jaded and bitter about the opposition party being nothing BUT ineffectual talk.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 months ago
[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

I believe it when they actually do it

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They've fined meta for 800 million in the past.

There's a reason there's so much anti EU sentiment on social media.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_5801

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oh noooooo 1 billion dollars.......such a heavy fine.......

Make it 60 billion.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

This. Fines should be percentage of wealth. Otherwise they're just a sticker price on breaking the law.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

But $60B is more than Musk bought Twitter for, and there's no way it increased enough that $60B would be a reasonable percentage of income in any capacity.

[-] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago

I fully acknowledge your point and don't disagree. On the other hand, who ever said we have to treat Nazis reasonably?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

Democracy and the rule of law. If you pick and choose groups to treat differently, that's authoritarianism. Don't fight authoritarianism with authoritarianism.

[-] IGuessThisIsMyName@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

This would be a fine against X though right rather than Elon himself? Surely the company wouldn't have that kind of cash available and would need to take drastic action to raise that amount.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

rubbing nipples

Oh, gosh! That sounds SO bad! Go on, tell us in explicit detail all the drastic measures that X would face. Tell us all the pain they would endure! Spare no detail.

rubs balls

Yeah.....yeah almost there....

[-] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al -1 points 2 months ago

I don't understand the downvotes for this, this was my thinking too.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Good. Go ahead.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Oh no don’t make papa Elon cry.

[-] Bleys@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Why stop at 1

[-] oxysis@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

So a slap on the wrist? A significant one sure but just ban them if you want to be serious and make an example out of them

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

but just ban them if you want to be serious

But if you ban them you can't continue to fine them....

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

What have they done to earn that fine?

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Preliminary findings from july

  • First, X designs and operates its interface for the “verified accounts” with the “Blue checkmark” in a way that does not correspond to industry practice and deceives users. Since anyone can subscribe to obtain such a “verified” status, it negatively affects users' ability to make free and informed decisions about the authenticity of the accounts and the content they interact with. There is evidence of motivated malicious actors abusing the “verified account” to deceive users.
  • Second, X does not comply with the required transparency on advertising, as it does not provide a searchable and reliable advertisement repository, but instead put in place design features and access barriers that make the repository unfit for its transparency purpose towards users. In particular, the design does not allow for the required supervision and research into emerging risks brought about by the distribution of advertising online.
  • Third, X fails to provide access to its public data to researchers in line with the conditions set out in the DSA. In particular, X prohibits eligible researchers from independently accessing its public data, such as by scraping, as stated in its terms of service. In addition, X's process to grant eligible researchers access to its application programming interface (API) appears to dissuade researchers from carrying out their research projects or leave them with no other choice than to pay disproportionally high fees.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_3761

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

I don't agree with the first one but the other 2 seem reasonable.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

70920 readers
2991 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS