460
submitted 23 hours ago by nzmaa@lemy.lol to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

The opposite of pro life is mandatory abortion for all.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

Wouldn't it require going to full term, and then aborting post delivery?

Or maybe it's forced sterilization for all?

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago

"The changes haven't affected me (yet) so I have no problem with it"

[-] Karjalan@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

"wait, they're cancelling pre orders for the switch 2? REEEEE"

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 19 points 12 hours ago

Anon is an enlightened accelerationist

[-] softcat@lemmy.ca 65 points 15 hours ago

Anon before being sent to pick tendies in the fields at the debtor detention facility

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 156 points 21 hours ago

The problem with NEET-ism is you eventually run out of your parent's money.

[-] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 29 points 21 hours ago

That's where the goverment suppoorted neet's come into the picture.

I know some neet's who get more money from goverment than some people working 60 hour jobs.

[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 36 points 21 hours ago

I don't feel like someone relying on government helps would think some corporate fascist who generally wants to reduce government spendings represents their interest, but then again I don't think there is a logical framework in which we won't conclude that OP is at least a little bit dumb. But what makes me favour the parents supported hypothesis is the "never paid for anything " part.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago

I am from a very poor place in WV where most people are on assistance because there are no jobs.

Trump flags everywhere. Cars driving down the road with no tags or insurance, but Trump stickers all over.

I don’t get it. Well, actually I do.

Religion. The preacher says the gay is bad. Preacher says the trans is bad. Democrats want to extend basic rights to those people and preacher says god don’t like that.

[-] javasux@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago
[-] Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago

Bout tree fiddy

[-] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago

Anywhere from 500 euro up to 1.5k euro ( which is higher than average wage here ).

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 40 points 18 hours ago

How did they never pay for anything? Shoplifting? Are they literally a statue of a Confederate general?

The secret ingredient... is crime

[-] tflyghtz@lemm.ee 60 points 18 hours ago
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 40 minutes ago

Loans

Anon has never had a job, and banks need income to give you a loan.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)
[-] tflyghtz@lemm.ee 15 points 16 hours ago

Welfare hardly finances existance, let alone life. The three I named are more like it

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Why not a bit of all?

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

Good boy points are not subject to tarrifs

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 175 points 22 hours ago

"Fuck you, I never had mine" is definitely one of the positions one could take.

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 4 points 12 hours ago

Except we still live in ‘free’ market vibes based capitalism - where the profits are privatized, and the losses get socialized. If this tariff stupidity goes on, there will be some kind of bailout/grift like there always is. From PPP loans, sweetheart tax breaks, to liquidity bailouts for banks, the Fed will step in and Congress will have to do something to restore market and consumer confidence. Or else we all facetank turbo inflation, job losses, and stagnant wages in a new economic depression.

If these NEETs were old enough to have been alive during the 2008 crash, they spent it playing Modern Warfare 2 and wondering why everyone else had big sad - after all, they still had vidya, porn, and tendies living at home.

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 21 hours ago

Ah.. It's fair? If wealth isn't distributed well, blaming radical ideas will only fuel the fire. Solution is a much deeper one no one wants to invest into.

[-] Franklin@lemmy.ca 25 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I can call it a really stupid take while also acknowledging we need deep systemic change.

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 17 hours ago

I meant it's fair from a common man perspective where the laws might protect you from corporate greed

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago

Burn the world down and build it back fresh and new. It’s a great strategy when you don’t ask who is building it back and what are their goals? Nobody should ever trust Trump or any other billionaire to be that person.

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 14 hours ago

Yes, the right idea with worst case motive

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ashenone@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago

The prices remain the same when you steal everything

[-] uienia@lemmy.world 75 points 22 hours ago

They seem oddly confident in the police state and cultural sharia they voted for will never come for them.

[-] kaaskop@feddit.nl 38 points 21 hours ago

Or they don't care. Don't underestimate how self destructive depression can be.

[-] uienia@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago

Don't blame this on depression. Most depressed people doesn't become fascists. If anything this is their narcissism showing itself.

[-] kaaskop@feddit.nl 9 points 18 hours ago

I dont think al of the people that voted for the annoying orange agree with the fascistic tendencies. It's probably an unhealthy mix of suicidals and depressed people, angry people, fascists, idiots and morons. Neither of these are mutually exclusive of course.

[-] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 15 points 22 hours ago

I never thought leopards would eat my face

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 41 points 22 hours ago

Some men want to see the world burn.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

There really are an unfortunate number of people who want to see the world burn in some fashion. Entertainment, because they can’t stand not poking a bear with a stick, or maybe because they’re a crab in a bucket and are willing to destroy others’ success because they have none of their own.

[-] Tyr_Raidho_Othala@reddthat.com 30 points 22 hours ago
[-] Opisek@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago

You mean you engineer solutions.

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago

As long as the solution is fire

[-] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 21 hours ago

What about explosions? Can we do explosions?

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

That's just fast fire, we can do fast fire!

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 29 points 21 hours ago

The most dangerous people are those with nothing to lose.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 38 minutes ago

The least dangerous people are those with nothing to gain.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 14 points 20 hours ago

I kinda understand their point of view here actually. Wanting to drag everyone down to their level. Burn it all down.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
460 points (97.3% liked)

Greentext

5970 readers
1470 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS