143
Fedora Linux 42 released (fedoramagazine.org)
submitted 18 hours ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

What’s new?

We’ve promoted our KDE Plasma Desktop offering to “Edition” status. The Fedora KDE team has been hard at work making sure bugs get fixed and everything is polished just so. We’re confident that this can stand along our other amazing flagship offerings.

I know the naming is a bit confusing, with GNOME-powered “Workstation” using a generic label while KDE Plasma Desktop has the tech right in the name. We’ll get that figured out eventually. If you don’t know where to start, don’t panic. Pick one and see how it goes. They’re both excellent desktop environments with great upstream communities, and the same Fedora system underneath it all.

We also have a new alternative desktop choice: COSMIC. This is a modern, written-all-in-Rust desktop environment from our friends over at System 76.

Perhaps most excitingly, we have a new installation interface! The previous UI was designed to manage a lot of before-you-even-start configuration choices. Over the past decade, though, we’ve gone to “get the full system installed with no fuss, then set up what you need from a complete environment”. That made the “hub and spoke” model more confusing than helpful. The new UI is streamlined and sleek, just like the Heart of Gold.

Of course, there are other big changes, as well as the usual updates to thousands of packages. See the Fedora Linux 42 Release Notes for all of the details, and don’t miss the “What’s New?” posts here on Fedora Magazine.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] anothermember@feddit.uk 21 points 16 hours ago

Just upgraded. I think I must have been the only person in the world to like the old Fedora installation UI but everyone complained about it so it must be good news that it's gone, as long as I don't hate the new one.

[-] wolf@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago

Count me in! The old installer hat a great UX for people knowing what they wanted to do... There must be dozens of us, dozens! ;-)

[-] notanapple@lemm.ee 5 points 16 hours ago

The old one was too confusing for new users. It wasn't clearly step by step like all the other installers on linux.

[-] anothermember@feddit.uk 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I guess I'm biased because when I first started using Linux some 20 years ago it was considered user friendly for the time. Plus I must have used it hundreds of times since I had a previous job which involved setting up a lot of CentOS servers, which could have blinded me to the problems. Still, I think it's reassuring to do everything from a central overview page for your configuration choices, takes away a bit of self-doubt. I'm not complaining though, as long as the new one does the job.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Not as confusing as Debian though.

[-] dkc@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

I really don’t agree with choosing to release with the UEFI bug they found. They describe it as cosmetic but those entries can last the lifetime of your computer, even if you wipe your hard drive. It’s bound to cause some confusion for years to come for Linux tinkerers.

[-] SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 9 minutes ago

As someone who worked IT, confusion is good for business. I'm only half joking.

fedora says it's a bug in kiwi. I presume they are waiting for upstream to fix this. Parsing this glancingly, found this issue with kiwi and it's beeing fixed. Thank you for the pointer, I'll wait for the next release of Live Images. (Install images are not effected).

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Fedora need to update their homepage, KDE was removed from the spins list and the only obvious download from the landing page is workstation.

Very excited they jumped on the cosmic train though, looking forward to checking that out.

Edit - KDE now has a homepage link, woo!

[-] BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Kde has its own thing now. Lots easier to find than its own spin

https://fedoraproject.org/kde/

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Xfce 4.20

On my way to attempt an upgrade from Xfce + Compiz to Xfce + Wayfire lol

[-] folekaule@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Looking forward to this. I do have a question for the more seasoned people here: I installed Fedora 41 not too long after its release on a new PC, which has been my daily driver every since. Very happy with it, tweaked everything to my liking. However, by mistake I installed Workstation (with Gnome) and then switched to my preferred KDE Plasma as the DE. This has left some corners of my system with the Gnome look and feel, which is fine, but I prefer if it were more consistent.

My question:

  1. Can I/do you recommend that I upgrade Fedora in place? I prefer this if it means I don't have to reinstall everything.
  2. Or do you recommend I do a fresh install anyway for a clean upgrade and at the same time clean up my DE? What is the least disruptive way to do this?
[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

If you do a reinstall, I'd recommend going with a Kinoite install. It's like regular Fedora KDE, except that it avoids this risk of traces of past experiments everywhere.

[-] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 3 points 12 hours ago

It's like regular Fedora KDE, except that it avoids this problem of traces of past experiments everywhere.

Kinoite is much more than that: it is an atomic and immutable spin of Fedora KDE. This has big implications but the gist of it is that:

  1. You can roll back to any previous version if anything breaks

  2. The base system cannot be modified

  3. If you need to install RPM packages, you do that by adding "layers" on top of the base system, and these can be removed if needed to go back to a clean base system

  4. You can switch from one spin to another by "rebasing", but it is recommended that you remove any additional layer first and that you stick to the same desktop environment

[-] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 5 points 16 hours ago

My experience on other distros was that upgrading in place a system that deviated too much from "stock" would wreck the install. I would personally play it safe and backup my home folder and do a fresh install.

Just don't forget to test your backup before formatting your drive!

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Which corners are you referring to, specifically? There are some applications that use GTK components, those are styled seperately in the settings under "GNOME/GTK Application Style". They will never look exactly like a native KDE/QT based application, but you can get them closer.

Likely you had a lot of GTK apps included with Workstation, you could also look into Qt alternatives to replace them - for example Gedit does not conform in KDE, but Kate will.

If you wipe and start fresh with the KDE install, it will prefer Qt applications. So that may be a worth while endeavor. Once you are settled, there is no reason to not upgrade in place. My install has been upgraded in place since fedora 32.

[-] folekaule@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Thank you for replying, very informative. I think I have most of the actions/types I wanted associated with my preferred ones now. The most noticeable one is Firefox when I open downloads from the menu. I'm not sure if Firefox uses xdg or not? I don't mind GTK or Gnome at all, in fact I probably have spent more time on Gnome, but I do like when things are consistent.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

Ah yeah, Firefox is GTK too, and annoyingly hides xdg behind a setting. I apologize in advance as my knowledge here is bit limited, but if firefox is installed with RPM, I think you'll need xdg-desktop-portal-kde installed, then in firefox's about:config set widget.use-xdg-desktop-portal = true. I'm not sure how it works with flatpak though.

But hopefully that helps, best of luck!

[-] folekaule@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That's a great tip! It turns out I must have already tried some of that. I found multiple settings in about:config. Anything with a file picker works (open, save as), but the "open folder" from the Downloads dialog must just not use xdg-open, since none of the settings had an effect on that. It's not the end of the world, but it would be nice to have my Dolphin bookmarks and places.

Edit: Adding this here in case someone in the future finds this searching for the problem. It looks like I'm bitten by the bug described in comment 55 (near the bottom) of this Firefox bug report. TL;DR: it works if I have Dolphin open already, but if not, it starts Nautilus. While this isn't great, at least I have a workaround.

[-] commander@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Upgraded my minipc to it the other day from 40. No problems. Fedora is consistently stable for me

[-] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 16 hours ago

That towel is so funny… I’ve thought about getting a shirt in the past as well but I can’t imagine wearing it outside lol

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
143 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

53128 readers
950 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS