139
submitted 3 days ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 days ago

Sounds like every policy of the war on terror.

[-] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 days ago

How else are we supposed to give nearly half of the discretionary spending to defense contractors? We can't just make a big pile of all the bombs, that would be dangerous. Dropping them on poor people ensures they are only dangerous for a brief amount of time, with minimal risk to the ruling class.

[-] bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net 19 points 3 days ago

When you spend infinite billion dollars through your regional "partners" who knowably executed 9/11 bombing a country for a decade and the rebels STILL take the capitol and you have no real targets because you have forged Dune-style Fremen, while you officially ally with Al Qaeda as the government of Syria a few years after surrendering to the Taliban in Afghanistan... #winning

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

The "anti war" president.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Is this just an excuse to funnel public money into private military contracts?"

"Ye man"

[-] teri@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 days ago

And it costs innocent people their lives or makes it at least very miserable. Yeah, what to spend billions for...

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
139 points (99.3% liked)

World News

35455 readers
704 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS