Can someone help me with this one please? I presume the message is not to side with an aggressor à la the leopards who eat people's faces party. But am I over-analysing the picture? Is liberty trying to constrain/detain security? Can the liberty avatar in this image choose a different avatar for security or is the message that freedom is inherently unsafe and wanting security is folly?
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Benjamin Franklin
There's major "edgy thirteen year old" vibes to this quote.
Trading liberty for security is something everyone who lives in a society does to some extent, and while I'm sure there is more nuance to the full statement, just that one quote gives a very smug vibe.
But it's specifically essential liberty for temporary security. We're not talking about, say, giving up shooting rifles in the air for the safety of the surrounding area, we're talking giving up, for example, basic privacy in return for making sure kids don't accidentally see a tiddie.
I do realise that, but it sounds very silly without the appropriate context.
As the person you're replying to pointed out, the context is in the statement. Essential liberty. Temporary security.
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
