[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 year ago

Why is there always an authoritarian law being proposed every month?

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"This instance has been seized by The US Department of Defence due to threats to national security"

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 year ago

"What's internet? It it like Googlenet but worse?"

-Some kid in the future

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 1 year ago

Piracy? No it's Surprise Ownership!

😎

18
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Okay so for context: I've never really downloaded movies right after release, the movies that I've downloaded were all released at least few months before the time of download, so I don't know how movies releases work.

So when a movie is released, how long does it take for there to be a high-quality pirated version of it? I can't seem to find the movie on an online platform even if I were to pay for it. Are movies exclusive to an actual theater when they first get released? Right now I'm searching for that movie that was just released and all I find is HDCAMs. Does this mean that someone just secretly recorded it in a theater?

Oh btw, the movie I'm talking about is about a scientist that was involved in (at the time) a secret government weapons program during WW2. The movie was released very recently. (Hey, I didn't mentioned the name of the movie, I hope I'm not breaking the rules πŸ˜‰)

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 year ago

Don't mind if I do πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈπŸ΄β€β˜ οΈπŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

164
[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 1 year ago

What? What is pullpush? What does that have to do with lawyers? I'm confused

37

Who determines who owns a domain name? International organization? Do unrecognized countries also get their own top-level domain? If someone or some organization wanted to register a website for highly illegal activities (terrorism, crime organizations, etc) who has the authority to shut them down? Does one government has the authority, or does it require a majority of the countries? What if, say, North Korea hosted a website advocating terrorism? Who can take that down?

67
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/reddit@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/930912

This is the user's 3rd post. Let's see how long before that is also taken down! 🀣

Screenshot:

Long-screenshot:

Edit: Seems like Lemmy just compresses long-screenshots, so here's imgur link:

https://i.imgur.com/3hrxeXt.jpg

Original post (this is the 3rd post, it was too late for me to see the other 2 posts):

https://old.reddit.com/r/place/comments/155emuz/so_i_cant_even_post_about_the_abuse_going_on_here/

Archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230721110216/https://old.reddit.com/r/place/comments/155emuz/so_i_cant_even_post_about_the_abuse_going_on_here/

159
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/snoocalypse@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/930912

This is the user's 3rd post. Let's see how long before that is also taken down! 🀣

Screenshot:

Long-screenshot:

Edit: Seems like Lemmy just compresses long-screenshots, so here's imgur link:

https://i.imgur.com/3hrxeXt.jpg

Original post (this is the 3rd post, it was too late for me to see the other 2 posts):

https://old.reddit.com/r/place/comments/155emuz/so_i_cant_even_post_about_the_abuse_going_on_here/

Archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230721110216/https://old.reddit.com/r/place/comments/155emuz/so_i_cant_even_post_about_the_abuse_going_on_here/

31
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

I mean, a state that is forseeing a election which an opponent party will likely win, could just pass a law before the election that says "The state legislature shall have the sole authority of appointing electors to the electoral college for elections of president and vice president" and if they have an already gerrymandered state legislature, they could cling to power with like 40%, or maybe even less, of the votes and have a trifecta in the state, electoral votes are practically permanently voting for the party. They could even change how governors are selected by making them to also be appointed by legislature, further solidifying their power.

Why haven't some states just gone full authoritarian? I mean, the federal government couldn't do anything about such states if this were to happen, due to federalism.

31

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/917626

Original Post: https://old.reddit.com/r/place/comments/1553p2x/official_rplace_canvas_timelapse_day_1/

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20230721003357/https://old.reddit.com/r/place/comments/1553p2x/official_rplace_canvas_timelapse_day_1/

Video doesn't play for me for some reason, so I had to download it myself and reupload to archive.org

Video: https://archive.org/details/reddoom

Datahoarders, please save and share. This will be the legacy of how a platform got itself killed, then shot itself again to make sure it's dead.

1

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/917626

Original Post: https://old.reddit.com/r/place/comments/1553p2x/official_rplace_canvas_timelapse_day_1/

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20230721003357/https://old.reddit.com/r/place/comments/1553p2x/official_rplace_canvas_timelapse_day_1/

Video doesn't play for me for some reason, so I had to download it myself and reupload to archive.org

Video: https://archive.org/details/reddoom

Datahoarders, please save and share. This will be the legacy of how a platform got itself killed, then shot itself again to make sure it's dead.

7
Deleted (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Deleted

498
[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 year ago

Netflix will be losing to a competitor with an ad-free tier that costs $0.00

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 year ago

Can I offer you a free tier in these trying times?

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

60

I mean, people use dash-cams protect themselves in case of a car crash, so do you think people in the future would also use body-cams protect themselves in case of being involved in a fight?

11
Deleted (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Deleted

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 1 year ago

Brave sucks. Firefox + uBlock Origin is superior.

Yes I'm a Firefox Supremacist.

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 81 points 1 year ago

How about donating to smaller instances so we aren't one government raid away from collapsing.

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί

001100010010

joined 1 year ago