Honestly same thing happens when we talk about men.
Tons of women coming up, saying "women have it worse" and attempting to minimize the importance if men's issues.
Let's just listen to both sides for once, and make everyone heard. When everyone is given a platform to speak, there's no need to interrupt each other.
The scariest part is that real world is, in fact, a hardcore free-for-all PvP realm.
I'm not talking competition or something. A random person can absolutely come to you at any time, stab or shoot you and you'll be dead. Forever. No respawns.
It's only because people don't really like being murdered that led them to make and enforce rules on what violence is legitimate that curbed the violence. But even still, anytime, anywhere, by anyone, you can absolutely be killed. And if one day something breaks in the chain that makes police work, we're super screwed.
I feel.like we generally give women a pass on A LOT of weird behaviors about children.
That does include elevated attention to the genital area (seriously, why? Leave our genitals alone ffs), borderline fetishizing breastfeeding, and also a lot of other stuff.
Like, for example, I had several women independently telling me how baby feces smell nice and milky. Like, what the hell and why do y'all feel it's appropriate for a casual conversation???
Or that they love to smell baby feet. Huh? Funny thing I first got those stories after seeing a TV ad (was a while ago) with a woman burying her face in baby feet.
I can only assume this is either a result of hormonal shifts throughout pregnancy, or that there's plenty more female pedophiles than we knew.
So what they're essentially said is that they're gonna follow the rules for now to not be insta-banned, but will consider how to act next given the time they have received.
Which is why it's important to tell Mozilla it really is a bad choice to follow Russian censors.
Kaspersky actually has a good track record of NOT being anything malicious (Except for old times when it seemed to flag pirate software quite often).
However, if the tool is closed-source, this is naturally against Linux ethos and is generally something to avoid, given extensive permissions.
It's like me figuring out after 23 years that most people don't sneeze looking at the sun
With authors often paying for open access publications literally out of their very own money, not just grants.
Let me rephrase it.
54% of young Americans struggle to buy food.
The backend is proprietary. Avoid.
All jokes aside, using Linux really does bring some peace of mind when it comes to malware.
While Linux malware certainly exists, it's nowhere near as prevalent as Windows one, so that's one less headache to give serious consideration to.
Ironically, even Microsoft uses Linux in its Azure datacenters, iirc