[-] Allero@lemmy.today 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Except this time the Unix-like took 100% of the market

Was too clear this thing is just better

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 34 points 3 weeks ago

Me: unsubbing every single politics community

Showerthoughts:

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 38 points 3 weeks ago

We often talk about toxic newbies, but sometimes we don't pay enough attention to how we ourselves changed as a result. Make them feel welcome, and see how much Lemmy changes back.

If you (yes, you, reader) are new to Lemmy, have my wholehearted "Welcome"! Hugs on demand, cookies right there, make yourself comfy :)

Avoid politics-oriented communities unless toxicity is your thing. Start with any instance (most likely you chose lemmy.world as your starting point?), but explore others and what they have to offer. You can even be on several of them if that's your thing! Enjoy!

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now what the actual fuck

Linus gives it a full green light and refers to negative reactions as Russian bot attacks

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linus-Torvalds-Russian-Devs

1000054130

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Answering questions in the article:

But is it actually possible? Yes. It's not complicated by modern space industry standards.

Is it smart to do? Absolutely not, it is insanely wasteful and unpractical. Electric light exists, just sayin'. Also, you either need to switch between satellites in a swarm, which will suddenly change the angles of light, or you have to put satellites onto geostationary orbit, which is even more wasteful.

And would it really look exactly as portrayed in the video? No. It is known they did not use satellites for it, most likely it was a drone. Light will come from a much greater distance and will also dissipate more - harassing your surroundings, that is.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 35 points 4 months ago

Patriotism also sucks, because it implements a bias that can then be exploited, and brings very little to the table.

State-level patriotism also makes you complicit in the division of people by countries and nations, as opposed to classes and other valid groups of people.

And there is no valid reason to have some special relation to your country. It is natural to feel ties with the place you were born or the place you spent a lot of time in, this is human psychology, but your country is nothing but a piece of land that was marked by somebody as belonging to some virtual entity.

We should ditch state-level patriotism as a concept and treat local-level patriotism as a natural bias. We should strive to help people of all places and origins, and come together as one.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 34 points 6 months ago

Pretty sure zoomers just troll boomers who genuinely think the new generation is stupid

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 34 points 7 months ago

One is bad in one way and the other is bad in the opposite way.

Neutralize!

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 37 points 7 months ago

So, apparently the only porn allowed is featuring minors?

How the hell can they justify this

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 37 points 7 months ago

UK legislators have a long history of taking actions not informed by science or reason but rather the popular, often hysteric, opinion.

This case is yet another attempt at tightening screws where they shouldn't be.

AI imagery was produced by Stable Diffusion, the model that, for all we know, did not take real CSAM as inputs and caused no harm to actual children. At the same time, such images are important at discouraging the consumption of real CSAM, with very real children being traumatized.

By banning AI imagery production using safe models, legislators leave no legal way for pedophiles to get something by the harmless means, directing many to the harmful ways as equally illegal, while also prosecuting those who did no harm.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 35 points 7 months ago

The memo looks like it comes straight out of dystopian novel

How did we get here

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 40 points 9 months ago

The conclusion doesn't follow the study.

Threatening messages decrease piracy by women by over 50%, while increasing piracy by men by 18%.

So, unless there are three times as many male pirates as female, those messages are effective at reducing piracy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Allero

joined 11 months ago