That's not what this article says. Earliest application was March 5, 2024.

Palworld was released on Jan 18th, 2024, a month and a half beforehand.

Basically, he's a CEO and therefore thinks every dollar on earth is his by right. I think the best summary is that he's using his competing positions at the non-profit foundation to benefit his for-profit company.

Noting that the only bounties were from some of the many 3rd party companies using Zendesk. Zendesk themselves did NOTHING.

As a commentor there said: "The best way to incentivize malicious activity is not to reward philanthropic behaviour. The next exploit for ZenDesk will be sold directly to the darkweb after having read this."

Am I the only one who feels like this is an AI generated article incorrectly summarizing the actual info?

Using performance enhancing drugs can result in a lifetime ban from the Olympics, with Wikipedia saying it's an "integrity" issue. Aren't we glad that raping a literal child isn't an integrity issue?

The news where I live often calls Olympic winners "sports heroes", I think this person should never be allowed anywhere near an event that might make people label them a hero.

So, a corporation fucked a guy over, and when he retaliated using the same method they fucked him over with, he gets punished by the law while nothing happens to them?

Not saying he was right to do what he did but I understand why he'd feel aggrieved by them. And fuck the "rule of law" that so blatantly supports corporations over people.

For anyone wondering, yes the plane is a Boeing 787-9...

Having not yet read the article, if the species in question aren't Bezos, Musk, Gates et al, then the report writers have missed the mark.

Every person in a leadership role at that hospital should do time for this. It's a disgrace.

Is this saying that Google will get every device to log every Bluetooth device it detects, just in case one of them is then reported as missing? Like, what in the holy overreach stalker BS is this?

From the headline I was hoping some execs fell on their sword but nope. Workers get the shaft and higher-ups keep their job to look after the rest of the business.

In the article they proudly report that less experienced devs are "getting much better productivity gains" (by accepting more copilot suggestions).

As a natural-born cynic, I instead would say that maybe: "less experienced devs lack the experience to know why some copilot suggestions have unintended consequences / are a bad design choice".