Maybe because no rafael never fell. Pakistan has shown no viable proof for it. We may be buying it becuase they were effective?
Yeah, these guys are for real annoying. These guys don't even have a real opinion on the topic, all they have is just a single brain cell that too on ventilator.
Thanks for pointing this guy out brother.
Ohh, never thought will find you again after shutted your illogical mouth on news@lemmy.world.
I almost feel like you are targeting me because of whatever type of radical you are, but dude, I will repeat myself again as I did previously, I am Pro-India, not Pro- a specific person or party.
Yes, I may have my own political view like you have but unlike you I know tolerance, I accept and condemn the mistakes committed by all even if done by the Party I feel closer to and I will happily praise the other party if they something good. It is not about party, it is about work. If you try to find just like the type of screen zombie you appear to be, I have criticised the current party and goverenment as well on things I find are wrong. Again you are quoting Wikipedia which is many times blamed for biasness and cannot be termed as a proof, to which you agreed previously.
Secondly, lets talk about the defnition of Hindu. Hindu as coined means all the people who live on the south of Indus River (Sindhu river as indigenously called, persians and greek found it difficult to pronounce 'S', so they replaced it with H, Hindu River) and in the north of Indian Ocean are called Hindus. It was purely a used for people of any religion. It was a cultural and geographical term, not religious one. The term you seem to be talking about is Sanatan, which is the true religous term. The Hindutva Ideology advocates for recognising the common culture we have, no matter religion. That is why your so called RSS has Muslim Rashtriya Manch for muslims and even platforms for Christians and Sikhs. Secularism is in our soul, you don't have to preach about it. Many European countries with a stigma of natually being 'Secular' in their constitution call themselves 'Christian'. I am not at all advocating for a party of ideology but just explaining my side. The motive of this community is India Centric, not anything else.
Yes, I can have my political preferences and it is my right, but I am not blocking you from having yours, so you should not target me for mine. I have many friends who don't agree with me, not just on Lemmy but also on real life, but we are still friends, because in the end we have the same goal, That is Development.
Your statements only tell me how much of lack of knowledge you have. You say muslims are being lynched by a specific party and people, the RSS (The organisation I think you are referring to) has a Muslim wing Muslim Rashtriya Manch(MRM), I have many muslim friends as well who support the ruling party currently, so my opinion is pretty much formed from them as well. The way you talk however makes me feel you support a specific agenda of yours and want to make me agree to it as well, which I will not, cuz my thoughts are of my own.
I didn't even mention SIR, but yeah, I will accept, illegal immigrants actually have more and better fool-proof documents than the original citizens because they know what they are doing requires it. I don't know in detail about SIR, like what documents are required for verification, so I will not speak on it currently, but I will definitely do sme research on it.
The aim of your so called refashioning is not to solve climate change, because with just one change, such big of a problem cannot be solved, the aim is systemic efficiency, atleast it shuld be able to achieve as much as it potentially can. Each scheme and system should contribute maximum to its goal.
This system I have introduced has this sole aim, and as a by-product, it will also reduce pollution. That is the real case.
Do comment only if you have real opinions or suggestions, which seems to be missing in your case.
Still thanks for your views
You have a point, especially about the research one but this is also true that goverenment cannot spend it's money, and focus on everything and Energy sector is a sector I would really say needs a good balance between Public and Private shareholding. in that sense, I would say it's an okayish move.
Still the new ideas always come from private corporations, yes the goverenment support is needed in capital and other things but private companies do all other things. I still say in a sensetive sector like this one, a Public Private Partnership (PPP) model should be more promoted so that neither goverenment nor Private corporations have monopoly over this sector.
You have got a point, but we cannot just stick to mediocre goverenment owned model, can we? Actually here in India, goverenment services are very bad while Private sector provides top notch quality almost in all sectors. The hinger for profit that drives the private companies is also the reason why many of the major innovations are done by them.
So, to be honest brother, I do feel it can do good but as I mentioned, it must be controlled, A National Nuclear Code should be introduced regarding rules and regulations.
Btw, if you like our content please join our community.
I am not saying that there was no airframe loss, but the sheer numbers advocated are fake. wheater you accept it or not, Rafael is the best in its class for a 4.5 gen fighter. The main goal of OP Sindoor was to attack and destroy Pakistani terrorist camps and military outposts which was achieved, in a conflict you cannot expect no loss, but the thing that matters is that wheather you achieved your target or not. Multipl Pak airbases were targeted and many grounded fighter jets were destroyed as well by India, I have shown multiple proves about that on this community and they are actually verified IAF sources but the most of the clips shown by PAF are highly questionable. So the losses were on both the sides, but the difference was, India was able to achieve its targets.