The "protect the children" group, pro doing nothing to stop school shootings, wants kids to watch people be murdered by the state, doesn't want to let schools feed kids or uplift impoverished families, leading to starving/malnourished children...

But God forbid someone who "looks funny" (to them) wants to read them a kids book.

I know it's a joke, and I'm super excited pro choice... But even knowing they're dog/elephant their comment still works (other than the "humans" clarifier) as they can make independent thoughts and love their lives.

It's about conforming to what I personally believe

I haven't played since ORAS, but I think they'll always have those tutorials cause they're targeted at kids. Like I was playing the original at 10 and now my kids starting to get into Pokémon at 6.

I feel like they should allow an "adult" version though. Like no hand holding and harder.

It's wild how little the most financially successful franchise of all time has innovated.

I guess, tbf, he has had some consequences. Most people know about it and despise him, the queen pretty much disinhereted him, and history will not be kind... But it's still very bourgeoisie "consequences" .

Mofo should be in jail, but fat chance of that happening

To add extra weight to this comment. It is a common tactic to attempt to "bounce" a batter out, which basically means bowling with enough speed at such a short length that it comes towards the body, and especially, the head. If a batter is unprepared, it usually requires getting out of the way because trying to play a shot is likely to end up with you getting out or struck by the ball.

The ball is much harder and denser than a baseball and even a famous up and coming professional, international, batter died when he failed to get out of the way and was struck in the head.

Basically, there is a very real safety concern for players when it comes to something like this.

I guess in terms of an actual weightless object... Not... But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that's half a weight unit, take two away, that's zero weight units.

I'm pretty sure they get more money from people freely giving them data using a lot of their services (maps, search) than they'd get if they gatekept searching with a, subscription that people opted out of.

You've got it backwards. If it wasn't for the government, regulations and anti monopoly laws there wouldn't be any new companies, it'd just be one major Corp for each sector.

They still don't even go far enough tbh.

Went from confidently incorrect to wanting to find out the answer pretty quick, which is progress? I guess?

Mmm, pan seared grandma

I yin the 200k is just Aussie subscribers though? Or are you saying they also had 6 million new aussie ones?

The article isn't 100% clear, but it says "get lost 200k". They the next sentence "the first time they've lost aussie subscribers"