I share your sentiment but I think they will attempt to out cunt each other on being vile, petty children. The will try to be as punitive as possible with policy and neglectful in their duties to facilitate the mechanisms of functional government. And, yes maybe not completely because they are probably not even competent enough to do that.

I'm sorry my American friends but you're in for some catastrophic shitfuckery.

Whilst I respect her view on the situation in Gaza, is this not cutting your nose off to spite your face? There will be NO ability to influence a Trump and more broadly Republican government unlike a Democrat one. In fact under Trump you will see more overt support for Israel and even worse a contraction of US involvement in the situation to temper aggression. Also, given Trump's war like provaclivity in the past, with authorising a strike in Iran, it is likely going increase the likelihood of escalation and a more widespread conflict.

He not anxious about the election, it's the fact he goes to jail for all of his evil shitfuckery if he loses. No amount of microphone fellatio will alay his worry about atoning for his disgusting existence.

So what you're saying is that they (the city) treated it as a medical problem and not a law enforcement problem. Now you're seeing fewer deaths and better outcomes for addicts who clearly need help. All they need to do now is work on the mental health issues to treat homelessness and addiction and then gain societal profit. It's like there is a kinda of logic to treating people with empathy and respect results in better outcomes...

What source can you cite that shows that children in poverty primarily source their calories from soft drinks/soda and now will be at greater risk of nutritional deficit specifically as a result of this tax?

Food poverty is clearly related to cost of living issues and social inequity all greatly exacerbated by Brexit, not a tax on sugar.

This site provides data and resources for more information.

https://foodfoundation.org.uk

You did a very excellent thing looking out for this doglet. As to the yelling at the owners; if it's hyperbole then all's well. If in fact you did yell at them, then that can foster resentment that can often be deflected to other things like said woofer. If these owners are recalcitrant in looking after this animal, then offer to take her off their hands and place her in a more loving environment. Once she is secure, persue her former owners and dissembowel them with a cement trowel and wear their entrails like Mardi gras bling. Have a wonderful day and peace be with you.

In what fucking universe is putting secure military communications under the control of a private entity a good idea?

"Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." ― Denis Diderot

The rest of the world is both scared and resentful that we have to give a fuck about American politics.

I say that respectfully of our American brothers and sisters who are no doubt anxious as well.

Tangentially related question: What is this American aversion to using the word "hell"?

Fill with mercury. The rocks will float to the top then you can just pick them up.

Cite sources please.

The only hypothesis I think works is he is an electoral liability. Keeping him there provides ammunition during the election and means the GOP can't get a better candidate. The guy is a massive fucknuckle.