11
submitted 1 month ago by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

We’ve all run into the same wall: a quest breaks, an NPC won’t move, a trigger doesn’t fire, or a bug locks you out of progress. On PC, you fix it in seconds with a console command or a small mod. On consoles, you’re stuck. Reload, restart, pray.

But here’s the thing nobody talks about: Consoles could support console commands and mods without disabling achievements.
There’s nothing magical about PCs that makes this possible. The engines are the same. The tools exist. The hardware can handle it. The only thing stopping it is platform policy.

Right now, consoles treat user tools like forbidden magic. Mods disable achievements. Console commands are locked away. Players are forced to choose between fixing a bug or keeping their progress “legitimate,” even in single‑player games.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

There are obvious solutions:

Allow console commands that don’t affect progression

Allow curated/sandboxed mods without disabling achievements

Flag saves as “modified” without punishing the player

Provide an opt‑in “unsupported mode” for full tools

Let players fix bugs in their own games

PC players have had this balance for decades. Consoles could too — if platform holders stopped treating user control as a threat instead of a feature.

This isn’t about cheating. It’s about player agency, game preservation, and not losing hours of progress because a quest marker decided to take a vacation.

If consoles can run the games, they can run the tools that keep those games playable. It’s time to stop pretending these limitations are technical. They’re not.

[-] Coleman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Definitely an age thing, I remember a time video games didn't have achievements, you played the game 'cause you liked the game, game companies kept track by virtue of their sails, now these days it's how long a player plays, what achievements have been unlocked etc. I keep thinking that it's OCD, the permanence of the thing, something I can't change, but maybe you're right, maybe it's old age.

[-] Coleman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not asking to get rid of achievements, I'm asking for a compromise, I'm just questioning the importance of achievements, there are devices and or cheats to unlock all achievements and those who use mods and don't care for what achievements they have, that's not reliable developer data. Like my post states I see many sides of this discussion, pro achievements, neutral to achievements, and I guess in my case questioning of achievements. One's either pro or neutral two game achievements, in truth I have yet to hear anyone who wants achievements GONE, or at the very least an option to clear or delete one's achievement history, it's the permanency of the thing for me you see.

7
submitted 1 month ago by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

Playing Fallout 4 Anniversary Edition on PC and I hit one of those classic “Bugthesda” moments: last time this level crashed to desktop with no warning, and today my screen randomly auto‑adjusted mid‑game and threw my aim and immersion completely off.

I did the usual ritual: check for updates → Microsoft Store updates → verify game files → repair the library. You know the drill.

But honestly, that’s not the part that’s really stuck in my head.

What’s been gnawing at me is this: in 2026, are achievements still relevant in the way platforms treat them—especially when mods disable them anyway?

A few things bother me:

Mods disable achievements (even on consoles now in some cases), so for a lot of players they’re already meaningless mechanically.

There’s no way to opt out. If I don’t want a permanent public record of what I did or didn’t do in a game, tough luck.

Even if I uninstall or refund a game, the partial achievement list just sits there on my profile forever like a half‑finished diary I never agreed to publish.

What I wish existed is something like:

a “no achievements” mode where I can play purely for the experience, and my achievement list just shows as “inaccessible/opted out” to others

or at least the ability to hide or erase achievements for specific games if I decide I don’t want that history attached to me anymore

I’m not pretending I can change the minds of big companies who still design like it’s 2005, but I am genuinely curious what different types of players think:

Achievement hunters: Do you care if others can opt out, or does that not affect you at all?

Mod users (PC and console): Since mods often disable achievements, do they still matter to you in any way?

Everyone else: Do you ever think about the permanence of your achievement history, or is it just background noise?

Is it time for platforms to give us a real opt‑out or ephemeral play option, or am I overthinking something that most people are fine with?

1
submitted 2 months ago by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/reddit@lemmy.world

Reddit has quietly removed nearly all avenues for users to provide direct feedback to the platform. Traditional support channels, appeals, and human contact points have been replaced with automated systems, and even r/RedditFeedback is no longer monitored by Reddit staff. This shift reflects a broader trend in large platforms moving toward automation over user communication, raising concerns about transparency, accountability, and long‑term community trust.

-13
(deleted) (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

Fallout 4's Anniversary Edition can no longer do mods, nor can I access the free creations I spent extra on and on top of everything my game crashed, so I did the obvious checked for updates, Disk Cleanup, Defragment and Optimize Drives, went to Nvidia settings to ensure everything there is up to date and everything was good. The case and point lies with the mods F4SE in particular, so I went to https://github.com/ianpatt/f4se Only to later realize they deal with bug fixes not updates! Thank you very much MC I will not forget that embarrassment, If only closed issues could be deleted. Sorry about the poor image resolution, I've been having an issue with that and don't know how to fix it, It pops in and out every now and then clear to blurry. FYI I have tried twice to downgrade Fallout 4 but I just can't seem to do it right, no I rely on the modding community now, I have little choice.

[-] Coleman@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

AI chat MC (Microsoft Copilot) guided me here, I have many dreams for online accounts alternative paths no longer needing usernames so a person can leave delete their account and someday return using their own name if they want as my Lemmy profile states I fight for digital rights, the permanence of accounts feels unnecessary uncomfortable. Lemmy itself needs a better way to delete unnecessary posts and comments but you're right it's a far better leap from Reddit strict dictatorial moderations, regret not using MC in that post perhaps it would have simply gotten rejected and not gotten me banned and muted, needless to say the first place MC requested I send it, did not like me, alas I cannot delete my mistakes on Lemmy, yet at least I am not silenced, so far.

4
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/reddit@lemmy.world

I’m honestly confused about what Reddit is doing with their AI filters now. I tried posting in r/help a while back because I needed actual help, and the post got removed instantly. The mod message said something about “AI‑generated content,” even though I wrote it myself.

So I rewrote it in my own words, shorter, more casual. Removed again.

Tried one more time. That time I got banned and muted from the subreddit. No human review, no appeal, nothing. Just “you’re banned.”

The rules didn’t say anything about AI. I wasn’t breaking any rule. I wasn’t spamming. I wasn’t being rude. I literally just wanted help. And now I’m permanently banned from the one place that’s supposed to help people.

Has anyone else had Reddit’s AI moderation just nuke everything you write, even when it’s your own words? Is this normal now?

1
submitted 2 months ago by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

Most major platforms still rely on a very old identity model: one username, tied to one email, tied to one permanent account. Once something goes wrong — lost email, deleted account, forgotten recovery info — the identity is gone forever, even if the user wants to return.

Examples many people run into:

Deleted Reddit accounts permanently lock the username, even if the user returns years later.

Facebook accounts can’t be recreated once deleted, and recovery depends entirely on old email/phone access.

Steam accounts are tied to payment methods or emails people may no longer have.

Many services keep usernames in a permanent record even after deletion.

This creates a strange kind of digital permanence: you can delete an account, but you can’t delete the identity attached to it.

So I’m wondering:

Could online identity work without permanent usernames at all?

Could identity be modular or replaceable instead of tied to a single handle?

Would hardware keys, biometrics, or wallet‑stored codes solve the “lost email = lost account forever” problem?

Why do so many platforms treat usernames as permanent even after deletion?

Is this a technical limitation, a policy choice, or just legacy design?

Could federated systems eventually support more flexible identity models?

I’m curious how others think online identity should work, especially in a world where people change emails, lose access, or want to return to a platform without being locked out of their own name forever.

[-] Coleman@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I've been trying to contact the admin, but no luck, all sources point to Lemmy.World, but unfortunately, I've hit a snag, the only way for me to delete the image from gallery, is to delete the URL entirely :( and in order to delete the URL, I'll need to find the person who created it! Honestly Perchance needs to change.

[-] Coleman@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, repeatedly, in fact I'm still posting. You would think deleting an image from gallery would be easy, but no, it's part of the URL itself. So the only way to undo my mistake is to undo the whole URL. If I could change one thing about perchance it would be the option to remove. images from gallery or, you know, allow those who login to post to the gallery.

3
Permanently Deleted (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/webdev@programming.dev

Permanently Deleted

-1
submitted 11 months ago by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
-10
(deleted) (perchance.org)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Coleman@lemmy.world to c/experienced_devs@programming.dev

Permanently Deleted

Coleman

joined 11 months ago