[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I hear you. The saliva test isn't perfect, but it's something.

Where I live only a doctor is allowed to draw and test your blood, which is tough to do at the side of the road during a traffic stop. They need a lab for that. So a saliva test is much more viable in that context.

[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No, but not every car has a breathalyzer. Only repeat offenders get one of those. So the point still stands imo. Maybe someday the saliva test can be hooked up to the ignition.

[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

12 to 24h seems good (maybe even too long imho) in the context of driving a car.

[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You can easily test if they're in someone's system with a saliva test, so your argument doesn't make any sense.

[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

We have street lights on every highway and almost every public road.

[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Scale is not the only difference. The companies who do this end up making money with something trained on someone's else's work. If a regular Joe Shmoe pirates a book, they don't earn anything with it.

[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Wtf, clenched my ass like crazy watching this

[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Por que no les dos?

[-] CoolCat@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Wow, you're so special

CoolCat

joined 10 months ago