[-] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That's just Alberta....

How can it be trained to produce something without human input.

To verify it's models are indeed correct, some human has to sit and view it.

Will that be you?

That's not how these image generators work.

How would it know what an age appropriate penis looks like with our, you know, seeing one.

The only way to generate something like that is to teach it something like that from real images.

[-] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Is that why The UN

Is also demanding the same thing?

Do you really see the Palestinians being free? As they're actively killed?

As for specific policies, how about removing any mention or distinction between any religion in the region.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_freedom_of_movement

How about freedom of movement to start?

You want to know what would stop that kind of thinking?

Ending apartheid

You say this like pilots, young and old, haven't been using ANC headphones for decades safely at this point.

And no, just because someone says something could be a risk, doesn't mean we all respond. I mean that's literally the lesson we learned from the vacines cause autism. What are you even talking about it's okay to just wildly speculate.

And yet that didn't stop the ACTUAL harm it caused.

You are right there's never been any credible evidence.

But I wasn't claiming that.

I was claiming it was irresponsible to report on such an early finding in the media without proper verification and actual conclusive studies.

Almost like the BBC article here in question.

[-] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Because that worked so well for ~~Dr.~~ Wakefield

We also had an expert who started the vacines cause autism trying to peddle a new replacement for the MMR vaccine. (This is my opinion based on the research done Here )Just because "an expert" says something, doesn't mean it's true. And blindly listening to them can cause harm as well.

This is a fallacy called Argument of authority

No, it's completely irresponsible to say something not peer reviewed and actually studied.

Sure, but it's still pretty irresponsible of the BBC to publish what is effectively educated guesses as something to be concerned about.

This belongs in an academic article. Not a news one.

view more: next ›

DoPeopleLookHere

joined 4 weeks ago