And on that day children, not a single citation was given.
For any other dsylexics like me out there. The complaint is using an adjective as a prefix.
I almost had a "am I too old" moment.
Totally agree OP.
Little bit more.
Someone made 3 servers, then a bunch of accounts on those servers, then used all of those accounts to downvote.
Allegedly because I ain't got the time to manually verify that myself.
Sure, but you still shouldn't be selling the technology as actually working, instead of developing.
Amazon bought whole foods a while back. What would have stopped them from just collecting the data in their own stores, and then developed the tech?
Hint: shareholder value.
You still haven't answered, why save a private business? Why bail out whatever international private equity by buying Tim's from them? Why would that every be worth tax payer money?
but what good is that if AI can do it anyway?
It can't. It just fucking can't. We're all pretending it does, but it fundamentally can't.
Creative thinking is still a long way beyond reasoning as well. We're not close yet.
Because it test what you actually retained, not what you can convince an AI to tell you.
Decompiling doesn't give you the code like you'd expect.
It gives you the instructions the code generates.
There's a Lego island decomp documentary on YouTube that is recomend for more details.
But the actual source code used doesn't get piped out. Instead you get the machine instructions and you make code that generates the same instructions.
Meaning your still writing the game yourself, meaning you own the copyright
They had 4 fucking years to do something.
Look where that got us...
I'm not American, but as a Canadian even I have my pitchfork and cocktail ready.
That's still missing the point of he's gonna do it anyways....
How does qualifying a threat make it better?
view more: next ›
DoPeopleLookHere
joined 1 year ago
The implication that the reviewer thinks they're stupid and need to read more papers and try again.
Not that they're mis-citing works.