[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

We had 3 scratch-happy cats and quelled them with scratching posts. No declawing needed.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago

And anti-vax idiocy flourishes because communities didn't make life hell for them.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Given their birth rate they'd be lucky to have even Sato's around by the 26th century.

34
submitted 8 months ago by GhostFence@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world

It's from Netflix's "Damsel". That's all I'm gonna say. Watch it, IDGAF what you think of the movie, 11 is hardcore af. And if you saw the movie... can you handle it? I know at my age I couldn't anymore.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

The right isn't a frog in a boiling pot. It's reaching its final form as dictated by the Southern Strategy.

855
10

I just finished watching the depressing ending of Risen 2021 and the instant the end credits started I was hit with a realization - wasn't this what happened during the Great Oxygen Catastrophe? Anaerobic life existed on this planet for ~1.5 billion years before cyanobacteria came along. It wasn't alien life that did it but doesn't make much difference to me. I mean I appreciate (most of) my fellow humans but we're here because some microbes decided to terraform the planet, heedless of the planet-wide ecosystem they were destroying or the life that depended on it.

Anaerobic bacteria aren't humans and I'm sure they didn't have armies or scientists to realize they were doomed but at the bottom of it, life is life and extinction is extinction.

That crappy movie sure got me to thinking. To borrow a concept from Mark Twain, our actual history rhymes with this movie. Anyone else notice the parallels?

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Finally, a resistance is starting to wake up in this country. I've been left with this belief that the lawless vigilante fascists can do whatever they want and the populace is just too scared to try to stop them.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

"Housing addiction: the next drug war." - Republicans/Capitalists

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Good. Hope all these office mandating companies go out of business. No more of people being forced into these mandatory COVID infection labs just to make a living.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Behold the corporate state.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

Tact does matter. That is why I say "seeking cis man/woman" is better than "no trans man/woman". "No black people" is bad, "prefer SWM/SWF" is better and acceptable IMO (disclaimer: I'm black), "looking for athletic man/woman" is better than "no fat people", etc., just my opinion.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Many of your points here are spot on. There's not a lot of trans people as a percentage of the populace. Maybe like 2-3% tops, so you're right, you're not going to run into hordes of trans people while swiping. And many of those do NOT want to hide who they are short term and are loathe to just up and hide it from a date long term. Let's make it clear there's no movement to trick people into dating trans people, to *further *derail any right wingers reading this to get their rageohol fix.

You are also right about the etiquette of it all. Tact and timing are important. "Before you go any further I only date cis people" is idiocy. But the fact is a lot of people do not want to date trans people and that's their right. We have to come to a happy medium where we respect that but (to address your legit and underlying concern) don't also let this "trans people are everywhere looking to trick us into dating them OMFG RUNNNNN!!" hysteria genie out of the bottle. I am definitely NOT here to foment that.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

That is a holdover from when I thought cis was an acornym. Sorry!

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago

Thank you for your response. I feel I must repeat in case it is ambiguous: I am absolutely against any form of trans shaming whatsoever. If you want to date a trans person, you should be 100% free to do so without negative social consequence.

363

There's this rising narrative going around that if you ask specifically for a CIS partner, you're a transphobe. That could be true for some people but it's not fundamentally related to bigotry. Moreover, this narrative, the "if you only want a CIS mate then that is prejudice" is trampling on one of the most important rights a person can have: the right to choose who they want to get intimate with.

First of all, transmen are in fact men and transwomen are in fact women. Let's get that out of the way. This isn't a foot in the door for "trans this really isn't that" narratives. What this is about it is the freedom to choose who you want to be intimate with. That right is sancrosanct, it is absolutely inviolable.

And yes, there's plenty of issues that make transgender dating a special issue. If someone reveals their TG status they can be open to hate crimes and even deadly violence. However all marginalized groups are special in their own way. As a black man I don't think it's racist if a woman says she doesn't want to date a black man. I face oppression, too. My class is special in its own way. One group isn't more special than the other. None of us have the right to force ourselves upon those who don't want to be intimate with us, even by omitting who we really are.

Really, if you have to deceive or hide who you are in order to date someone, do you really want to date them? I wouldn't. That's not fair to you and you're denying them their right to choose who they want. What do you think will happen when the person wants a CIS mate and they discover the truth? They're going to get pissed and dump you. Now you have to shame them into staying with you: "If you loved me for real this wouldn't bother you"... that's not going to convince anyone. They're either going to leave, or they'll resent you forever. That's just how it is. You can be mad at that but that's about as effective as protesting the rising of the sun. There's just no way to win once you've gone down that road.

"I want a CIS mate" is not the same as "trans women are not women" - one is a preference, the other is harmful prejudice. On the flip side CIS people who do date trans people shouldn't be shamed for their choices either. A man should be free to date a trans woman and not catch flak about it. Trans people should be able to be openly trans and not face hate speech or threats to their well-being. This, without any exception whatsoever.

The fundamental fact is when you shame or worse abrogate people's right to choose who they want to get intimate with, it's not going to end well for you. All you're going to get is people who resent being coerced or bullied to date people they don't want to. And that's not something the country, or the world, will ever put up with. Except that right now, most people don't imagine they can be labeled a transphobe just for wanting a CIS mate. And unpopular opinion: that should be nipped in the bud.

view more: next ›

GhostFence

joined 9 months ago