No - I have worn moccasins around the house, at least in the winter, since I was a kid and make-them-yourself kits were in fashion back in the '70s. No idea how many pairs I have had since then.
My SOs homemade pizza this evening with goats cheese, 'nduja and a drizzle of honey.
I think that 'a posh car' is ARR, and then 'carriers' is H ODS.
My main requirement is that it has to be available on my heavily locked down work phone and work laptop as well as my home ones. If it isnt in my face whenever I look at a screen, it isnt going to work. So it ends up being Google tasks.
I don't know whether it was you, but I have responded to this same question on Lemmy before.
Yes. We had a coal fire when I was growing up - in the 60s and 70s -, so it was an everyday thing during the winters.
In my case, I approached our usual plumbing contractor who have a couple of labs that they usually used. I now go directly to those labs.
You can't lose what you weren't following in the first place.
I seldom recall my dreams at all, but whenever I do they seem to feature the normal range of colours. I have always found the idea that dreams are NOT usually in colour to be very odd.
The car is in for some work after breaking down yesterday, so we won't be going anywhere until Monday at least.
Some homemade Mexican and TV this evening. Mouseproofing my SO's shed/studio, moving the tumbledryer to its more accessible winter position and getting the garden furniture into the other shed are the jobs for the weekend otherwise.
I have slept on one for around a year in the past. It was relatively cheap, but with a frame.
It was generally fine. A lot firmer that the mattresses that I have slept on most of the time otherwise, and I think that I do prefer a softer option overall, but it was still perfectly comfortable. I did find that I needed to remake/rearrange the bedding much more often than on a bed: fitted sheets didn't work with the futon, which was the main cause.
I would sleep on one again for a limited period without issue, but wouldn't be happy if I had to have one permanently from now on - or, at least, I would want to put in a good deal of research on the range of types available.
What kind of explanation are you looking for?
As well as the required technology, it was political will during the cold war that drove the manned landing back then. That political will hasn't been there since: no-one is really interested in being second on the moon just for the sake of it.
And technological advances have, if anything, made manned missions less necessary if we want to investigate particular subjects: robots and remote scanning can do far more these days without the need for boots on the ground.
I have read comparisons in the past. I don't have them to hand, but the conclusion was that dishwashers were more efficient in terms of water use and energy. However, the type of hand-washing that it was being compared to was itself a very inefficient style of washing (tap running continuously? two full sinks for rinsing? I can't recall, but not the way that we do).
So handwashing the way we do is probably more efficient but it seems that there isn't THAT much in it either way, and given the time taken and that we cook from scratch almost all the time, we use a dishwasher for the vast bulk of stuff.